Abuse of Power by Kittamaru

[Kittamaru]

This is bad, very bad attempt by you to silence others, and within minutes you banned me.

You can do anything to defend your stand, that is continued abuse of Power.

I will respond on that thread with DaveC, Origin, mine and Sarkus posts in quote. You will see what Sarkus wrote (correct initial conditions for escape which I was emphasizing) and what your troll friends wrote.

And even after a temp ban for it, you IMMEDIATELY take to insulting people again.

do not let your troll friends to come and say that this is an arXiv paper...

And a second time.

The God, are you simply that arrogant (which, given your username, I would have no problem believing), or that incapable of understanding, that you do not see you are running afoul, repeatedly, of the most basic of forum rules?

Now, as I have been saying it all boils down to initial conditions, all examples like apollo fuel burning or third body assist or any other force is just to create the suitable capture conditions. In fact the configuration of 3-body capture (2 bodies capturing a third body) as being pushed by your friends is most unstable with a huge possibility of ejection of the lighter of the pre existing 2-bodies. Well that is too complicated for your friends.

And when you have been asked to show this mythical example, you refused to do so repeatedly. .. I wonder why that is.

 

[The God]

And even after a temp ban for it, you IMMEDIATELY take to insulting people again.



And a second time.

The God, are you simply that arrogant (which, given your username, I would have no problem believing), or that incapable of understanding, that you do not see you are running afoul, repeatedly, of the most basic of forum rules?


And when you have been asked to show this mythical example, you refused to do so repeatedly. .. I wonder why that is.

I repeatedly asked you to show me where I am incorrect, which you claimed in your infraction post. [Mind you, I did not question your infraction, I questioned about inaccuracies], instead of substantiating your claims you prevented me from posting in that thread and bombarded me with your useless verbose posts.

Calling someone troll is insulting, then almost everyone involved is insulting each other. Look at the 'geon', how origin is attempting to troll him (geon) by calling him Reiku! But you will allow that.

Now please let me know whether I was wrong...

 

[Kittamaru]

I repeatedly asked you to show me where I am incorrect, which you claimed in your infraction post. [Mind you, I did not question your infraction, I questioned about inaccuracies], instead of substantiating your claims you prevented me from posting in that thread and bombarded me with your useless verbose posts.

Calling someone troll is insulting, then almost everyone involved is insulting each other. Look at the 'geon', how origin is attempting to troll him (geon) by calling him Reiku! But you will allow that.

Now please let me know whether I was wrong...

I would recommend re-reading the first few posts of this very thread, since I already did that.

Now, do you intend to start participating honestly?

As for geon - I haven't seen any reports on that, and it had not been brought to my attention. I am not omnipresent on the forums. By compare, before you were removed from it, you had garnered half a dozen reports in that one thread, from a multitude of members.

Perhaps if you would quit the victim act, folks might take you seriously.

 

[The God]

I would recommend re-reading the first few posts of this very thread, since I already did that.

Now, do you intend to start participating honestly?

As for geon - I haven't seen any reports on that, and it had not been brought to my attention. I am not omnipresent on the forums. By compare, before you were removed from it, you had garnered half a dozen reports in that one thread, from a multitude of members.

Perhaps if you would quit the victim act, folks might take you seriously.

I am participating very honestly, I do not change track. I standby all the claims I made in that thread and on this thread, you pin pointed two points, which also I clarified.

I am not acting as victim, I am claiming that you abused your power without demonstrating the correctness of your assessment. I certainly do not care about members like Sweetpeas, Kristoffers, Origins, Exchemists and DaveCs to take me seriously or not, none of them have proved any mettle here.

Search about all the threads I have initiated on science section and see the replies and views. Probably one thread alone of mine will have more replies and more views then all the threads of these named people put together. Let the site owners decide whether they want me here or whether they want these type of guys here. You do not, because you are prejudiced, as I have taken you on many a times in the past. None of these guys have disputed your stand, so you are with them. But thats how life is, Kittamaru.

 

[The God]

Geon issue which you are not aware of, thats quite likely and fair as you cannot be present everywhere.

Post #8 in below thread by 'origin' is flaming, trolling and unnecessary..if not please let me know.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/towards-a-quantum-theory-of-the-geon.159816/#post-3472564

 

[Bells]

Mod Note

Geon issue which you are not aware of, thats quite likely and fair as you cannot be present everywhere.

Post #8 in below thread by 'origin' is flaming, trolling and unnecessary..if not please let me know.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/towards-a-quantum-theory-of-the-geon.159816/#post-3472564

You filed a report and we are looking into it. To wit, in this instance, Origin was not flaming or trolling but instead raised a very valid and pertinent point that we are now investigating. So in a way, I guess I should thank you for bringing it to our attention.

 

[origin]

Mod Note



You filed a report and we are looking into it. To wit, in this instance, Origin was not flaming or trolling but instead raised a very valid and pertinent point that we are now investigating. So in a way, I guess I should thank you for bringing it to our attention.

Huh?
Oh, it was just 'the god', I got him on ignore and did not know why my name came up...

 

[The God]

Mod Note



You filed a report and we are looking into it. To wit, in this instance, Origin was not flaming or trolling but instead raised a very valid and pertinent point that we are now investigating. So in a way, I guess I should thank you for bringing it to our attention.

So alleging something publicly without substantiating is ok as per you Bells? That too repeatedly, see post #141 in below thread.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/qm-randomness.159457/page-8

Your colleague Kittamaru, is also accused of making statements without substantiating, now it is proved that he was utterly unsjustifief so after making some more noise here and there he has vanished.

 

[Kittamaru]

So alleging something publicly without substantiating is ok as per you Bells? That too repeatedly, see post #141 in below thread.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/qm-randomness.159457/page-8

Your colleague Kittamaru, is also accused of making statements without substantiating, now it is proved that he was utterly unsjustifief so after making some more noise here and there he has vanished.

I have hardly vanished - I simply haven't seen anything new of merit from you worth refuting. Thus far, all you have done is beat your chest and screamed.

 

[The God]

I have hardly vanished - I simply haven't seen anything new of merit from you worth refuting. Thus far, all you have done is beat your chest and screamed.

Post #40 is not chest thumping, it is substantiated with reference and exposes your false claim about inaccuracies in my posts. That reference or example looks mythical to you, kittamaru?

 

[Bells]

Mod Note

So alleging something publicly without substantiating is ok as per you Bells? That too repeatedly, see post #141 in below thread.

I hardly see his asking if it is Reiku is alleging something without substantiating it.

Meanwhile, you have started this thread, accused a member of staff of abuse of power without any supporting evidence aside from the fact that he was forced to moderate you for abusing others and failing to support your claims, you have leveled accusations and abused other members and staff (for no reason aside from the fact that they disagree with you), you have were blocked from replying to at least one thread that I know of for making unsupported claims and abusing staff and members alike and refused to provide any evidence to support your claims despite repeated requests that you do so..

Are you sure you wish to go down this road with this particular whine about "alleging something publicly without substantiating" it? Really?

Let me assure you, The God, this is the last thing you should be doing and this is the worst path you could possibly go down with your complaint.

You asked:

Geon issue which you are not aware of, thats quite likely and fair as you cannot be present everywhere.

Post #8 in below thread by 'origin' is flaming, trolling and unnecessary..if not please let me know.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/towards-a-quantum-theory-of-the-geon.159816/#post-3472564

And I responded and "let you know" the response. Origin was not flaming or trolling. Instead, you are the one with every appearance of flaming and trolling.

My advice to you, Sir, is to quit while you are behind.

 

[timojin]

Mod Note


I hardly see his asking if it is Reiku is alleging something without substantiating it.

Meanwhile, you have started this thread, accused a member of staff of abuse of power without any supporting evidence aside from the fact that he was forced to moderate you for abusing others and failing to support your claims, you have leveled accusations and abused other members and staff (for no reason aside from the fact that they disagree with you), you have were blocked from replying to at least one thread that I know of for making unsupported claims and abusing staff and members alike and refused to provide any evidence to support your claims despite repeated requests that you do so..

Are you sure you wish to go down this road with this particular whine about "alleging something publicly without substantiating" it? Really?

Let me assure you, The God, this is the last thing you should be doing and this is the worst path you could possibly go down with your complaint.

You asked:



And I responded and "let you know" the response. Origin was not flaming or trolling. Instead, you are the one with every appearance of flaming and trolling.

My advice to you, Sir, is to quit while you are behind.

Pal don't argue with the woman . Stay in the forum you are more valuable than it.

In my language there is a saying " step aside for a Woman and a drunk"

 

[Kittamaru]

Post #40 is not chest thumping, it is substantiated with reference and exposes your false claim about inaccuracies in my posts. That reference or example looks mythical to you, kittamaru?

The only thing that looks mythical to me is your claim that a two body system can spontaneously achieve orbit from a fly-by posture.

 

[James R]

It appears that this thread is serving two purposes for The God: (1) to continue trolling and insulting of the moderation team, (2) to continue to discuss a topic from which he was thread-banned.

To The God:

You have accumulated no less than 60 warnings from moderators during your time here. And yet, you do not learn.

Now is the time for you to pull your head in. You have become a constant drain on moderator resources, and we will not continue to tolerate this. You will change, or you will leave. The choice is up to you.

This thread is closed.