Apparently, from the OP, he applied to the copy write office of the government of India. Just one other thing he doesn't seem to understand...besides what references in papers are used for. You don't copywrite a new scientific idea, you submit it for publication in peer-reviewed science journal.![]()
Not in Western countries, you don't. Copyright is generally an automatic right of any author. No registrations needed.Copyright is pretty much automatic. If you want enforceable copyright protection, then you apply and get a registration number.
Sorry, this reply of mine is silly - I had not read yours properly - apologies: ignore it.Not in Western countries, you don't. Copyright is generally an automatic right of any author. No registrations needed.
But I've just learnt that India, for one, does have a bureaucratic procedure, rather as you describe.
Well good luck to hansda then.
If I divide by zero and obtain a result, is that "success", according to your theory?
If you're just now looking for some references after completing your paper and filing for copyright, you're doing it wrong.
Copyright is pretty much automatic. If you want enforceable copyright protection, then you apply and get a registration number.
Success is discovering that your math will not work for my definition.
Correct.Apparently, from the OP, he applied to the copy write office of the government of India.
Say I want to give references for the mathematical terms differentiation and integration. The reference should be for the paper where they were discovered/published first or any other standard resource like http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ . OR no reference is required for these terms as they are very common knowledge by now.Just one other thing he doesn't seem to understand...besides what references in papers are used for.
You don't copywrite a new scientific idea,
you submit it for publication in peer-reviewed science journal.![]()
One application took 18 months, another was less than a year.
Run your '' model'' to find if your '' theory'' will be a success.
Really, do you actually believe that? You have no chance of contributing anything to physics or science. I am not being mean, I am just stating a fact. I won't contribute anything either, that is just the way it is. If you really want to contribute, you will need to devote 8 to 10 years of your life learning physics - then maybe (but probaly not) you can come up with something that is a useful contribution.My theory basically is a mathematical model. This theory/model will be a success if it is accepted.
Well, you are being kinda mean.You have no chance of contributing anything to physics or science. I am not being mean, I am just stating a fact.
What question? I wasn't responding to a question.Why don't we just take his question at face-value without second-guessing it?
Several questions are implicit in the OP. They're why he posted.What question? I wasn't responding to a question.
I wasn't responding to the OP. I don't think encouraging a person to waste their time on delusions is being kind.Several questions are implicit in the OP. They're why he posted.