Is LGBT a neurological misunderstanding ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
We are born with survival instincts that are in a sense behaviours , however that does not mean our neurological process contains any information .
Completely untrue. We are born with the information that several million years of evolution have provided us with.
We gain neurological information by our senses and experiences , often a contributing factor in the developing of neurological maturity .
Yes, we gain information, and our brains evolve. They do not start out as blank.
 
Yes that is correct!
Huh. That makes you sound like a homophobic bigot, someone who thinks LGBT people are inherently defective. Similar to the people who think that blacks are fundamentally stupider/more lazy/less competent than whites, and the people who think women do not have the mental facilities to be able to vote or own property.
 
Huh. That makes you sound like a homophobic bigot, someone who thinks LGBT people are inherently defective. Similar to the people who think that blacks are fundamentally stupider/more lazy/less competent than whites, and the people who think women do not have the mental facilities to be able to vote or own property.

Science does not apologise for being objective , it is subjective to think that what I am discussing is anyway offensive or reflects on me . I am unbiased but try to be accurate and honest .
Your reply is evidence of the neurological subjectiveness I mention , you subjectively believe by my words that I am homophobic etc , which is not true . However, science needs a correct understanding as opposed subjective. Our neurological process knowledge would not be good if we were going to add untruths rather than an objective reflection of reality.

Neurological dualism can end with an unsolved problem if the objective answer can't be determined by finding the neurological singularity by objectiveness . Something's have points and then at other times things seem to have no points at all, I suppose that's the complexity of life though and the neurological process .
 
Science does not apologise for being objective , it is subjective to think that what I am discussing is anyway offensive or reflects on me . I am unbiased but try to be accurate and honest .
Your reply is evidence of the neurological subjectiveness I mention , you subjectively believe by my words that I am homophobic etc , which is not true . However, science needs a correct understanding as opposed subjective. Our neurological process knowledge would not be good if we were going to add untruths rather than an objective reflection of reality.

Neurological dualism can end with an unsolved problem if the objective answer can't be determined by finding the neurological singularity by objectiveness . Something's have points and then at other times things seem to have no points at all, I suppose that's the complexity of life though and the neurological process .
Do you just insert the word "neurological" at random places in your posts?
 
Science does not apologise for being objective , it is subjective to think that what I am discussing is anyway offensive or reflects on me . I am unbiased but try to be accurate and honest .
?? Nope. Homophobia has a specific definition. That's an objective reality, observable by going to a dictionary.
Our neurological process knowledge would not be good if we were going to add untruths rather than an objective reflection of reality.
Absolutely. And by subjectively deciding that gay people have a defect that is "tricking them" into thinking something unreal about themselves, you are adding untruth.
Neurological dualism can end with an unsolved problem if the objective answer can't be determined by finding the neurological singularity by objectiveness . Something's have points and then at other times things seem to have no points at all, I suppose that's the complexity of life though and the neurological process .
It looks like you are getting defensive, and are resorting to word salad with neurologic dressing.

(You can skip the "I am NOT DEFENSIVE!" part of your reply; to save you some typing, we will just assume it has already been said.)
 
Do you just insert the word "neurological" at random places in your posts?
I frequently use the word if discussing the neurological process whilst in freelance thinking . You are correct though in that I probably use it too often and I should end with the use .
 
?? Nope. Homophobia has a specific definition. That's an objective reality, observable by going to a dictionary.

Absolutely. And by subjectively deciding that gay people have a defect that is "tricking them" into thinking something unreal about themselves, you are adding untruth.

It looks like you are getting defensive, and are resorting to word salad with neurologic dressing.

(You can skip the "I am NOT DEFENSIVE!" part of your reply; to save you some typing, we will just assume it has already been said.)
I never said gay people have a defect , that is your own interpretation and your own words .
I said as per topic title , a misunderstanding is not a defect , it is a lack of education .

Mental health and anxiety for example , anxiety is subjective and an easy fix .

You can fix yourself of anxiety by redefining anxiety and calling it bioelectrical stimulus instead , once a person accepts the new definition and understands it , the neurological side of anxiety is fixed..
 
I never said gay people have a defect , that is your own interpretation and your own words .
Here are your exact words:

"objectively they see their own gender but their own neurological process is subjectively tricking them into thinking otherwise ."

When Wegs asked if "the person who is identifying as LBGTQ is experiencing a neurological 'misunderstanding' " you said "Yes that is correct!"

I said as per topic title , a misunderstanding is not a defect , it is a lack of education .
No, it is not.

A gay woman who looks at herself in the mirror and sees a gay woman is not experiencing a neurological misunderstanding. She is correctly perceiving herself. She is not defective. She does not have a misunderstanding. She is not tricking herself. She does not have a lack of education.
Mental health and anxiety for example , anxiety is subjective and an easy fix .
Spoken by someone who has never met a mentally ill person.
You can fix yourself of anxiety by redefining anxiety and calling it bioelectrical stimulus instead , once a person accepts the new definition and understands it , the neurological side of anxiety is fixed..
Again, you clearly don't know anyone with a mental illness.
 
Last edited:
Here are your exact words:

"objectively they see their own gender but their own neurological process is subjectively tricking them into thinking otherwise ."

When Wegs asked if "the person who is identifying as LBGTQ is experiencing a neurological 'misunderstanding' " you said "Yes that is correct!"


No, it is not.

A gay woman who looks at herself in the mirror and sees a gay woman is not experiencing a neurological misunderstanding. She is correctly perceiving herself. She is not defective. She does not have a misunderstanding. She is not tricking herself.

Spoken by someone who has never met a mentally ill person.

Again, you clearly don't know anyone with a mental illness.
Erm, I wouldn't be too sure. This is Theorist, back again, with a new schtick. :D
 
You can fix yourself of anxiety by redefining anxiety and calling it bioelectrical stimulus instead , once a person accepts the new definition and understands it , the neurological side of anxiety is fixed..
No one who's an adult in the 21st century can possibly still be this ignorant about mental illness - never mind sexual orientation.

Your understanding of these issues is quite simply archaic. You don't know what you don't know.

:unsub:
 
No one who's an adult in the 21st century can possibly still be this ignorant about mental illness - never mind sexual orientation.

Your understanding of these issues is quite simply archaic. You don't know what you don't know.

:unsub:
Actually , I'm somewhat an expert on the neurological universe around and within you . Additionally I'm some what an expert on MH and redefining MH to Neurological Malfunction will be a thing of the future as the subject is growing in popularity , being a more in depth and understanding of MH subject .

Anxiety is a chemical reaction that creates bioelectric activity that stimulates neurons , often perceived as a type of fear because the sufferer doesn't understand the simple concept of bioelectrics and brain stimulus .

You've obviously never experienced anxiety to understand it .
 
Actually , I'm somewhat an expert on the neurological universe around and within you . Additionally I'm some what an expert on MH and redefining MH to Neurological Malfunction will be a thing of the future as the subject is growing in popularity , being a more in depth and understanding of MH subject .
Ah! Your expertise is an excellent neurologic example of Dunning-Krueger Syndrome, a neurologic condition that is well understood by the neurologic community. It's neurologic science and you are a great neurologic example! Congratulations. Neurologic.
 
Here are your exact words:

"objectively they see their own gender but their own neurological process is subjectively tricking them into thinking otherwise ."

When Wegs asked if "the person who is identifying as LBGTQ is experiencing a neurological 'misunderstanding' " you said "Yes that is correct!"


No, it is not.

A gay woman who looks at herself in the mirror and sees a gay woman is not experiencing a neurological misunderstanding. She is correctly perceiving herself. She is not defective. She does not have a misunderstanding. She is not tricking herself. She does not have a lack of education.

Spoken by someone who has never met a mentally ill person.

Again, you clearly don't know anyone with a mental illness.
If you'd read correctly , the mirror was a transgender example . A women in a room of women and feeling aroused was the lesbian example .

The point was we can feel aroused on our own , the woman in the example may think it is the other women that are arousing her when the fact is , it is natural and can happen on your own .
 
Ah! Your expertise is an excellent neurologic example of Dunning-Krueger Syndrome, a neurologic condition that is well understood by the neurologic community. It's neurologic science and you are a great neurologic example! Congratulations. Neurologic.
Actually , your neuro response to something you do not understand is to bring in the Dunning Krueger effect , a neurological defense often used when the topic is too advanced for a participant .

My scientific research and investigations are advanced in this field of study .
 
If you'd read correctly , the mirror was a transgender example . A women in a room of women and feeling aroused was the lesbian example .
If a woman looks in a mirror and actually sees a man, then that is a serious problem with perception. Fortunately that is very rare.

If a woman looks in a mirror and sees a woman, but would prefer to be a man, that is not a problem.
If a fat woman looks in a mirror and sees a fat woman, but would prefer to be thin, that is not a problem.
The point was we can feel aroused on our own , the woman in the example may think it is the other women that are arousing her when the fact is , it is natural and can happen on your own .
Are you claiming that lesbians are not actually aroused by other women? (this should be good)
 
If a woman looks in a mirror and actually sees a man, then that is a serious problem with perception. Fortunately that is very rare.

If a woman looks in a mirror and sees a woman, but would prefer to be a man, that is not a problem.
If a fat woman looks in a mirror and sees a fat woman, but would prefer to be thin, that is not a problem.

Are you claiming that lesbians are not actually aroused by other women? (this should be good)
Firstly , if a women looks into a mirror but wishes they were a man instead , that doesn't mean they were born a man in a women's body . The fact is their want to be the opposite sex then causes the subjectiveness .

I'm not claiming that lesbians are not aroused by other women , I'm stating that we can be aroused on our own but if you were to become aroused in your early years and were a girl with other girls , you may be somewhat confused and think you was a lesbian.
 
They are advanced? Does that mean you watched _two_ Youtube videos?
Not at all , it just simply means I have new input on the subject that advances the subject .
I am presently trying to become a freelance writer on various subjects , so far no avail , so I thought I'd share a few thoughts on the subject in brief here .
 
Mental health and anxiety for example , anxiety is subjective and an easy fix .
Spoken by someone who has never met a mentally ill person.
Spoken by someone who has nursed mental ill people I wish we would have had MT in the wards many times for this easy fix

Medication rounds were harrowing at times and would have loved a easy fix to empty the ward and go back to my love, maternity ward

:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top