think that we need less science and more reality i dont care about any type of science
Hundreds of years of science are responsible for you being able to type on your computer that you don't care about science - ironic, no?
think that we need less science and more reality i dont care about any type of science
hundreds of years of science and a computer is your answer i dont need a computerHundreds of years of science are responsible for you being able to type on your computer that you don't care about science - ironic, no?
Originally Posted by Fraggle Rocker
The most succinct definition of life is "a sustained local reversal of entropy," and civilization is certainly that.
What makes life unique is that is uses energy to lower entropy and increase its energy content (growth). Since this moves in opposite direction of the universal flow of energy and entropy, life set up two potentials that will need to reverse.
As a way to visualize, say we had a fountain that pumped water upward. This will take energy. It will not happen spontaneously, since the water prefers to remain at lowest gravitational potential.
Since the water is being pumped in the opposite direction of gravity, there is a cause and effect potential to go back downward. This potential will increase the higher we pump the water. We can use the energy within this descending water to drive water wheels. This wil increase the entropy since some of the energy will be irreversibly lost by the water wheels.
If we shut off the pump, we will take away all the potential energy. This removes the cascade of water, which drives the water wheels, resulting in an inanimate tower of wheels near a quiet pond. The fountain comes to life only after we sets the initial water potentials.
The modern animal cell's main pump, for the fountain analogy, are the sodium/potassium pumps. These will create potentials within energy and entropy. Since the universe prefers lower energy and higher entropy, the energy/entropy potential created by the cationic pumps will need to descend in potential. This is used by the cell to drive all types of analogies to the water wheels. Evolution makes the pumping action and the descent of the potentials, more efficient as time does on.
The neuron has the highest membrane potential of the cells in the human body. These cells pump the highest in terms of the energy/entropy potential. This allows the descending potential cascade that is called consciousness. The mind, in turn, follows the schema.
hundreds of years of science and a computer is your answer i dont need a computer
This is pure BS.
@ Sciwriter,
You've made me curious because of the passages you highlighted. If you are going to suggest cells have their own consciousness and engram memories then L.Ron Hubbard beat you to it when he wrote Dianetics.
i do not need a computer i stay away from texting and i certainly dont watch tv i do not need them sort of things or gadgets as some will call
think that we need less science and more reality i dont care about any type of science
Information is never exchanged using oxygen
No we don't.
No we dont
We already are..
Complete rubbish. Learn some biology.
When the word evolution is used it conjures pictures of monkeys and cave men. What if we are evolving and have lost the significance of it because of its scale? That is, what does a blood cell know of a brain cell unless it’s exchanging oxygen? Single cells in our bodies don’t have the conciseness to know the big picture. Even a neuron can not know what thought the whole brain is manifesting, or does it. As Marshall McLuhan suggested that we constantly create “extensions” of our body…. What of the mind.
We share one giant immune system (the CDC and AMA) and other systems that aid our survival as a species. Our social glue has enabled the evolutionary leap several times only we don’t know just as a cell in the body didn’t know when we began to think. Perhaps “Group Conciseness” is in operation. Our situation is tied to our information gathering and storage.
Humans start out from the memory found in the DNA, RNA, and biological levels of information. One would live a life and accumulate personal knowledge that would be pasted poorly from one person to another.
Not until speech was incorporated into our list of accumulated knowledge did we begin to start the real path that has led us to present. The same leap was made when writing was added, only it accumulated our knowledge through time and space. That is, one person could write down things that could be read after he was dead and copies could travel faster than he. The acquisition, storage, and distribution of information while is constant. The printing press made the info available to more people faster and saved the info in redundant copies so a new level of permanence was achieved. The phone moved the voice further. Wire, tape, vinyl, and eventually digital storage material made our libraries of experience into Human Memory that is the shared Species Experience every child inherits.
We store information essential to our survival and all of the other species. The knowledge of one person added to another and on and on, connected to the power of the internet had raised us to a new level. The entire system requires the glue of social trust and interaction. This “Group Consciousness” is more like unconsciousness. This may be the reason we don’t see the next evolutionary leap as we become a sort of multi-celled organism, like the fish in the water… never discovering water.
I noticed Wellwisher never responds (that I know of). He just injudiciously applies his misunderstanding of entropy to just about everthing.
entropy is defined as the amount of additional information needed to specify the exact physical state of a system, given its thermodynamic specification.
No it doesn't.I prefer to define entropy in terms of increased degrees of freedom, which amounts to the same thing as the amount of information
Just because you prefer your "definition" doesn't make it correct. Or worthwhile.needed to the specify the exact physical state of a system. Degrees of freedom is easier to apply.
A cell is not a closed system, you're not considering all sources and sinks.It is hard to repond to criticism like "this is pure BS" since that logic is beyond reproof.
Trippy has studied Entropy both as a chemist and as a physicist, hence my BS meter reaching critical levels.Trippy is needs to learn about entropy before organizing his eloquent criticisms.
Though if ya kill a person, their cells die, but one 'cell' of this superorganism could live on even if all the other 'cells' died. There is no top down control either. Or at least nothing on the order of, say, the neuroendocrine system.I have for several years been saying on SciForums and elsewhere that civilization is a superorganism and we are its cells.
Well, unless you are living in a in some cave subsiting in a stone age lifestyle then you have to thank science for your existence.Sorry.:shrug:
When the word evolution is used it conjures pictures of monkeys and cave men. What if we are evolving and have lost the significance of it because of its scale? ...