I don’t know off-hand.What would the motive be for NASA to falsify images of Earth?
But why do show us the image of earth at all if they have to photo shop it?
I don’t know off-hand.What would the motive be for NASA to falsify images of Earth?
Don’t worry Alex, I’m not one who praises smartness. It has its place.I know I am not smart but it's great you get some benefit.
You didn’t create that property for wasps and snakes to live on.
That’s only your property in a legal sense. Nothing in this material world belongs to you.
You are simply a guest, in God’s manifestation.
Try again,
It’s the times we live.Stop putting yourself down.
Maybe you need to re-check, so you can comment more accurately.I think so.
Another thing I like about your character.Of course I am not serious I thought that was clear.
That’s my whole point.So your saying that I am an atheist.
He doesn’t accept the “theory” of evolution (darwinism). He accept “evolution”.Ray Comfort?
Now who’s putting them self down?I know I am not smart but it's great you get some benefit.
It was a theist who coined the term “science”, let alone anything else.
You compared your with idea of the love of God I put forward. You likened allowing wasps and snake to live in your property was no more an act of love, than God allowing His souls to live in a material world.You demonstrate two things with that response, the first being your inability to grasp the example I gave, which does not compare me to God and secondly, your ongoing inability to distinguish the meaning of words in the English language, which was the reason for the example.
Evolution is fine. Everybody in the world accepts it. Darwinism is whack.
It's truly amazing the number of things you get wrong, but pray tell, who was that person, what was their name and what was their religion, since you claim to believe you know?
It’s of no interest to me to do that.Please then, do us the honor of briefly explaining in your own words the difference between the two and why one is accepted and the other is whack?
You compared your with idea of the love of God I put forward. You likened allowing wasps and snake to live in your property was no more an act of love, than God allowing His souls to live in a material world.
Secondly you are simply buying into this mischaracterisation of me changing the English language to suit my purpose. An illusion popularised by James R.
But you, he, or anyone, has yet to show this is the case.
Okay let’s not indulge in the “big C” just as yet.An Atheist conspiracy? Yeahhh, that's it. Science is always falsifying things. They even admit it...![]()
Oh well!As expected, you got that wrong like you get so many things wrong. You don't even bother to read your own sources.
"Whewell came up with the term scientist itself in 1833"
It was an example showing your inability to distinguish the meaning of words in the English language.
Lol. The dictionary proves you've changed the words to suit your purpose, which would be yet more proof you have yet to crack one open.
And, you continue to promote your deception.
It’s of no interest to me
Maybe you can explain why you think I’m wrong.
Oh well!
Still a theist.
Deception is your line of work.All of this time, while you continued to promote your deception,
Just that line alone, informs me I would be wasting my time.you could have come up with other examples of Gods love, but failed to do that, as well.
As expected. Not one example to back your illusion.
No they weren’t.So was Darwin, so what. Everyone was a theist back then.
And a damn good job you did!It’s of no interest to me to do that.
Already done that.