I have a good teaching example, of this topic based, on current events. Have you noticed lately that global warming has been rebranded or repackaged and is now called climate change? The reason is the hard data clearly indicates that the earth has not warmed in the past two decades even though large countries like India and China have been building huge economies with fossil fuel. The rebranding, like the new and improved Coke, was needed because even the layman could see that the latest data did not support the old branding, even though many of the young scientists, would still blindly follow the old brand regardless of the facts.
The climate change brand was chosen because it is more nebulous, since weather has always been fickle and there is always something unpredictable happening somewhere. Global warming was too specific, while the new brand called climate change is fuzzy. Since the global warming brand was taken away, did the consensus who supported the old brand apologize to all the scientists who risked it all for the truth that finally appeared? Did the hacks at the top, who led the old brand get demoted, and were they replaced by those scientists who showed character under fire and who got it right based on history? The answer is no because of brain dead young scientists, who were never taught to think in an independent way by the scammers who rebranded themselves like a bankrupt company trying to avoid debt.
