I did not claim you excluded the US from consideration.Everything in my posts has included the US, so far. To claim I have excluded the US from consideration is bizarre.
Are you OK?
I did not claim you excluded the US from consideration.Everything in my posts has included the US, so far. To claim I have excluded the US from consideration is bizarre.
You assumed that in Post 319.I did not claim you excluded the US from consideration.
It does not noticeably reduce the wealth inequality in the US, and its effect on the power inequality anywhere is complex and food for another thread.Two examples - Camfed and Tostan. They are both dedicated to the education of women in third world countries. This education reduces wealth (and power) inequality in those countries.
Top ten richest men almost have 50% of the total wealth of middle class people.
This is not balanced.
How to distribute wealth equally?
You do not need billions to survive, do you?
So, why accumulate billions of wealth? Greedy?
Can we make all people to have enough money to survive?
It should not be "distribution" of the wealth, it should be "sharing" in the wealth.You cannot distribute wealth equally.
Try distributing it fairly.
Hah - I dare you! Just try!
Who is this?the Investor
But not to the point that the Investor made nothing .
Why are you concerned about what they get?Whom ever they are .
Why are you concerned about what they get?
OK You don't know, or care, who they are.
Do you know what they do?
Do you know what their role is in the distribution of wealth?
Can you explain why "the investor" should get "something"?
So, It's a secret?I do actually .
Time passes whether anyone invests or not. Why should any particular person be paid for 'time'?Because of time , resources ; both in money and Human resources ( research ) .
What is an investor researching, and why is it worth rewarding?research
It does if your efforts allow that work to happen. For example - taking a person and employing them as a worker, providing them with the tools, space and support they need to do the work.Okay, being rewarded for one's work makes sense.
Being rewarded other people's work doesn't make sense.
It varies.What is an investor researching, and why is it worth rewarding?
People these days are the same as they ever were. Technology, policy and the inherent nature of capitalism have amplified a lot of the financial inequities in our society. However, financial inequities does not equal "greedy and self-absorbed."People these days are very greedy and very self-absorbed.
You also focus on it whenever your stereotype requires that other people be assuming all the rich are greedy and self-absorbed.I got the system working and he went back to work on his laptop. I never forgot that incident, though, and I think about it whenever anyone assumes that rich people are greedy and self-absorbed.
Top ten richest men almost have 50% of the total wealth of middle class people.
This is not balanced.
How to distribute wealth equally?
You do not need billions to survive, do you?
So, why accumulate billions of wealth? Greedy?
Can we make all people to have enough money to survive?