Light, dark and clear

Status
Not open for further replies.
Obviously ou do not understand rayleigh scattering then... because your explanation was entirely WRONG.
I was not explaining the Rayleigh effect, it has no issues in the topic. You are adding interference to the topic, natural has no interference by humanity.
This is sciences common mistake, in thinking that interference mean something compared to the naturalism and nature of light.

Interference and the outcomes you are making yourselves,
 
I was not explaining the Rayleigh effect, it has no issues in the topic. You are adding interference to the topic, natural has no interference by humanity.
This is sciences common mistake, in thinking that interference mean something compared to the naturalism and nature of light.

Interference and the outcomes you are making yourselves,

No, the Rayleigh Effect is the exact explanation for the topic at hand... you are adding "interference" to the topic by not understanding what you are talking about worth one wit!

The only "mistake" of science here is allowing people with no knowledge of the subject to bark their crazy opinions loud enough that poor fools that don't know better actually start to believe them.
 
No, the Rayleigh Effect is the exact explanation for the topic at hand... you are adding "interference" to the topic by not understanding what you are talking about worth one wit!

The only "mistake" of science here is allowing people with no knowledge of the subject to bark their crazy opinions loud enough that poor fools that don't know better actually start to believe them.
The thing is this person with crazy ideas understands exactly what he is talking about but is unable to convey the message by a lack of terminology and knowledge. Air is not a dielectric conductor, it is a Non-dielectric conduit.


Matter and cloud like mediums are dielectric conductors.

''A dielectric material (dielectric for short) is an electrical insulator that can be polarized by an applied electric field. When a dielectric is placed in an electric field, electric charges do not flow through the material as they do in a conductor, but only slightly shift from their average equilibrium positions causing dielectric polarization. Because of dielectric polarization, positive charges are displaced toward the field and negative charges shift in the opposite direction. This creates an internal electric field that reduces the overall field within the dielectric itself.[1] If a dielectric is composed of weakly bonded molecules, those molecules not only become polarized, but also reorient so that their symmetry axes align to the field.[1]''


A polarization that also is the gravitational polarity of an object or medium.

There is no need for light to be a diffused scattering in air when light is linear . The magnetic field and blue sky are a dielectric field. The blue sky being the result of dielectric propagation.


You do not understand ME, I understand science and everything you and science says.
 
My model got binned about gravity when I was explaining this.

I honestly have only just seen this diagram, my model was me.
 

Attachments

  • 640px-Dielectric_model.svg.png
    640px-Dielectric_model.svg.png
    29.4 KB · Views: 2
''In physics, permittivity is a complex quantity. The imaginary part corresponds to a phase shift of the polarization P relative to E and leads to the attenuation of electromagnetic waves passing through the medium. By definition, the linear relative permittivity of vacuum is equal to 1,[12] that is ε = ε0, although there are theoretical nonlinear quantum effects in vacuum that exist at high field strengths.[13]''

My edit

In physics, permittivity is a complex quantity. The spectrum part of Em radiation corresponds to a phase shift of the polarization C relative to E and leads to the attenuation of electromagnetic waves passing through the medium or object.
 
My edit
In physics, permittivity is a complex quantity. The spectrum part of Em radiation corresponds to a phase shift of the polarization C relative to E and leads to the attenuation of electromagnetic waves passing through the medium or object.
Your edit changed a concept into gibberish. Fine job....
 
Your edit changed a concept into gibberish. Fine job....
I am trying to explain it is not easy, I do really understand the nature of light, everything I have eve said about any subject is based on present information, you already have all the answers, but n one so far as put the answers of what you have got together to Unify them all.
My science is your science, I understand now the brilliance of science, all your singular thoughts of present science are the unity of everything.
There is nothing unanswered in my opinion , all the natures are known, I am trying to point it out to you.
 
You are WRONG! A random word generator makes more sense than you, tc.
I am wrong in saying science is right? that is irony.

I will do gravity for you.

Op- Hello science you are wrong about gravity because you do not know the mechanism of gravity.

science - well sorry to tell you but gravity is the Physical process, the mechanism is studied under different departments and being in relation to atomic research and quantum.
 
I am trying to explain it is not easy,
It is not your fault, trying to explain a poorly thought out illogical idea is difficult.
I do really understand the nature of light
No you really don't.
everything I have eve said about any subject is based on present information,
No you have stated your misunderstanding of science.
you already have all the answers,
Nobody has all the answers.
but n one so far as put the answers of what you have got together to Unify them all.
True
My science is your science,
False.
I understand now the brilliance of science,
False.
all your singular thoughts of present science are the unity of everything.
What ever.
There is nothing unanswered in my opinion , all the natures are known,
False.
I am trying to point it out to you.
But you have no idea what you are talking about.
 
Gravity is not known for certain - this has already been explained to you. However, there are several theories being tested constantly...



This literally means nothing to me at all...
I have being trying to tell you for a while now, you do know the certainty of gravity by already science that exists.

Example - a block of metal heated expands, you are adding energy to every individual proton contained in the mass.
The charged Protons excite, they start to repel the other charged Protons in the mass stretching the molecular bonding.

The charging extends the dielectric field of the atom.
 
Go troll someone else or discuss the thread.

Pointing out that what you say is gibberish is not trolling. Your thread has no clear (get it?) focus, and besides, everything you've said here has been wrong or gibberish.
So what is there to discuss?
How and why you're wrong has already been done, you just won't accept it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top