My two old friends!!!

[paddoboy]

Hi to all my old friends here! Am having the usual full moments over at SFN, mainly learning from the many experts, but also offering some knowledge in areas I am familiar with along with plenty of science articles which are much appreciated. I am though somewhat surprised that in my previous time here, that I gained a couple of dear friends that have seen the need to follow me over there and attempt to harrass me when they can.
In both cases they have failed miserably. One of them that calls himself q-reeus and who I exposed here as an ID inspired poster has now been totally banned due to his incessent posting of nonsense and continued anti GR rants as he did here. The other is still operating although somewhat shackled and under permanent moderation due to his usual ridiculous pedant nonsense and childish behaviour with the rep points, with regard to myself, and just as he undertook here. There he goes by the handle of et pet. His handle here I won't mention, as I am feeling rather sorry for him and am under the impression that he needs psychiatric help more then anything else, although I have given clues already to his identity and his obviously dummy acting ways [another clue there!!!]
Otherwise I'm on top of the world there and always learning new stuff everyday and making my usual small offerrings.
That's all for a couple of months or when I check in again.

cheers and beers
paddoboy

 

[cluelusshusbund]

Well glad thangs is workin out... dont be a stranger

 

[NotEinstein]

Am having the usual full moments over at SFN, mainly learning from the many experts, but also offering some knowledge in areas I am familiar with along with plenty of science articles which are much appreciated. I am though somewhat surprised that in my previous time here, that I gained a couple of dear friends that have seen the need to follow me over there and attempt to harrass me when they can.
In both cases they have failed miserably. One of them that calls himself q-reeus and who I exposed here as an ID inspired poster has now been totally banned due to his incessent posting of nonsense and continued anti GR rants as he did here. The other is still operating although somewhat shackled and under permanent moderation due to his usual ridiculous pedant nonsense and childish behaviour with the rep points, with regard to myself, and just as he undertook here. There he goes by the handle of et pet. His handle here I won't mention, as I am feeling rather sorry for him and am under the impression that he needs psychiatric help more then anything else, although I have given clues already to his identity and his obviously dummy acting ways [another clue there!!!]

I've been reading these exchanges, and the reactions from the (quite obviously) knowledgeable people over there. Very fascinating indeed, to see how well (and what) some of our local members do elsewhere.

 

[paddoboy]

I've been reading these exchanges, and the reactions from the (quite obviously) knowledgeable people over there. Very fascinating indeed, to see how well (and what) some of our local members do elsewhere.

Actually the two members involved, conducted themselves over there, exactly the way they conducted themselves here! That's why one is banned, and the other with mental problems, is moderated. Take it easy NotEinstein!

 

[NotEinstein]

Actually the two members involved, conducted themselves over there, exactly the way they conducted themselves here!

I suspected as much. Turns out pseudoscience-peddlers typically only have one track: pseudoscience-peddling.

That's why one is banned, and the other with mental problems, is moderated.

I find it interesting how certain (types of?) people manage such feats as constantly getting moderated and/or banned. It's a gift I seem to be lacking.

Take it easy NotEinstein!

You too!

 

[DaveC426913]

Hi to all my old friends here!

:waves:

 

[paddoboy]

:waves:

 

[paddoboy]

I find it interesting how certain (types of?) people manage such feats as constantly getting moderated and/or banned. It's a gift I seem to be lacking.

Sometimes personal agendas are responsible for crazy interactions!
Thank Christ though that the mods over there are awake to their antics, particularly the et pet character.

 

[Q-reeus]

Sometimes personal agendas are responsible for crazy interactions!
Thank Christ though that the mods over there are awake to their antics, particularly the et pet character.

Like your own need to dive back in here just to shit stir, instead of letting go what transpired at another site! You initiated a fairly recent reply-disabled, gloating 'conversation', following my ideologically/petty-personally motivated ban at SFN. I responded with another 'conversation' which civily did allow replying. And there reminded you with two choice examples (out of many) of your utterly venemous and insane tirades against me here before:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/traveling-toward-a-light-source.160434/page-2#post-3496906
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/dark-matter-and-energy-an-explanation.161392/#post-3554154
It was beneath my dignity to refute one-by-one all the crap you spouted there - not only factually wrong but such frothing-at-the-mouth belligerence is totally contrary to SF forum rules and guidlines. Of course as a PC favored son here, nothing more than a gentle slap on the wrist came your way.

Funny how you berated both James R and rpenner for being 'gutless', yet it's largely because you are the belly-crawling sycophant at SFN (plus always praising officially approved everything), while I took no shit from anyone there, that you keep accumulating worthless Marxist Mickey Mouse positive 'green points', while I was finally showered with 'red points' and banned post haste.
Such points being handed out by anonymous cowards who thus need give no justification or motive for scoring either way. A fatally flawed system - obviously open to abuse.

Anyway, I'm only surprised NotEinstein in #5 decided to put the boot in too. Maybe he would care to justify with links here to specific posts/threads at SFN, or PM me if that is preferred. Or not - I'm not that fussed, just bemused. I have posted nothing there imo to be ashamed of. On the contrary, showed up a number of 'esteemed members' there as lacking both knowledge and personal integrity. Anyone is free to rummage through every single post I made at SFN, which unlike here, keeps the personal page of banned members 'live' for viewing:
https://www.scienceforums.net/profile/47761-q-reeus/content/

 

[paddoboy]

I'm not that fussed, just bemused. I have posted nothing there imo to be ashamed of. On the contrary, showed up a number of 'esteemed members' there as lacking both knowledge and personal integrity. Anyone is free to rummage through every single post I made at SFN, which unlike here, keeps the personal page of banned members 'live' for viewing:
https://www.scienceforums.net/profile/47761-q-reeus/content/

Your delusional qualities are number one q-reeus old son!
the rest of your tirade and usual mixture of crying and berating, deserves nothing more then....

Just one question though my ID inspired friend...how many forums is that now you have been banned from? But anyway, take it easy OK?

 

[Q-reeus]

...Just one question though my ID inspired friend...how many forums is that now you have been banned from? But anyway, take it easy OK?

As someone who likes to keep score I'm sure you know - two. SFN and PhysicsForums. The circumstances leading up to the latter case have been discussed here a number of times before. You lasted just 10 days span there as active member - though not 'officially' banned per se. Probably got on your knee and begged. As far as scoring in general, which you obviously think important, note I have never been suspended here at SF, whereas iirc you have been at least three times.

So, you keep breaking your earlier word about departing here 'for good'. Not surprised.

 

[NotEinstein]

Like your own need to dive back in here just to shit stir, instead of letting go what transpired at another site!

*cough*
http://www.sciphysicsforums.com/spfbb1/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=344#p8062

Hypocrite.

Anyway, I'm only surprised NotEinstein in #5 decided to put the boot in too.

See above. You couldn't formulate a GR problem in GR terms, and then went on another website complaining about me when I pointed that out.

Maybe he would care to justify with links here to specific posts/threads at SFN, or PM me if that is preferred.

Justify what?

Or not - I'm not that fussed, just bemused.

Same here; I've rather enjoyed our conversations. It's given me valuable insights into a particular kind of mind.

I have posted nothing there imo to be ashamed of.

I know you feel that way.

On the contrary, showed up a number of 'esteemed members' there as lacking both knowledge and personal integrity.

And there you go again, dissing people from another forum. Pot, kettle.

Anyone is free to rummage through every single post I made at SFN, which unlike here, keeps the personal page of banned members 'live' for viewing:
https://www.scienceforums.net/profile/47761-q-reeus/content/

Yes, and I advise everybody to do the same. There's a lot to learn there; not everything GR-related though.

 

[paddoboy]

.
So, you keep breaking your earlier word about departing here 'for good'. Not surprised.

Yes, yes I failed to live up to that. But hey let me tell you why I did mention and raise your demise over at SFN. Simply because after checking a few of your posts here, I have seen how you have mentioned me in my absence in rather disparaging remarks on occasion. Quite cowardly don't you agree q-reeus, as well as hypocritical trying to pick me up on that.
Let me also offer my thoughts on your ID inspired agenda which I picked up quite a few moons ago. In my opinion you would have had much more criticism of the general nonsense you have portrayed, but members were obviously rather sheepish of your biting, critical and bullying tongue and treated you with kid gloves as did James. With me that failed as I just don't suffer bullies of any persasion, religious or otherwise.
Your other fallback to the criticism of your nonsensical claims re GR has been falling back on the old conspiracy card, where like other pseudonuts, you claim incalcitrance of mainstream or biased towards incumbent models, and of course bullying of science forum moderators as you did over at SFN.
That obvious excuse was even to my surprise reinforced with your belief in the 9/11 conspiracy nonsense. That's when I knew 100% you were round the bend.
Anyway old friend, I'll leave the forum open to you at this time.I have shown you for what you are and I really don't need to do anymore.

ps: Sorry I forgot, I am also a member [non active] over at cosmoquest as well as the physics forum and a past member of a now defunct forum run by the ABC in Australia. Unlike you I am not banned from any of them despite serving some time here and even at SFN after being foolish enough to start trading insults with you.
Why do I prefer SFN? Because the nutbags and IDers are quickly pulled into line. In summing, far more quality over there then the quantity supported by nonsense that they do here.
My last reply, yes to this as I don't need to say anymore. Will I return...not sure, maybe, who knows your luck in a big city!

 

[NotEinstein]

That obvious excuse was even to my surprise reinforced with your belief in the 9/11 conspiracy nonsense. That's when I knew 100% you were round the bend.

Wait, really? I did pick up on the ID stuff (eventually), but I didn't know that. It so fits my "model" of the type of person, though.

 

[paddoboy]

Wait, really? I did pick up on the ID stuff (eventually), but I didn't know that. It so fits my "model" of the type of person, though.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/wo...e-9-11-conspiracy.160979/page-15#post-3554296
There're all weirdos imo!

 

[exchemist]

Like your own need to dive back in here just to shit stir, instead of letting go what transpired at another site! You initiated a fairly recent reply-disabled, gloating 'conversation', following my ideologically/petty-personally motivated ban at SFN. I responded with another 'conversation' which civily did allow replying. And there reminded you with two choice examples (out of many) of your utterly venemous and insane tirades against me here before:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/traveling-toward-a-light-source.160434/page-2#post-3496906
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/dark-matter-and-energy-an-explanation.161392/#post-3554154
It was beneath my dignity to refute one-by-one all the crap you spouted there - not only factually wrong but such frothing-at-the-mouth belligerence is totally contrary to SF forum rules and guidlines. Of course as a PC favored son here, nothing more than a gentle slap on the wrist came your way.

Funny how you berated both James R and rpenner for being 'gutless', yet it's largely because you are the belly-crawling sycophant at SFN (plus always praising officially approved everything), while I took no shit from anyone there, that you keep accumulating worthless Marxist Mickey Mouse positive 'green points', while I was finally showered with 'red points' and banned post haste.
Such points being handed out by anonymous cowards who thus need give no justification or motive for scoring either way. A fatally flawed system - obviously open to abuse.

Anyway, I'm only surprised NotEinstein in #5 decided to put the boot in too. Maybe he would care to justify with links here to specific posts/threads at SFN, or PM me if that is preferred. Or not - I'm not that fussed, just bemused. I have posted nothing there imo to be ashamed of. On the contrary, showed up a number of 'esteemed members' there as lacking both knowledge and personal integrity. Anyone is free to rummage through every single post I made at SFN, which unlike here, keeps the personal page of banned members 'live' for viewing:
https://www.scienceforums.net/profile/47761-q-reeus/content/

Q-reeus, why paddo has to show up here just to spill all this bile I don't know, but I was prompted to follow some of the links and was VERY interested to read this one, which you referred to in one of your discussions on these other forums: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/misconceptions-virtual-particles/
This chimes very well with the article about virtual particles by Prof Strassler that I have often had recourse to. I note is is written by Arnold Neumaier, maths prof at Vienna, so he will know what he is talking about. I'm going to save the link.

 

[exchemist]

Hi to all my old friends here! Am having the usual full moments over at SFN, mainly learning from the many experts, but also offering some knowledge in areas I am familiar with along with plenty of science articles which are much appreciated. I am though somewhat surprised that in my previous time here, that I gained a couple of dear friends that have seen the need to follow me over there and attempt to harrass me when they can.
In both cases they have failed miserably. One of them that calls himself q-reeus and who I exposed here as an ID inspired poster has now been totally banned due to his incessent posting of nonsense and continued anti GR rants as he did here. The other is still operating although somewhat shackled and under permanent moderation due to his usual ridiculous pedant nonsense and childish behaviour with the rep points, with regard to myself, and just as he undertook here. There he goes by the handle of et pet. His handle here I won't mention, as I am feeling rather sorry for him and am under the impression that he needs psychiatric help more then anything else, although I have given clues already to his identity and his obviously dummy acting ways [another clue there!!!]
Otherwise I'm on top of the world there and always learning new stuff everyday and making my usual small offerrings.
That's all for a couple of months or when I check in again.

cheers and beers
paddoboy

Bye.

 

[Q-reeus]

It's interesting that following my #11, there has been NO email notifications coming my way. Someone upstairs is evidently looking out for someone else here - not me obviously.

 

[Q-reeus]

*cough*
http://www.sciphysicsforums.com/spfbb1/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=344#p8062
Hypocrite.

It's true I had you in mind, but please note I never provided a name, a link to a relevant post or thread OR even the forum.
You are thus being unfair imo - there is no real comparison to what paddoboy unleashed in OP here. But pray tell, did you discover above linked to by yourself, or did another member here alert you?

See above. You couldn't formulate a GR problem in GR terms, and then went on another website complaining about me when I pointed that out.

Your opinion re formulating, but acknowledge you had no answer to what I fielded there. Link to where you have if you believe otherwise.

And there you go again, dissing people from another forum. Pot, kettle.

General remarks without any names. NOT imo 'pot, kettle'.

 

[Q-reeus]

Yes, yes I failed to live up to that. But hey let me tell you why I did mention and raise your demise over at SFN. Simply because after checking a few of your posts here, I have seen how you have mentioned me in my absence in rather disparaging remarks on occasion. Quite cowardly don't you agree q-reeus, as well as hypocritical trying to pick me up on that.
Let me also offer my thoughts on your ID inspired agenda which I picked up quite a few moons ago. In my opinion you would have had much more criticism of the general nonsense you have portrayed, but members were obviously rather sheepish of your biting, critical and bullying tongue and treated you with kid gloves as did James. With me that failed as I just don't suffer bullies of any persasion, religious or otherwise.
Your other fallback to the criticism of your nonsensical claims re GR has been falling back on the old conspiracy card, where like other pseudonuts, you claim incalcitrance of mainstream or biased towards incumbent models, and of course bullying of science forum moderators as you did over at SFN.
That obvious excuse was even to my surprise reinforced with your belief in the 9/11 conspiracy nonsense. That's when I knew 100% you were round the bend.
Anyway old friend, I'll leave the forum open to you at this time.I have shown you for what you are and I really don't need to do anymore.

ps: Sorry I forgot, I am also a member [non active] over at cosmoquest as well as the physics forum and a past member of a now defunct forum run by the ABC in Australia. Unlike you I am not banned from any of them despite serving some time here and even at SFN after being foolish enough to start trading insults with you.
Why do I prefer SFN? Because the nutbags and IDers are quickly pulled into line. In summing, far more quality over there then the quantity supported by nonsense that they do here.
My last reply, yes to this as I don't need to say anymore. Will I return...not sure, maybe, who knows your luck in a big city!

Too much shit there to bother responding to point by point. Do maintain pride in your 'impeccable record' though.