What "secrets of the universe"?! You informed me in no uncertain terms that it was all common knowledge I was repeating . . . and why was I spewing, repeating, so much common knowledge in my posts?! What a mind! What cement! What incomprehension, and violent vitriol, out of your mediocrity, Dave!
Creation of the universe from the middle out....
- Thread starter Atlan0001
- Start date
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
I have not been violent.
And the only one with vitriol here is you.
All I wanted was for you to admit it to yourself.
Last edited:
You crossed yourself up and you continue to do so. That is why, in your mediocrity, you are here trying to rule the roost and control the narratives instead of being a world class known physics and cosmology celebrity (known higher class (higher than 1-dimensional) dimensional thinker).
Pinball1970
Valued Senior Member
Can you quit already?
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
I cannot rule any roost or control any narratives.
This is a discussion forum. It is for discussing.
What I get to do is ask questions. It is how we engage.
And what you can do is answer. If you are unwilling or unable to answer them, that shows you in a bad light.
I'm obviously unwilling to answer because I've already done so several times to my satisfaction, but obviously never to do so to yours. You won't accept my answers in my originations, so to you I haven't answered at all. That shows something about you and your all too narrow mindset.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
So this is a blog, not a discussion.
It shows only that you have been unable to communicate your ideas you anyone but yourself.
A strange thing coming form someone who claims to be super-intelligent and thinks others are inferior. One would think you would have the intelligence to express your ideas coherently to people other than yourself.
Then, the only person convinced of your argument is you and if you can't convince others of your argument, that's your fault, not theirs.
I'll accept that since elsewhere I had a thousand entries before angering the chief moderator with my coming to defenses of weaker posters against savage attacks (exactly the opposite of what you do), and have surpassed to-date 183,000 reads of a single physics thread on its "Cosmology" forum I originated and have been by far chief poster in, even while being banned. 23,000 reads just since the ban (and that just regarding a single thread of my own origination). I'm not nearly as lonely in my views on, my modeling the multiverse universe of, physics and cosmology, and all otherwise, as you would like and wish me to be.
And that widely popular website is not Physics.org.
Last edited:
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
In theory, the electro-weak force extends to infinity. It is a question of how strong it is at a given distance, and what other forces are in-play that may overwhelm it.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
You are aware that a large percentage of those are bots, right?
Quoting views is not the flex you think it is. Any more than quoting your own IQ. It smacks of desperation.
Saying you are a prodigious poster doesn't really mean anything.
Saying you got banned after posting so much says a lot about the quality of your posts.
You haven't said anything about how many people are engaging, let alone how many people share your views.
For all we know, all you engagers are like me: "What are you talking about?", "Why can't you use standard terminology and concepts?", "Why does it take you a chapter to say what we say in five words?"
Finally, boasting about your accolades - you alleged IQ, your alleged view count - is not the flex you think it is. The only currency in science is the clarity of your ideas.
If you've made twenty zillion posts elsewhere and then been banned - that means s you've had plenty of time to hone your message till it's intelligible. Yet you have failed to do so in all this time. That's damning.
Instead of cursing me, why not use me as a way to determine if you've managed to write your ideas in a comprehensible way. After all, your ideas are not very useful if the only one who can understand them is you, right?
The "observable" universe, the finite infinities / the infinities of finite "observable" universes, at the macroscopic end. At the other microscopic end, the infinities of points to, of blackholes and wormholes in, the all enclosing collapsed cosmological constant, and thus, too, the cosmological constant of heat, of the Planck (BC/BB) Horizon. The constant Horizon!
Only one math serves to top it off and bottom it out, one and the same top and bottom / outside and inside, an unsigned binary base2 ('0') and/or ('1'), but always plus the Trojan. Always inclusive of the Trojan.
Last edited:
I think you might be an exception to the AI argument, feel free to plug your ideas into one then copy paste it here. It might make more sense. Maybe.