In the contrary, as you show practically every time you post on the subject: you don't have a clue.
Yeah right ...
Light, dark and clear
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
NO! Look up dielectric on wiki, it is a pretty easy to understand.
You are not going to avoid this question with deflection and try to hide the post from the front line.
The last word is not the natural choice of an American which differs again from the natural choice of an Australian, but represents a compromise in the spirit of decorum.
Before the big bang there was nothing, time started by the big bang, a singular point that was a whole at the same time. A blank canvass, a blank canvass of a void in the perceived image by humanity, starting with nothing is a stating point of thought, a void can be considered a nothing, it is shapeless, timeless, energy less, infinite, the big bang starting from a singular point of the imagination.
Actual models of the Big Bang describe it as a space-like, not a time-like, singularity. Thus, it had finite spatial extent and was not considered as a geometric point but rather as an absurdly hot and dense and uniform state spread all over creation.
Also at that time, the nature of the universe did not allow light as we know it. Light as we know it is a linear superposition of two primordial forces in electroweak theory.
Also at that time, the nature of the universe did not allow light as we know it. Light as we know it is a linear superposition of two primordial forces in electroweak theory.
That was going to be my next diagram, has anyone considered that the big bang is much further back in time than the expansion of matter into space, and after the big bang there was a steady state Universe formed, and something else such has a huge wormhole made the expansion?
I see a black square with some MS Paint Spraypaint Tool red and green dots...
So, no, it is neither a void, nor am I unable to see
The only agreement is that making a picture of an absurd idea does not make the idea any less absurd.
It is obvious that the coloured specs represent CBMR , can you see it in reality?
Notice i do not say observe it.
Your avoiding answering because you know very well I know what I am talking about.
Can we "see" the Cosmic Background Radiation with our naked eye? No. It's outside the visible light spectrum.
That does not provide any evidence that "darkness" is a tangible thing... if anything, the fact that we can detect the CBR with instrumentation proves that it isn't tangible...
Thank you, so although the void in the diagram does contain a ''weak light'' we still do not have the ability to see, to us it is technically dark, but not the absence of light, the absence of sight.
Also before CMBR you can clearly observe a natural state of space that is absolute dark, when adding CBMR it is no longer absolute dark but the lack of sight ability, if we had stronger senses we could indeed see by use of the CBMR alone.
Would you agree?
No, it is absent of any visible light that our relatively weak photo-receptors in our eyes are capable of picking up, that is all.
No, we could not... for the same reason that if I put you in the middle of a room and surrounded you 360 degrees with super-bright lights, you would be unable to see.
CMBR is visible light by device, it also is everywhere and enter our eyes.
You would be able to not see in super bright lights because you are not tuned into that sort of intensity, the same has you can not see in CBMR because that is a weak intensity and a frequency your eyes are not tuned into.
Ok moving on, the CBMR is almost everywhere, Sun light has to pass through the CBMR?
No, visible light doesn't have to "pass through" it... it's not a solid/liquid/gas/plasma after all...
Yes it is not of a Physical body, but it has a presence, a low energy presence without Physical body that must allow light to pass through with interference. (like your lumunferous ether) but an energy rather than a gas?
CBMR must have a purpose in the process, if it is there it does something, what does it do?
I see lightless areas on the CBMR cosmology model?
I see lightless areas on the CBMR cosmology model?
It is said that CBMR is the left overs from the big bang as such, how do you know it was not there before the big bang and the cause of the big bang?
- Status