Answer the question.

Motor Daddy said:
"Storing" and "it can" are words best used for potential energy...but, you know we're not talking about your fantasies in the future, right? We are talking about measured real world work that was done, not your fantasy land dream world.
Click to expand...
OK. So you can't answer the question. That's what you should work on.
 
billvon said:
"How much electrical energy does a charged 24kwhr battery contain" is something a first year physics student can understand and answer. Again, work on that.
Click to expand...

Again with your potential crap.

Potential is not work. Do you not understand that???
 
Motor Daddy said:
There ya go! All this for that? Really?
Click to expand...
Yes, MDT, it was all for that. Now see if you can integrate what you have learned (if anything.)
Right, we aren't talking about potential.
Click to expand...
Yes, we were. Temperature is a measure of heat content - and heat content is potential energy. (The term "energy" encompasses both potential and kinetic.) Again, basic high school physics.
 
billvon said:
Yes, MDT, it was all for that. Now see if you can integrate what you have learned (if anything.)

Yes, we were. Temperature is a measure of heat content - and heat content is potential energy. (The term "energy" encompasses both potential and kinetic.) Again, basic high school physics.
Click to expand...

Laughable!!

Learn what a unit of energy is. Start with a kw-hr. Let me know when you figure it out. Good luck.
 
billvon said:
Same old Motirdaddy T.
Click to expand...

Same ol' billvon, reduced to name-calling after his ego gets bruised, due to nobody's fault but his own ignorance of basic physics. 3rd grade physics is challenging for billvon, so he ignored that "simple stuff" and moved on to the really big words where he can use them and not have to explain what they mean. Because, you know, those simple little derivatives are child's play.

Get a clue!
 
in reply to sideshowbob, re: your # 19 reply


Well written...and well stated! Kudos to you. (if had a handle/avatar, yours would do nicely...I'm jealous) (also, do you know all the verses of the H.M.S. "Pinafore?")



(Thanks for reading!)
 
AlexG said:
No, he really is.
Click to expand...

I disagree. Why does he reply by challenging me to define torque to him, out of the blue?. He just wants to annoy and keep the argument going as long as he can. Motor Daddy does this all over the forum, constantly, introducing a new side-track whenever the argument is in any danger of running out of steam. This is absolutely textbook troll behaviour and it wrecks the credibility of the forum to allow it continue as it is currently doing.

(The only reason I got involving in this thread was I saw a nice opportunity to explain some thermodynamic principles simply, for other readers who might have accidentally stumbled into the morass of deliberate stupidity created by this fuckwit.)
 
exchemist said:
I disagree. Why does he reply by challenging me to define torque to him, out of the blue?. He just wants to annoy and keep the argument going as long as he can. Motor Daddy does this all over the forum, constantly, introducing a new side-track whenever the argument is in any danger of running out of steam. This is absolutely textbook troll behaviour and it wrecks the credibility of the forum to allow it continue as it is currently doing.

(The only reason I got involving in this thread was I saw a nice opportunity to explain some thermodynamic principles simply, for other readers who might have accidentally stumbled into the morass of deliberate stupidity created by this fuckwit.)
Click to expand...

Your ability to insult exceeds your display of torque knowledge. But I kinda figured that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top