Kaiduorkhon
Registered Senior Member
GR states no such thing! It deals with MASSIVE bodies that curves space-time, not such trivial objects as baseballs and bullets. The common principles of ballistics have been clearly understood for a very long time.
Dear Read-Only, do you believe that if you say something enough times, that will make it true. I have replied to your contention in a responsible manner. Twice. Your evasive retort is now:
----------------------------------------------------------------Poppycock. I see no reason at all to make any effort to debunk such garbage when it so clearly IS garbage in the first place. :shrug:
Note to Mods: Would someone please move this pile of junk to the Cesspool where it so rightfully belongs? Thanks in advance.
Correction:
Read-Only aggressively includes himself in the issued, Post-Scripted category. Debate formats disqualify such unfounded allusions - including strung out adjectives of 'garbage' - out of hand.
Read-Only's opening statement is "I see no reason at all to make any effort...".
He would dazzle the reader with a terse pretense of victory for a demonstrated surrender.
Moreover, his personal appeal - and 'advance thanks' - to Mods belies an impertinent appeal to the ('pile of junk') refuge of politics.
Read-Only's flaunted hubris apparently finds confidence in the 29 April event of a senior Moderator decision to place my OP thread in the 'cesspool' - http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=69650&page=5 - you would relegate your debate station as being above reproach while proffering a politically quantitative petition in place of scientifically qualitative reason.
Your impertinent confidence that you may place authority figures under your spell is duly noted.
Whereas, you would deprive me of the allowance of my continued community membership afforded me by cogent Mods and administrators, as posted in kororoti's thread on 'Protecting non-violent hate speech' ; the operative word in this case being 'non-violent', while my previous posts clarified that a (now legally prohibited genre of hate site) was projected on me from late December 03 to mid '04 - it fabricated false, grotesque, 'rumor' vehicularized allegations which, even as we speak, continue to be (residually posted) - as I have said before - a potential endangerment to qualified family and friends. This also a point that Willnever chooses to ignore, while acting in defense of an individual who saturated the net with prevarications, many of which are still in evidence, as I have also previously clarified.
Chimpkin responds to the Posting of the issued thread as though it were a threat and/or addressed to him, while introducing provocative implications such as his response to the simple statement of fact:
“ (and a lot more intel than your mere isp coordinates, addresses and phone numbers) ”
Chimpkin's response is a volatile, completely off topic and inappropriate 'question' - subjecting 'stalking' and 'threats':
---------------------------------------
So you are internet stalking sciforums members now?
While I understand that this info can be had if you really want it?
I find it very creepy and threatening that you actually would do so.
As well as an extremely dishonorable act.
You could insult me all day and I would not invade your privacy, or even threaten to do so.
-------------------
Whereas the SciForums staff allowed me to make the following specific and veritable qualifications:
Kaiduorkhon
Registered Senior User (423 posts)
05-09-11, 02:02 PM #53
The following 'dialogue' consists of responses to the original starting post on the issued thread (reprise):
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=69650&page=5
Chimpkin speaks as though the original post of that thread is addressed to him, rather than as the public caveat it forthwith identifies itself as being... All of that in the penumbra of subjective sidewalk psychiatric vocabulary alluding to 'grandiose delusion' and 'paranoia' centralised in a guise cast upon me.
----------------------------
“ Originally Posted by chimpkin
Dude, I never saw you before this forum.
And I really don't care about you now.
I don't give a rat's ass about you or your problems at this point.
I do not want to hear about you or your problems anymore, I do not want to see hide nor hair of you, I don't want to share geography with you.
If you're going to threaten to publish my IP, name, and home address you're threatening me
I told you what I thought of you pretty bluntly, but I never threatened you.
Go fuck yourself with a sledgehammer, and be sure not to use lube.. ”
-----------------------------------
Firstly, chimpkin, you were not threatened at all (you do specify: If you're going to threaten to publish my IP, name, and home address you're threatening me), whereas, posters on the subjected thread were reminded of the recently activated (U.S. Constitution sacking) 'Home Security' and 'Patriot' acts, which empower 'government' to tap anyone's phone and/or place anyone on satellite TV facilitated reconnaisance,24/7/365, without a judge's order or 'due cause'.
No. You didn't threaten me, neither did I say that you had (invaded my privacy, or, threatened to do so). Whereas, your elaborately inflammatory and provocative language and epithets are disregarded, as reflections on your character.
_________________
Dyw blithely practices the same devoid contempt for the rules of debate and fair play, with:
“ He's largely incoherent and eminently ignorable. ” - Dyw
chimpkin's response to Dyw:
"Incoherent I agree with.
I perceive him as somewhat of a threat now...not sure how much, very much not wanting to find out how much of a threat.
I don't like threats."
----------------------
Your above statement, chmpkin, clarifies a meandering perception that you have, or had, going on to say furthermore that you are not sure how much, and that you don't want to find out how much...
Meanwhile, significant portions of the critical disagreements with me in the issued dialogue subject 'psychiatric' issues including 'paranoia', and 'grandiose delusions', while you demonstrate the diminutive rhetoric aimed at me...
------------------------------------
The following quote is excerpted from Me-Ki-Gal's post #59 of the issued thread:
"I am going to change human perception based on this very idea . The V formation is being built as we speak in more ways than one for Golly gee mister wizard I learned the law of rumors and how through underground networking not based in media blitzing information can be transmitted by hypnotic suggesting."
Me-Ki-Gal closes this post with:
"What you gonna do , What you gonna do when they come for you?"
--------------------------
Is that not a threat?
"Especially in the wake of Randwolf's closure of post #46 in the same thread: "O'course, paranoid does not preclude real enemies pursuing you..."
Is that not a threat?
------------------
In post # 60 of the issued thread, is my qualified statement:
"Any further epithets, cryptically veiled threats or other (continued) denigrating gesticulations directed this way - by whomever - will only add more diabolically motivated dishonor (and a lot more intel than your mere isp coordinates, addresses and phone numbers) to the unfolding history..."
The 'intel' alluded to very specifically does not state that thread participants will fall under the (Orwellian) auspices or contingencies of the so-called 'Homeland Security' or 'Patriot' acts. Ostensibly, I certainly don't have the wherewithal or influence to carry out what is - however tentatively - alluded to as 'threat'. What I did say and intend is that everyone on this - or any other - portion of the internet, is subject to the anti-Constitutionally installed Homeland Security and Patriot acts. Particularly when it involves the emergence of elements of the self-declared (fugitive) ROFACO.
That is my (documented/manifest) story, and I am sticking to it.
Repeat:
chimpkin's response to the above quoted excerpt is post #61 from the issued thread http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=69650&page=5
"So you are internet stalking sciforums members now?
While I understand that this info can be had if you really want it?
I find it very creepy and threatening that you actually would do so.
As well as an extremely dishonorable act.
You could insult me all day and I would not invade your privacy, or even threaten to do so."
-----------------------------------------------------
Post #62: followed chimpkin's above post:
Bob's Big Boy
The Best Burger in Town (0 posts)
04-29-11, 08:44 AM #62
"This is some thread here, boy. Some of these posts make me totally ROFACO."
---------------------------------
As expressed in post #48 of this thread, what Me-Ki-Gal describes as 'rumor'... "through underground networking not based in media blitzing information can be transmitted by hypnotic suggesting..."
Corresponds with 'Bob's Big Boy' declaration that:
"Some of these posts make me totally ROFACO."
Firstly, that statement is tantamount to a public confession, since no one can 'make' the author of that post anything he hasn't or doesn't make himself.
Whereas, the emergence & motive of 'Bob's Big Boy' (BBB, post #62) in the issued thread is also revealed (above) in post #48 of this thread.
What BBB establishes in his 'Best Burger in Town' post is A) the acronymic ROFACO (Robertson Family Conspiracy) is still active; and, which B) places the author of that ('Bob's Big Boy' <Robert's son> ) post in the legal jurisdiction of Title 18 of the Federal code ('conspiracy') - the qualification that no matter how extended a felony vehicularized by so called 'rumor' is, all statutes of limitation are nullified: as long as the originator and/or accessories to that felony are still active.
Moreover, the author of the post subjected in this paragraph, along with no less than scores of accessories, did specifically state on the internet, many times in many ways (between December 03 & September 04), that I am a physical threat to women and children. That hate-site was ordered down in a court of law, while its (feloniously 'rumored') connotations ('Terrorism': "the use of force or threats to intimidate, etc., especially as a political policy. Intense fear; that which causes intense fear". Webster's.
Drawing administrative personnel into covert (PM) huddles to deprive their designated 'target' of responding to his accusers and their accusations.
All and much more of these definitions were repeatedly and diversely projected on myself and my wife (by the self-maintaining 'ROFACO') continue - internationally and indefinitely - as 'inspiration' to untold numbers of criminal individuals and groups, thereby generating and maintaining a physical threat against myself and my qualified family and friends.
The described condition was in fact applied to and vehicularized upon the internet, and, consequently, is being counter-stated and identified by way of the same communications medium, in this notable case, enabled by the grace of Sciforum adminstrators.
That is what is qualified in my post that:
"Any further epithets, cryptically veiled threats or other (continued) denigrating gesticulations directed this way - by whomever - will only add more diabolically motivated dishonor (and a lot more intel than your mere isp coordinates, addresses and phone numbers) to the unfolding history..."
It allows for the possibility that the entire thread, or any part of it, may in fact be overseen, evaluated and/or traced; it does not say that is occurring.
I have no power whatsoever to control what 'the powers that be' may or not be doing with this or that post, thread or forum, on this - or any other part - of the net; while most people are in fact aware that such powers exist and comparatively diminish the powers of the public internet to a relatively archaic status (the Reader is invited to refer to the example of technological resources at point in:
http://forums.delphiforums.com/molly...sages/?msg=2.1 )
On the other hand, in light of the Homeland Security and Patriot acts, such reconnaissance is in fact a real and incumbent technology, and, since the poster of the 'Bob's Big Boy' missive, that individual has in fact boldly 'made himself' a high priority candidate for being targeted - as a fugitive, active element of his acronymic usage: 'ROFACO', while further identifying his (supposedly unaccountable and 'anonymous') self.
(Segue to 'You Light Up My Life'?)
Post Script:
Certainly I have taken note of the remarkable fact that the moderators and admistration personnel of Sciforums have reinstated my privilege of posting new threads, etceteras...
This unexpected allowance truly humbles me, and surely speaks volumes of cerebral and moral liberation not often seen in any number of other internet forums (all and any of which reserve the unrestricted right to disregard the 1st Amendment, when and if applicable).
The theme of alternative thread in this discussion:
"Protecting Non-violent Hate Speech' evokes a very thought provoking series of responses, not unrelated to the incumbent issue at hand. Localized, national and international social dynamics are in accented transition, often regarding dysfunctional government and individuals (refer the book titles, 'Future Shock', and 'The Third Wave', by Alvin Tofler) - an authoritative source alerted me to becoming aware that there are two ways to go bonkers: #1. Acknowledge factually confirmed reality, or, #2. Deny it. Either way challenges the test individual in the laboratory of reality at large. I choose the former - #1. - school of thought.
Sincere gratitude to kororoti for initiating this important thread, and to the administrators of Sciforums, certainly including senior moderator, Tiassa.
I am respectfully,
K. B. Robertson (etceteras)
------------------------------
With some editorial additions, the above post was permitted to be added to kororoti's timely thread.
-------------------------------
Whereas, we have returned to where we started - as a straight line to infinity in Einstein's 4-D space-time continuum, namely:
'Gravity As A Repelling Force - Newton/Einstein';
refer http://www.scribd.com/doc/42821561/Total-Field-Theory...
[I]"We shall not cease from exploration, and after all our exploring, we shall return to where we started, and know the place for the first time". [/I]
(Paraphrased) - T.S. Eliot, FOUR QUARTETS
The initially posted message is provisionally offered here as an addendum to the originally posted caveat at issue:
Characteristically underestimating the intelligence of readership and obviously placing quantitative values above quality; boasting of designing and maintaining felonious collaboration while referring to such activities, which 'Me-Ki-Gal' boldly flaunts as 'rumors', which do indeed emerge as 'mass hypnosis' among criminally bonded groups who don't - or can't afford to - know the difference between rumor and connived collusion (refer, Webster's definition of 'conspiracy', not to exclude decorative vocabularies for common brainwashing, such as 'neurolinguistic programming', 'operant conditioning' and 'psychomolecular restructuring'):
falsely appealing to authority figures; alleging that I threatened or otherwise wronged participating community members, rather than the other way around - as is clearly evidenced to any discerning reader who scrutinizes the self explanatory thread at issue - this time on Sciforums.
It is indeed true that the subjected culpable element has succeeded in - the demonstrated manner - persuading a number of internet forums to ban me from participation.
Bob's Big Boy (BBB) cast his infant child into the RobertsonFamilyConspiracy (ROFACO) pits way back in '64, at the behest of the late ROFACO founder ('Call me') 'Big Brother Dick' Robertson: with the objective of blaming his responsibilities on me (without reporting his 'complaint' to the police: the beginning of a chain of subsequently ensuing felonies) - the former personage (BBB) being the (Army diagnosed, section 8 discharged 'paranoid schizophrenic') 'yes man' to the latter (Dick Robertson), who was in fact a rogue CIA operative: deeply entrenched in the world renowned (Google) 'Presidio Army Fort officer's child day care center pedophile cult', in the late '60's and early 70's (When Dick Robertson resided in Concord, CA. and was the manager of a computer repair establishment on Bryant Street in San Francisco):
Having driven his youngest son to suicide - as described in a preceding portion of this sequel, Dick Robertson was about to be indicted for multiple pedophilia, and massive conspiratorially coordinated embezzlement, when he shot himself.
After decades of being deceived and betrayed, his bewildered wife therafter perished of a heart attack.
I own a cache of typographic transcriptions and audio-tape documentary tape recordings (wire-to-wire copies of which are distributed to key government officials) of Dick Robertson proving in his own words that he is patently culpable of what is spoken of here, including an audiotaped recording of my late uncle, J.P. Savolainen - retired (from 30 years of active duty) Commodore Navy SEAL aviator - confirming that Dick Robertson was in fact a rogue CIA operative.
An extensive documentary of their remarkably pernicious history was posted on - and then hacked off - the net, years ago, but not before it was downloaded all over the world by countless numbers of net denizens, many of whom are familiar with my (cost-free, internet) published works on a variety of subjects.
It (the ROFACO) is also on record in numerous municipal, county, state and federal jurisdictions - including that of (then 17th Federal District Congressman) Leon E. Panetta, as well as Police Chief Belcher and Lieutenant Sepulveda, of the Santa Cruz, CA. P.D.
The tactical objective herein, being to altogether deprive one - or any individual or group - of any and all cyberspace platforms from which to defend self and others. To effect and maintain a corrupt moratorium, shielding them from accountability for what they are responsible for, which - not by coincidence - was and remains the original objective of the founder of this manifest social experiment in psychological warfare, where the constituents who have committed themselves to his designated objective have willfully abandoned their autonomy, and ever since, are no more able to retract their commital than he was. As is evidenced in their variously signatured redundant and evasive styles, where quantitative (ratpack numbered) values precede qualitative contributions to explanatory threads. It seems, while beguiling well intended administrators, to be their objective to hi-jack and besmirch whatever net activities I - or anyone else in agreement - may appear in.
[/I]Sincerely thanking you I am,
K. B. Robertson (aka, etceteras)
Last edited: