Concerning MR's ban

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kittamaru said:
It has actually been reported, and was assigned to Bells (who has been very vocal that I should not be a moderator at all) - she has chosen not to act upon it *shrug*
My thoughts on how the thread went down?

Spellbound post simply that he "loves the Lord" - not much of a conversation piece to be honest, but hardly different from someone saying they love Mac n Cheese or the like.

The problem is, in post 4, he claimed him to be a real entity, yet provided no evidence to back that claim.
Click to expand...

As I said in the report you assigned to me.. It is in the religion sub-forum, for which you are a moderator. And that you should do your job because I am not the moderator of the religion sub-forum.

Please cease and desist with misrepresenting what I have actually said and stop attributing things to me that I have never said. And stop with the obscene inferences and insinuations that I am getting kickbacks. That is a very serious allegation and unless you can back it up with some evidence, stop making them. You know the rules of extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary evidence, Kitta? Apply that to yourself right now.
 
Magical Realist said:
More like your twisted interpretations of facts. Like how sea otters explain rock-throwing in the Oklahoma mountains. Or how bigfoot is impossible because of inbreeding. Etc and ect and etc.
Click to expand...
Bigfoot does not exist. It is a total delusional artifact.

DNA Study Proves Bigfoot Never Existed:

Curse you, reliable DNA studies! Must you spoil all the fun?
This Beluga Whale Photobombed the Connecticut GovernorLook How Hard This Beagle Puppy Works to Keep the Car Window OpenStudy Says 90% of Seabirds Have Ingested PlasticFatal Flaws? Questions Raised About Blood-Clot Filter NBC NewsTesla's Model 3 to Cost $35K, Preorders Start in March NBC NewsClerk Asks Judge For Way Out of Gay-Marriage Order, Again NBC News
In a stunning finding that set off shock waves of grieving through much of the world, University of Oxford researchers announced that the beloved bipedal cryptid known globally as Bigfoot is dead—or, more specifically, that he never existed.

Mr. Foot, who also went by the name Sasquatch, or Sásq’ets in the original Halkomelem, was 4,000 years old. Or maybe not.

The Oxford finding was the result of a three-year study that began in 2012 when researchers issued an open call for hair samples held in museums and private collections that were said to come from “an anomalous primate,” which is the kind of term scientists from a place like Oxford University often use when they’re publishing a peer-reviewed paper on, you know, Bigfoot, and don’t want to be snickered at by other Oxford University scientists in the faculty lounge. Thirty-six samples from the U.S., Russia, Indonesia, India, Bhutan and Nepal were ultimately submitted, a geographical range that suggested a) there was more than one “anomalous primate” out there, b) there is only one, but he is really, really well-traveled, c) there’s a teensy-weensy chance the hairs came from something else.

To find out, the investigators conducted DNA analyses on the samples and compared their findings to those of known species of animals. As it turned out they got some hits—a lot of them actually. The samples, the investigators found, came from animals as diverse as bears, wolves, raccoons, porcupine, deer, sheep, at least one human, and a cow. Again, that’s a cow.

The news was met with something less than universal acceptance that the long-rumored 10-ft. tall, 500-lb. creature with a two-ft. footprint, a coat of reddish brown hair, the sagittal crest of a gorilla and an unpleasant smell just might not exist. “The fact that none of these samples turned out to be [Bigfoot] doesn’t mean the next one won’t,” said no less a person than Bryan Sykes, the Oxford researcher who led the study, according to the Associated Press.

The Guardian headlined its story on the announcement “DNA analysis indicates Bigfoot may be a big fake,” begging the question of what it might take to warrant a headline that Bigfoot is a big fake.

None of that will do much to relieve the grief in the parts of Bigfoot-loving community that do, reluctantly, accept the Oxford team’s findings. As yet, Bigfoot intimates Kraken, Wendigo, Yeti and The Loch Ness Monster have issued no statement and have not returned calls or e-mails requesting comments. That could, scientific literalists suggest, indicate that they don’t exist either. But really, they’ve probably just gone into seclusion.
 
8 months later. Abusive moderator gone. And I'm still posting threads in the Fringe section only without harassment and being infracted. We all know what changed. I stand vindicated.
 
Last edited:
Magical Realist said:
8 months later. Abusive moderator gone. And I'm still posting threads in the Fringe section only without harassment and being infracted. We all know what changed. I stand vindicated.
Click to expand...

*snrk* You may believe whatever delusion of grandeur you wish; however, I am hardly "gone". I simply requested to have the job of trying to clean the detritus from your personal little dumping ground removed from my duties.

Given that you continue to refuse to acknowledge simple facts and instead preach your own personal brand of foolishness, I think the only one who "stands vindicated" are those of us who refute your unfounded and disproven claims.
 
I hope, MR, is not permanently banned. I have not followed all of the posts. But, in my opinion, added a distinct characteristic. I think he was honest in believing in... bullshit.

:EDIT:

Maybe I read the title of the thread and got confused.
 
Last edited:
I'd prefer the woo peddlers go find a forum more suited to their unfounded beliefs.

At least the pseudoscientist crackpots pretend to be interested in science.
 
Beer w/Straw said:
I hope, MR, is not permanently banned. I have not followed all of the posts. But, in my opinion, added a distinct characteristic. I think he was honest in believing in... bullshit.

:EDIT:

Maybe I read the title of the thread and got confused.
Click to expand...

They quit trying to make up excuses to ban me when Bells finally called them out on it. I'm not going anywhere.
 
Mod Note

This issue was, well, sort of resolved months ago.

There is absolutely no need to rehash what is past.

Bridges were broken and burned in the backroom and those bridges have yet to be rebuilt. I have absolute no intention of rehashing it and reliving what was something that nearly saw me leave this place for good. What's been done and said is in the past. Let's just leave it behind us where it belongs.

Thread closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top