Where have i said life must have arisen by supernatural means?
You did not. I'm responding to your actual statement:
All i stated is that science has no proof that life arose naturally on this planet and the place becomes thoroughly unglued.
. . . by pointing out that the fundies "become thoroughly unglued" when we say that life (like absolutely everything else in the universe)
must have arisen by natural means. It is the fundies who throw their hands up in the air and give up on science because we haven't solved all the riddles of nature yet. Forgive me for appearing to misquote you, that was not my intention. Pointing out that we have not yet proven that abiogenesis is possible is usually the first salvo in an attack on the theory of evolution. We are understandably tired of having to constantly fend off the forces of darkness in a website that is supposed to be a place where people come to learn and discuss science. As a Moderator, my approach to the problem is to define "trolling" in more detail so that we can delete their posts and toss them out on their butts, instead of having to repeat the same response fifty times to people who aren't going to read it anyway, in order to serve the people who do come here looking for science. Most of the offenders truly are trolls who are not interested or capable of scientific discussion.
To be humble? To think that there is a force more powerful than me? That's hubris? I'd better call up the folks at Merriam-Webster, ASAP.
There already is a force more powerful than you. Four of them actually: Gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. It's human hubris to insist that the universe cannot possibly be ruled by these soulless, mindless, compassionless natural forces, but must instead be ruled by a supernatural being that is so very much like a giant Homo sapiens.
Yes, I see, because a different person's belief has so much bearing on your own existence. You teach kids to be so intolerant to what other people are so much as thinking.
Sorry, I've posted my advice about emigration so often that I've apparently condensed it beyond the point of comprehension. I'm not urging people to leave America because they can't tolerate religion. If that were all of it, I would urge them to stay and fight for rationality. My point is that the anti-science, anti-rationality program of the Religious Redneck Retard movement is very likely to destroy our economy. Who would want their children to live in a place that was not only ruled by RRR's, but also abjectly poor, possibly a vassal state of China?
Not to mention, the mutual intolerance of the two leading cults of Abrahamism is leading to the resumption of the Crusades. I don't want to be collateral damage in that war and die for a cause I despise.
