Science does not apologise for being objective , it is subjective to think that what I am discussing is anyway offensive or reflects on me . I am unbiased but try to be accurate and honest .
Your reply is evidence of the neurological subjectiveness I mention , you subjectively believe by my words that I am homophobic etc , which is not true . However, science needs a correct understanding as opposed subjective. Our neurological process knowledge would not be good if we were going to add untruths rather than an objective reflection of reality.
Neurological dualism can end with an unsolved problem if the objective answer can't be determined by finding the neurological singularity by objectiveness . Something's have points and then at other times things seem to have no points at all, I suppose that's the complexity of life though and the neurological process .