And your "my Son" remark is RUBBISH!
You are right, of course.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fn36l_z3WY
And your "my Son" remark is RUBBISH!
You are right, of course.
What would constitute scientific proof of the paranormal for you then? Would measurements and readings taking by audio, emf, and video devices do it for ya?
As is the case with UFO's, extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence.
And just as the UFOology game draws the ratbags from left right and center, so to does claims of ghosts, spirits, fairies, goblins etc...Andy1033 is a case in point.
P=="PseudoSkeptics are always saying, "There's no evidence for any paranormal or psychic phenomena" no matter how much evidence is shown to them. That's because this statement is a religion to them, not an objective statement. So no matter what evidence you give them, they will always deny it and raise the bar, simply because "there is no evidence" is a fixed belief to them.
Some sceptics of the UFO phenom are like this as well. Therefore I make it my job to know more than them on the subject, so that when I do speak about UFO's to someone, I can do so efficiently and with facts.
Some sceptics, don't recognize these facts nor acknowledge any evidence. I believe it has more to do with the self-security of the proposal that aliens have been visiting us. To even entertain the notion for a second for some, is not only unbelievable, but a scary notion.
I don't know what is so outlandish about the prospect of ET's visiting us in the first place. Most scientists agree there are very likely many very advanced ET's out there. Considering the vastness of space the odds are in their favor. Why couldn't they be visiting us? As with ghosts the eyewitness accounts abound.
It's all a bunch of WOO WOO and if people want to believe in that well that's up to them but I never will.
I don't know what is so outlandish about the prospect of ET's visiting us in the first place. Most scientists agree there are very likely many very advanced ET's out there. Considering the vastness of space the odds are in their favor. Why couldn't they be visiting us? As with ghosts the eyewitness accounts abound.
The vastness of space.
What we understand is possible, is not what the sceptic listens to. The reason why, isn't because we cannot maintain a reasonable argument for the notion of alien life, but that the notion is of itself alone alien to our understanding. This is why many don't believe... what we call ''out of this world,'' is indeed ''out of this mind,'' for many.
There have been con artists with us since humans started making money so that when they can make money selling their nonsense like UFO's or ghosts they don't need to work , they get paid for their lying and deceit. Since they never can have any valid solid object that are from another world they can dupe people into believing anything. Look at TV programs that are based on the paranormal and see how much they are earning as well as movies. It's all a bunch of WOO WOO and if people want to believe in that well that's up to them but I never will.
But real science has never had any fear of the alien and the undefined.
There was a damaging stigma after project Grudge and Blue Book that science is against the idea of aliens in general. I have an entire chapter in my book which proves this isn't the case.
But real science has never had any fear of the alien and the undefined. It's entire progress might even been seen as a bold encroachment upon this shadowy territory. If anything fear of the alien expresses the insular security that religion gives one in an uncertain universe. The assumption that everything is already well-understood and known and nothing out there can really take us by surprise. That's why I think skeptics are really just using science as a faith-based dogma in which there is moral value in adhering to. Watch how fast skeptics become hostile and mocking of any possibility of ufos, ghosts, psychic powers, etc. That's a righteous indignation typical more of the religious than of the truly curious. IOW, when you can't argue against something, ad hom it to death.
That's all very theoretical. It could take more energy to make one than any species is capable of harnessing."In 1935, physicists Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen used the theory of general relativity to propose the existence of "bridges" through space-time. These paths, called Einstein-Rosen bridges or wormholes, connect two different points in space-time, theoretically creating a shortcut that could reduce travel time and distance." - See more at: http://www.space.com/20881-wormholes.html#sthash.N4H9yfYw.dpuf
You have a book? What is the title?
It's not that skeptics don't think there is alien life, they just think it would be very extraordinary and highly unlikely for them to come visit us, given the distances involved even to the nearest star.