Oh no, my beautiful tub of vitriolic pus-spewing hatred (ie this thread) is in the cesspool!. Now it cannot be the most popular thread in open government.
Communist Hamster said:Oh no, my beautiful tub of vitriolic pus-spewing hatred (ie this thread) is in the cesspool!. Now it cannot be the most popular thread in open government.
Cottontop3000 said:Who needs your welcome?
spuriousmonkey said:maybe it can be the most popular thread in the cesspool. But then you still have a long way to go.
invert_nexus said:Are you wearing panties?
Harlequin said:... although I'm quite gratified to see this has finally been consigned to the cesspool.
Game over.
Xev said:/Xev: rolls around on the floor shrieking with laughter.
Meph, now you deny that babble about "this is who Harlequin really is and why he is on this thread"
No sir, you don't get it. See, I don't care about Harlequin (actually I do 'cause he's cool but I could care less what his name is) and really hadn't read the ten pages it would require to see why it matters or who all you people are in relation to each other.
Nor do I care about his or nexus' supposed interest in your new and consummated relationship with she who publically humiliated invert nexus, nor do I care who is jealous of who, and quite frankly I think the lot of you are pathetic, you most so because anyone lame enough to skulk after an internet-person and then claim that others are jealous of you for the fact is, well, really ridiculous.
Plus the high-school cloak-and-dagger bullshit is just ludicrous.
Please die, all of you.
invert_nexus said:There has been talk from some posters about how horrible it is that Gendanken has humiliated me publically.
Harlequin said:Which dead philosopher? It seems I have some reading to do. Or perhaps not. You know, I've read very little philosophy. Some might consider that a crime too. I don't.
Harlequin said:Aye. Until proved otherwise. Going to take a crack at it?
Harlequin said:Hah! Finally seeing the illustration?
Harlequin said:Even Gendanken made herself into an illustration.
I still haven't seen a single one who saw what was actually there.
Only one responded intelligently and swam the undercurrents - Spookz. Now ain't that a turn up for the books.
Harlequin said:Do not inflate things so much.
Harlequin said:I have my convictions, and my beliefs, the same as everyone here. They've been garnered over years of experience and observation. And self-analysis.
Harlequin said:What would you prefer? I take a back seat, say "please explain" a lot and accept every piece of bullshit that is thrown my way? Pretend I'm all meek and humble, like, when I'm not?
Harlequin said:Let me throw something into the ring............cases.
Harlequin said:Can a psycologist ever separate himself competely from his work? At times, it's a little like being two people at once. The invovled, and the observer. Or perhaps the gestalt - the involved observer.
Harlequin said:Know something? When I wrote that, I knew how it looked. I wondered if anyone would attempt to trip me on it.
Harlequin said:Again.... I am right. Prove me wrong rather than quoting from your handbook.
Harlequin said:Synopsis. In others, I might believe an argument about something they simply cannot see. In Gendanken, I expected more.
Perhaps I was mistaken.
Harlequin said:Look back. I always refer to them by their nick. Unless I see something amusing in it when they've completely failed to earn that.
Therefore, after that post by you - Gusty. Windy.
I can't believe I had to explain that!.
*chuckle*
and quite frankly it doesn't matter an iota what you think of how you've been treated.
invert_nexus said:You know. I've felt bad for you. How things turned out. But, unlike you, I never focused on how you were 'publically humilated'.
Which hurt worse? That or the loss of friendship?
Which do you spend more time thinking about?
Or was it the pity?