Criticise, quick.

First attachment:

Nice very nice though the last two look very much same....more to come later.
 
Up yours, it was due last monday and he specifically said simple things.
 
I like it, really -- I like the eerie effect, the colours. What I don't like, is that it smacks of Photoshop. (Maybe I've played with Photoshop too much.)
 
Actually, it's Illustrator and it's for an Illustrator class, so.... That's how it's supposed to look: draw a shape, fill it in.
 
Oh! I meant CorelDraw, not Photoshop. Duh.

But they actually draw an emotional response out of me. I feel sorta wigged out by them (the creatures) and curious... Their "smoky" bodies are really very cool; I'm not sure if it's more scary or charming to me...
 
Not bad. The colours appear to be very simple (maybe that was the effect that you wanted, or due to simplification of format to attach). It's cool.
 
Whitewolf:
Do you wish the colors were.... warmer, cooler, more saturated?
More saturated.
More.
More.

Give the eye something to wrap around other than the flat greens of cgi.
I wish to hell all this artsy software would burn- hold on, I’m going to be waxing atavistic here and you all can go fuck your mother if you-no-like: artists used to go to sleep with hands smeared with oil, Michelangelo gave his body for it.


Quick critique: the pictures look like tiny orgies of metrosexual fags draped in black. Its not as much art as playing with your keyboard.
 
They look interesting. As sargentlard said, the last two kinda look the same.

I like the colors. And the fuzzy effect on those creatures is a nice effect. They seem happy and content with their lives among the leaves and each other.

Kool pics, whitewolf!
 
gendanken said:
artists used to go to sleep with hands smeared with oil

Bad idea. No wonder they either went crazy or died at an early age. Even today a lot of oil paints are toxic, I can only imagine how it was a century ago.
 
Sargentlard:
Bad idea. No wonder they either went crazy or died at an early age. Even today a lot of oil paints are toxic, I can only imagine how it was a century ago.
All the more reason to consider it.

The most captivating artists have always been mad for some reason- Carrol and Thurber were psychedelic shamans without drugs.
Nietzsche, a hopeful insanity.
Jung describes Freud as going into panic every now and then in the middle of his dialogue.
Swift, another madman.
Godamnit, the list goes on- Dostoevsky, Sade. Insanity is thrilling to be around ( so long as there is a foot of steel between you and the lunatic)- and when creative, the madness is anexplosion.

Courtesy of Week's and James' take on eccentrics (which tend to be mad):

"Ranging from the obvious to the trivial, by careful analysis a profile of the eccentric emerged: creative, strongly motivated by curiosity, idealistic, happily obsessed, aware from early childhood that he was different, intelligent, opinionated and outspoken, not needy of reassurance or reinforcement, unusual in eating and living habits, not particularly interested in the company or opinion of others except in their wanting to persuade others (ha!), possessed of a mischievous sense of humor, single, usually eldest or an only child, and a bad speller."- Eccentrics, a Study of Sanity and Strangeness

In other words, want a more interesting artist? Put mercury in his oil paint.
Or put the Photoshop away.
Muhahhaha.
 
Oh -- but your connoisseurship, you neglected to breath-in Whitewolf's predominant approach, albeit perhaps dormant -- but I'm sure at some point she'll get 'round to apprehending it, and pushing it to its limits: its her sense of rhythm and flow: the eye doesn't just hang at one spot -- it circulates: first principle of a sound structure. Hers is rather ambiguous -- I like that. However -- those damn wired academic art teachers! Whitewolf: don't allow yourself be intimidated by "the elements of design". Know them, but use them at your discretion.

Allow yourself to venture into that luscious forest that beckons you from your dreams. Tell us why you love it so. A byzantine - art nouveau - art deco type forest that doesn't necessarily need be... a forest? Also, it's not the saturation but depth where you most need it: the delicate shadows of the foliage, for example. Be mindful of your different lines: you've got blurs where they feel suspicious, and hard edges that feel too harsh because they feel too faithful, and lines that beg for attention. You understand line, so that shouldn't be a barrier: your tree trunks are worked and solid and attentive. carry that through elsewhere. And mind your backgrounds as much as you do your foregrounds! Backgrounds define the foreground (unless you're going for a spacey abstract genre as I like doing -- but I will still never neglect their significance). Try blending your background into your foregrounds (a simple trick is to merge background shadows into foreground shadows -- that also defines form). You also seem to enjoy positive/negative contrast (I love that -- like an unsolved jigsaw puzzle -- broken english). Exploit that too. Mind the balance, though, 'cuz positve/negative space attract each other. (I like to have them devouring each other.)

Ah -- how I love Photoshop. A powerful software that timid amateurs like to disparage because they can't find the hood.
<br>

p.s.: with Photoshop you can try blending in alien textures, like overlapping fabrics, and still retain your foregrounds. Adjust - tinker - melt.
<br>
 
Last edited:
gendanken said:
Quick critique: the pictures look like tiny orgies of metrosexual fags draped in black.

That cracked me up -- hard. Gendanken, you're a total hard ass!!! What's your story? Go post it for me up in the "Free Thoughts" area, pleeeease.

And I still like the pics.
 
The little people reminded me of 'furries.' If you are unaware of what furries are, you are forgiven. I was unaware of this, ummm, unique group of people, before I began spending too much time on the net.
Furries are people who dress up as animals then engage in orgies. There's also furry porn, mostly in the cartoon style.
The internet is a great unifying force, bringing together likeminded people who like to see anthropomorphic animals pork eachother.

That's what your pictures made me think of.
 
Last edited:
Andy:
(I love that -- like an unsolved jigsaw puzzle -- broken english).
Taste the irony, lick it up, count to three.
Broken HyperEnglish is truly thy domain.

Ah -- how I love Photoshop. A powerful software that timid amateurs like to disparage because they can't find the hood.
Not really.

Hey look, click tack tack wiggle wiggle wiggle.
Need to draw a hand? No problem!! Click tack tack- .gif, .jpg, swoosh.

Need a face? Coming right up! Click, tak, tap- .img, .tif, .ico wiggle.

Your the amateur with the photoshop doing everything for you.

Hyena:
That cracked me up -- hard. Gendanken, you're a total hard ass!!! What's your story? Go post it for me up in the "Free Thoughts" area, pleeeease.
Sure will!
Stay tuned!
Ok???!!
 
Orgies... I'm sure Whitewolf could get into that subject someday -- if she needs to. Actually, I initially thought of Matisse's Dance. How we see what we are!
 
genskunken: Taste the irony, lick it up, count to three.
Broken HyperEnglish is truly thy domain.

And your unparalleled artistry fails to even notice rhythm and flow on a first glance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They look like smears of black ink after a bit of E and remind me of the girl in the martini glass.
Not that they're bad, if you're into that sort of thing.

Fun thread.
 
Back
Top