How to hunt Bigfoot in Washington State

[Magical Realist]

It started up as early as 1948. It exploded in the 2000s.

Can't you find something more substantial to be wrong about?

I mentioned in message #34 that noises in the forest do not imply Bigfoot.

No..it really didn't start up as a TV phenomenon until the 2000's. That's when it exploded. Case closed.

Can't you find something more substantial to be wrong about?

You're the one quibbling over statements I made about the dawn of the reality TV era.

I mentioned in message #34 that noises in the forest do not imply Bigfoot.

Non-human and non-known-animal noises do not imply Bigfoot? Since when?

 

[sideshowbob]

Non-human and non-known-animal noises do not imply Bigfoot?

1. We don't know that they're non-human.They probably are human.

2. If they were Bigfoot noises they would be animal noises.

3. If they are noises from an unknown animal there is no reason to think that animal is Bigfoot.

 

[Magical Realist]

1. We don't know that they're non-human.They probably are human.

Yeah...the vocalization experts concluded they couldn't be made by the human larynx. It's all in the video. Watch again.

 

[Beer w/Straw]

Yeah...the vocalization experts concluded they couldn't be made by the human larynx. It's all in the video. Watch again.

This is the real deal.

 

[sideshowbob]

Yeah...the vocalization experts concluded they couldn't be made by the human larynx. It's all in the video. Watch again.

1. Those "experts" have already been called into question in this thread.

2. Sounds can be altered electronically.

3. If it wasn't human there's still no reason to conclude it was Bigfoot.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Non-human and non-known-animal noises do not imply Bigfoot? Since when?

Who said they were non-human?

 

[Magical Realist]

1. Those "experts" have already been called into question in this thread.

2. Sounds can be altered electronically.

Based on no evidence whatsoever.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Based on no evidence whatsoever.

And that's exactly what you are doing. You have no evidence that the sounds were made by Bigfoot.

 

[Magical Realist]

And that's exactly what you are doing. You have no evidence that the sounds were made by Bigfoot.

Except for sounds that were examined by experts as not originating from a human or any known animal.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Except for sounds that were examined by experts as not originating from a human or any known animal.

Yeah, experts hired by the show.

 

[Magical Realist]

Yeah, experts hired by the show.

No show around when the recordings were made.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

No show around when the recordings were made.

And?

 

[sideshowbob]

Based on no evidence whatsoever.

1. Tell us who the experts were. Otherwise there's no evidence that they were experts.

2. Do you really need evidence that sound recordings can be altered? Movie people do it all the time. It's a whole profession. (And they're in the trailer right next to the guys who make the Bigfoot costumes.)

 

[Magical Realist]

Do you really need evidence that sound recordings can be altered?

Yeah I do. I need evidence these particular sound recordings were altered. It's called evidence.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Yeah I do. It's called evidence.

Give us evidence that those sounds weren't produced by mechanical means. Trot out these experts, for starters. Have them tell us who paid them for their work analyzing the sounds.

 

[Magical Realist]

Give us evidence that those sounds weren't produced by mechanical means.

No..it's not my job to disprove your claim. You need to prove your own claim.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Okay, I'll call you a liar until you prove you're not lying about that.

 

[Magical Realist]

Okay, I'll call you a liar until you prove you're not lying about that.

You call me a liar anyway. Why should that worry me?

 

[sideshowbob]

I need evidence these particular sound recordings were altered.

That's not a very scientific attitude. Somebody who was interested in the truth would be eager to have the authenticity of the recordings verified.

 

[Magical Realist]

That's not a very scientific attitude. Somebody who was interested in the truth would be eager to have the authenticity of the recordings verified.

So confirmation that the sound recordings were altered is not scientific? LOL! Got it...