I'm no expert in bio weapons.
where does usa get all its medical pills & supply's to run its national private health system ? china !
where do all american households get their at home personal computer devices from ? china !
what does china need with a bio weapon to wipe out its customers ?
why would china want to kill off millions of its customers who bring in foreign currency ?
so china is already inside every american household
right now
& they are busy selling them products
why kill their own best customers ?
I'm no expert in bio weapons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks#Investigation
Authorities traveled to six continents, interviewed over 9,000 people, conducted 67 searches and issued over 6,000 subpoenas. "Hundreds of FBI personnel worked the case at the outset, struggling to discern whether the Sept. 11 al-Qaeda attacks and the anthrax murders were connected before eventually concluding that they were not."
[82] In September 2006, there were still 17 FBI agents and 10
postal inspectors assigned to the case, including FBI Special Agent
C. Frank Figliuzzi who was the on-scene commander of the evidence recovery efforts.[
citation needed]
Anthrax archive destroyed
The FBI and
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) both gave permission for Iowa State University to destroy the Iowa anthrax archive and the archive was destroyed on October 10 and 11, 2001.
[83]
The FBI and CDC investigation was hampered by the destruction of a large collection of anthrax spores collected over more than seven decades and kept in more than 100 vials at
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Many scientists claim that the quick destruction of the anthrax spores collection in Iowa eliminated crucial evidence useful for the investigation. A precise match between the strain of anthrax used in the attacks and a strain in the collection would have offered hints as to when bacteria had been isolated and, perhaps, as to how widely it had been distributed to researchers. Such genetic clues could have given investigators the evidence necessary to identify the perpetrators.
[83]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks#Evidence_of_consciousness_of_guilt
In 2002, researchers did not believe it was possible to distinguish between anthrax variants.
[121] In January 2002, Ivins suggested that DNA sequencing should show differences in the genetics of anthrax mutations which would allow the source to be identified. Despite researchers advising the FBI that this may not have been possible, Ivins tutored agents on how to recognize them. Considered cutting edge at the time, this technique is now commonplace.
[121] In February 2002, Ivins volunteered to provide samples from several variants of the Ames strain in order to compare their morphs. He submitted two test tube "slants" each from four samples of the Ames strain in his collection. Two of the slants were from flask RMR-1029. Although the slants from flask RMR-1029 were later reported to be a positive match, all eight slants were reportedly in the wrong type of test tube and would therefore not be usable as evidence in court. On March 29, 2002, Ivins's boss instructed Ivins and others in suites B3 and B4 on how to properly prepare slants for the FBI Repository. The subpoena also included instructions on the proper way to prepare slants. When Ivins was told that his February samples did not meet FBIR requirements, he prepared eight new slants. The two new slants prepared from flask RMR-1029 submitted in April by Ivins did not contain the mutations that were later determined to be in flask RMR-1029.
[122][123]
It was reported that in April 2004, Henry Heine found a test tube in the lab containing anthrax and contacted Ivins.
[121] In an email sent in reply, Ivins reportedly told him it was probably RMR-1029 and for Heine to forward a sample to the FBI.
[121] Doubts regarding the reliability of the FBI tests were later raised when the FBI tested Heine's sample and a further one from Heine's test tube: one tested negative and one positive.
[121]
...
which super power could afford to NOT be studying coronavirus, common flu, hemorrhagic fevers, anthrax, etc ...
everyone would have had coronavirus