DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
You obviously didn't read Anne Elk's theory.That implies my math is correct.
You obviously didn't read Anne Elk's theory.That implies my math is correct.
You obviously didn't read Anne Elk's theory.
Then please tell us here how you defined success. I'd be interested in knowing.
Sorry, but I don't think so. Because...Initially I was searching for a math which can explain success.
Mr A is following "The theory of success" to kill Mr B and Mr B is doing same to keep himself alive.Are alternative theories based on alternative facts?![]()
Sorry, but I don't think so. Because...
1) I know about a little bit mathematical error![]()
2) And ... Can your math tell you about a bullet (But you don't know) that is coming to you ?
Sorry, but I don't think so. Because...
1) I know about a little bit mathematical error
2) And ... Can your math tell you about a bullet (But you don't know) that is coming to you ?
Are alternative theories based on alternative facts?![]()
It never fails. Never. After a bit of criticism, people with "alternative theories" always, always, compare their work and themselves to Galileo, Newton or Einstein.It takes time for acceptance of any new ideas. I guess Newton's theories were accepted immediately after their publication, because at that time not much of theories were present. But acceptance of Einstein's GR took some time, because already some theories were present at that time.
It never fails. Never. After a bit of criticism, people with "alternative theories" always, always, compare their work and themselves to Galileo, Newton or Einstein.![]()
That's worth 5 points on the crackpot index.It never fails. Never. After a bit of criticism, people with "alternative theories" always, always, compare their work and themselves to Galileo, Newton or Einstein.![]()
Great. So nothing to do with the humano-philosophical nature of "success".My math is basically about the trajectory of a particle. So it also can be applied to the trajectory of a bullet.
Thank you! I remember seeing the "Crackpot Index" somewhere. <thumbs up>That's worth 5 points on the crackpot index.
Great. So nothing to do with the humano-philosophical nature of "success".
You don't say...That's worth 5 points on the crackpot index.It never fails. Never. After a bit of criticism, people with "alternative theories" always, always, compare their work and themselves to Galileo, Newton or Einstein.![]()
I too, believe that MY hypotheses are correct (as did Newton, Wright brothers, Einstein, and myriad others throughout history did so for theirs). In time 'the truth will out'.
Seems Einstein also developed a formula for success. http://www.success.com/article/einsteins-formula-for-success