Concerning MR's ban

Status
Not open for further replies.
C'mon you brag like you have the I.Q. of 162 and over 9,000 books.


Reiterating shouldn't be a problem.
 
Since he's told you once and provided links to illustrate his point, why should he bother repeating it because you're to lazy and thick to get it the first time.
 
But he's already given you the information which shows he's not. You just want him to repeat it because you're a pain in the ass.
 
AlexG said:
Well that's dumb of you.
Click to expand...
Incredibly dumb.
Since she was too stupid/ dishonest/ lazy to bother reading/ understanding the first time it was explained to her there's no chance I'm going to do it again, especially since it's all available only a page or two back in this thread.
The attitude displayed here is one of the contributing factors to her ban on the other forum.
 
Beer w/Straw said:
Then you can reiterate.
Click to expand...

I'll do it for you:

Those misquotes you are talking about aren't attributed to MR. Those are often called scare quotes, which are quotes indicating a word is being used in an incorrect or ironic sense. Here's what they mean in this case:

MR's "crime" is to claim that he knows "the answer" while refusing any and all other explanations.
Click to expand...

MR is not really accused of any crime, so "crime" was in quotes to make it clear that it is not a true crime; more of an "internet crime." (IMPORTANT NOTE! Those quotes do NOT claim that you made that quote; they are, again, scare quotes.)

MR often claims he has an answer to anyone's questions/criticisms. Dwy does not believe it's really the answer, so he put it in quotes. He then gave examples of where MR did just that.

Any other questions?
 
On the other forum the final determination was that she (he?) was a troll and it was then banned. I guess it will take longer here for the moderators to come to that inevitable decision.
 
Also, legally, I am a retard. I just need a doctor's note. Which the doctor will give me. I am a disabled student.
 
Oystein said:
On the other forum the final determination was that she (he?) was a troll and it was then banned. I guess it will take longer here for the moderators to come to that inevitable decision.
Click to expand...

Except it seems there are enough others interested and playing along, that the following may once again apply...

Kittamaru said:
The rest he (James) decided was stuff that ya'll could fight and argue about in the thread and deal with yourselves.
Click to expand...

Squabbling about silly and insane "stuff" seems to be a favorite pastime....

Here's an idea let it die down to a monologue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top