I began to take MSM back in 1999...

Beer w/Straw said:
Don't you mean String Theory is to replace Darwinian Theory?
Click to expand...


I personally like the description that indicates the evolution of a higher dimensional intelligence
as they apparently planned an essentially infinite number of Big Bang type events over infinite time in the past.....
This seems a lot more probable to me than the Darwinian model of Evolution....

https://www.near-death.com/experiences/exceptional/mellen-thomas-benedict.html#a05

I was in pre creation, before the Big Bang. I had crossed over the beginning of time / the First Word / the First vibration. I was in the Eye of Creation. I felt as if I was touching the Face of God. It was not a religious feeling. Simply, I was at one with Absolute Life and Consciousness. When I say that I could see or perceive forever, I mean that I could experience all of creation generating itself. It was without beginning and without end. That’s a mind-expanding thought, isn’t it? Scientists perceive the Big Bang as a single event that created the Universe. I saw during my life after death experience that the Big Bang is only one of an infinite number of Big Bangs creating Universes endlessly and simultaneously. The only images that even come close in human terms would be those created by super computers using fractal geometry equations.

The ancients knew of this. They said God had periodically created new Universes by breathing out, and recreated other Universes by breathing in. These epochs were called Yugas. Modern science called this the Big Bang. I was in absolute, pure consciousness. I could see or perceive all the Big Bangs or Yugas creating and recreating themselves. Instantly I entered into them all simultaneously. I saw that each and every little piece of creation has the power to create. It is very difficult to try to explain this. I am still speechless about this.
Click to expand...
 
Beer w/Straw said:
Doesn't that lay the ground for String Theory to replace Biology as a whole?
Click to expand...

I really hadn't even thought of that possibility......
but it is true that after his NDE Mellen Benedict did patent some interesting devices related to healing.

https://www.near-death.com/experiences/exceptional/mellen-thomas-benedict.html#a01
Benedict has been closely involved in the research area of Quantum Biology - the quantum relationship between light and life. Benedict has discovered how living cells can respond very quickly to light stimulation resulting in, among other things, high speed healing. His research is providing dramatic new perspectives on how biological systems work. He is also a technology and product consultant and a popular lecturer on the subjects of longevity, energy medicine, and phototherapy.
Click to expand...
 
Dennis Tate said:
On the plus side... I don't have any shares in any MSM producer...

Nor do I have any shares in Dr. Tejman's website.... but Darwinian style Evolutionary Theory is dead.... and may as well be buried.........! String Theory must be factored into a logical variation of Evolutionary Theory.
Click to expand...
 
Dennis Tate said:
My apologies for not catching onto this earlier....
but I think that you have got it.....
that is likely where our emphasis will go in the near future.
Click to expand...
Well,
1] the two theories have nothing to do with each other; one will not replace the other
2] string theory is not, technically a theory, since we have no evidence for it; it's more like a conjecture
3] string theory makes no predictions we could test - or more accurately, it makes any prediction you want, which means it can't be falsified
4] we are unlikely to have any evidence for it in the foreseeable future; it is way too far beyond our current experimental technology
 
DaveC426913 said:
Well,
1] the two theories have nothing to do with each other; one will not replace the other
2] string theory is not, technically a theory, since we have no evidence for it; it's more like a conjecture
3] string theory makes no predictions we could test - or more accurately, it makes any prediction you want, which means it can't be falsified
4] we are unlikely to have any evidence for it in the foreseeable future; it is way too far beyond our current experimental technology
Click to expand...


But there are some speakers and writers who are convincing huge numbers of us of the implications of String Theory....
this guy's lectures are pretty awesome....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eben_Alexander_(author)
 
Dennis Tate said:
But there are some speakers and writers who are convincing huge numbers of us of the implications of String Theory....
this guy's lectures are pretty awesome....
Click to expand...
Yes. I'm a big fan of it myself.

But our science is still too primitive to move it from really cool conjecture to scientific theory.

"String theory is a piece of 21st-century physics that has fallen by accident into the 20th century and therefore will require 22nd-century mathematics to solve."
- Daniele Amati
 
DaveC426913 said:
Yes. I'm a big fan of it myself.

But our science is still too primitive to move it from really cool conjecture to scientific theory.

"String theory is a piece of 21st-century physics that has fallen by accident into the 20th century and therefore will require 22nd-century mathematics to solve."
- Daniele Amati
Click to expand...

Good point... but truthful eye witness accounts could be helping us and Dr. Eben Alexander impressed me as being honest about what he experienced.
 
Beer w/Straw said:
Don't you mean String Theory is to replace Darwinian Theory?
Click to expand...

Dennis Tate said:
that is likely where our emphasis will go in the near future.
Click to expand...

interesting
logic suggests that Darwinian evolution as a mechanism is not inherently invalidated by conceptual long form causative evolution
as a functional process ...
assuming we can use genetic faults & abnormalities as examples

i do not see why Darwinian evolution as a basic function can not exist inside another wider field
many things have influence, Darwinian evolution is just an easily identifiable influential factor.

i guess if we wanted to get super picky
can we see viruses evolve in the same function as Darwinian process ?
at what point does complex life creation exist to where it renders some of its own basic needs to form a working level ? (common question i believe)
but on a neurological level i "assume" there must be a certain minimum collection of prerequisite functional elements
is that collection of prerequisites sitting outside any primary effectual doctrine of Darwinian theory ?
i have asked myself this many times over the years
and my mind tends to see Darwinian theory being the artist painting a sculpture that which already exists
 
DaveC426913 said:
Er what?
Dr. Alexander "experienced" string theory?
Or is this a misplaced response to some other post/thread?
Click to expand...

My belief is that near death experiencers are seeing higher invisible dimensions as explained by String Theory.

"It was not until 1920 that the idea of linking electromagnetism and
gravity resurfaced. At that time a new theory of gravitation had been proposed by Albert Einstein (1879-1955), called the general theory of relativity. It was a replacement of Newton's theory, which had stood unchallenged since 1687. Inspired by Einstein's work, a young German mathematician named Theodore Kaluza was seized by a curious idea. The theory of relativity links space an time together to form a four-dimensional space-time continuum. What would happen, mused Kaluza, if general relativity were formulated in five rather than four dimensions? This is what Kaluza did, and to everyone's astonishment it was discovered that five-dimensional gravity obeys the same laws as
four-dimensional gravity as well as Maxwell's laws for the electromagnetic field. In other words, gravitation and electromagnetism are automatically unified in five dimensions, where electromagnetism is merely a component of gravity!"

The only drawback of the theory concerns the extra dimension. Why
don't we see it? An ingenious answer was provided by Oskar Klein. A
hosepipe viewed from afar looks like a wiggly line, i.e. one- dimensional.
However, on closer inspection it can be seen as a narrow tube. It is, in fact,
two-dimensional, and what was taken to be a point on the line is actually a
little circle going around the tube. In the same way, reasoned Klein, what we normally regard as a point in three dimensional space could in reality be a little circle going around a fourth space dimension. Thus Kaluza's extra
dimension might well exist, but be impossible to detect because it is closed
(circular) and rolled up to a very small circumference. In spite of
these bizarre overtones, it seems probable that in future a "theory of everything" will make use of the idea of unseen higher dimensions."
....

"Although nature manifests four distinct forces, physicists believe that
each may be part of a smaller number of more primitive forces. At high energy, the electromagnetic and weak forces appear to merge into a single "electroweak" force. Some "grand unified theories" suggest that a further amalgamation takes place between the electroweak and strong forces at as yet unattained energies. The most ambitious unification schemes envisage an amalgamation of all four forces into a single "superforce" at ultra-high levels of energy."...
"The real burden in the next three centuries will not be the development of fancy mathematics, but the experimental testing of these ambitious theories. All current thinking about total unification assumes that the effects of linking all the forces and particles together will only become manifest at energies that are some trillion times greater than those currently attainable in particle accelerators. Probably we shall never reach such energies directly" ( A Theory of Everything" Volume 21 of "The World of Science)​
Click to expand...
 
RainbowSingularity said:
interesting
logic suggests that Darwinian evolution as a mechanism is not inherently invalidated by conceptual long form causative evolution
as a functional process ...
assuming we can use genetic faults & abnormalities as examples

i do not see why Darwinian evolution as a basic function can not exist inside another wider field
many things have influence, Darwinian evolution is just an easily identifiable influential factor.

i guess if we wanted to get super picky
can we see viruses evolve in the same function as Darwinian process ?
at what point does complex life creation exist to where it renders some of its own basic needs to form a working level ? (common question i believe)
but on a neurological level i "assume" there must be a certain minimum collection of prerequisite functional elements
is that collection of prerequisites sitting outside any primary effectual doctrine of Darwinian theory ?
i have asked myself this many times over the years
and my mind tends to see Darwinian theory being the artist painting a sculpture that which already exists
Click to expand...


True.... variation within species over time is not invalidated by
finding out that the bulk of "evolution" would take place over essentially infinite time in the past
in higher dimensions of space and time.

But all of this will soon look different than it did even twenty or thirty years ago before we saw this new information.
 
Dennis Tate said:
But all of this will soon look different than it did even twenty or thirty years ago before we saw this new information.
Click to expand...

it appears that only 1 vision will be possible to allow modern human civilization to move past climate change & SAR'S
that vision requires science to be in the front seat not being whipped by some slave master lunatic on a power trip
 
RainbowSingularity said:
it appears that only 1 vision will be possible to allow modern human civilization to move past climate change & SAR'S
that vision requires science to be in the front seat not being whipped by some slave master lunatic on a power trip
Click to expand...

You have a good point......
we all have ego and all of us would tend to be somewhat selfish and autocratic if Bill Gates were to award us a billion dollars to attempt to set in motions any variation of:


http://www.sciforums.com/threads/unified-field-theory-of-modern-world-problems.164127/
Unified Field Theory of Modern World Problems......

I already have a pretty good idea that my tendencies to be lethargic and avoiding conflict would doom any attempt that I might make to organize something like this????



exchemist said:
Click to expand...

Check out the latest post to the UFTofMWP discussion ...... I am getting even worse every day!!!! Oh... and thank you for the sarcasm.... you are adding "Artistic and Comedic Value" to my discussions...... bring it on brother!!!!!!!
 
Michael 345 said:
Neither had I

Googled it

Looks like a miracle cure for everything but very little research into any particular cure

Filed away with homeopath and placebo under the main heading WOO WOO MEDICAL

:)
Click to expand...

It is dirt cheap....
I actually take the powdered version for horses.. .because it is vegetarian grade.....
it is so low cost that no company has any particular incentive to study it extensively but.. my wife and her older sister had similar results to my own.
 
I originally heard about MSM from the late actor James Coburn who credited MSM with controlling his rheumatoid arthritis so he could resume his acting career and win an Oscar. (He said he used a teaspoon and a half twice a day.)
I have used it for about 25 years to mitigate my allergies and reduce my need for prednisone et al. (I use a teaspoon twice a day.)
Like Dennis Tate I purchase the big tub in the horse section.
Sorry to report that it definitely does not prevent covid.
 
candy said:
I originally heard about MSM from the late actor James Coburn who credited MSM with controlling his rheumatoid arthritis so he could resume his acting career and win an Oscar. (He said he used a teaspoon and a half twice a day.)
I have used it for about 25 years to mitigate my allergies and reduce my need for prednisone et al. (I use a teaspoon twice a day.)
Like Dennis Tate I purchase the big tub in the horse section.
Sorry to report that it definitely does not prevent covid.
Click to expand...

you caught covid
how are you recovering ?
any nerve issues ?
has your sense of smell returned

this MSM stuff looks interesting
like a potential bumping crystal for anti oxidant process

candy
you mention steroids

did you ween yourself off them
or just stop suddenly ?
or switch to something else as you stopped them ?
i understand if you do not wish to discus medical things in here

i dislike steroids considerably and will avoid taking them unles the doctor orders me to on pain of something else more terrible
i have gone to the extent of extending antibiotics by another week rather than using steroids
i hate them that much.
but they are an essential part of what i think should be basic home 1st aid kit
steroids
anti psyches
codeine
muscle relaxants
anti inflammatory(NSAIDS)
paracetamol
asprin
ideally also some basic anti anxiety meds
 
Another interesting low cost nutritional supplement is aloe vera juice.

A nutritional sugar in the aloe vera juice seems to assist cells to grow hairlike structures that seem to assist in cellular communication.

If you do a search for "glyco nutrients and cellular communication" there should be some videos come up. I have purchased ninety nine percent pure aloe vera juice for about nine dollars for a gallon. I drank it over about three months.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top