My Theory

You obviously didn't read Anne Elk's theory.

Please read the abstract or introduction of my paper again. I have explained the necessity of my paper there. Some other applications of my theory also can be found. One of the applications can be by co-relating Newtonian model of of Physics with GR.
 
Last edited:
Initially I was searching for a math which can explain success.
Sorry, but I don't think so. Because...

1) I know about a little bit mathematical error :D

2) And ... Can your math tell you about a bullet (But you don't know) that is coming to you ?
 
Are alternative theories based on alternative facts? :rolleyes:
Mr A is following "The theory of success" to kill Mr B and Mr B is doing same to keep himself alive. :D

25r30wi.gif
 
Sorry, but I don't think so. Because...

Thanks for your interest with my paper. I guess you read my paper.

1) I know about a little bit mathematical error :D

Did you observe any error in my math?

2) And ... Can your math tell you about a bullet (But you don't know) that is coming to you ?

My math is basically about the trajectory of a particle. So it also can be applied to the trajectory of a bullet.
 
Are alternative theories based on alternative facts? :rolleyes:

What is your idea of alternative theory? Also what do you mean by alternative facts?

It takes time for acceptance of any new ideas. I guess Newton's theories were accepted immediately after their publication, because at that time not much of theories were present. But acceptance of Einstein's GR took some time, because already some theories were present at that time.
 
It takes time for acceptance of any new ideas. I guess Newton's theories were accepted immediately after their publication, because at that time not much of theories were present. But acceptance of Einstein's GR took some time, because already some theories were present at that time.
It never fails. Never. After a bit of criticism, people with "alternative theories" always, always, compare their work and themselves to Galileo, Newton or Einstein. :p:rolleyes:
 
I don't really want to keep knocking down your sandcastle.

I read your paper; my opinion is that it is word salad.

If you want to keep bumping this thread to get eyeballs on it, no prob. I'll leave you to it.
 
It never fails. Never. After a bit of criticism, people with "alternative theories" always, always, compare their work and themselves to Galileo, Newton or Einstein. :p:rolleyes:
That's worth 5 points on the crackpot index.
You don't say... ;)
I too, believe that MY hypotheses are correct (as did Newton, Wright brothers, Einstein, and myriad others throughout history did so for theirs). In time 'the truth will out'.
 
If my theory of success is compared with Einstein's formula of success; it can be seen that though Einstein made a formula in the form of an equation, it is still qualitative and not mathematical.
 
Back
Top