Magical Realist
Valued Senior Member
Nonstop 24 hour coverage of this damn balloon by CNN. Are we a bored nation or what?
Last edited:
So, why put it here. Its's off topicNonstop 24 hour coverage on this damn balloon by CNN. Are we a bored nation or what?
You used "an" instead of "a". I'm curious how you pronounce "uap".The Chinese balloon is not an uap
It's as if they think the Air Force wont notice some big ass balloon
I actually reread what I typed and stuck the 'n' there for some reason. I don't know.You used "an" instead of "a". I'm curious how you pronounce "uap".
Is it ... " an Ooapp"?
Indeed.A question: Where did it begin route and if a balloon can travel freely into our air space, what else could potentially come in with something of this nature? Airborne chemicals, airborne virus', etc?
Indeed.
Or simply a bomb.
Which is why it caused so much alarm.
I doubt a bomb, but I'm fairly sure virus' and chemicals could be delivered by this method, which also makes shooting it down a bit of a risk.
A question: Where did it begin route and if a balloon can travel freely into our air space, what else could potentially come in with something of this nature? Airborne chemicals, airborne virus', etc?
Living in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S., I can tell you that a Russian peat fire smells a litte different than a Canadian forest fire.
The only successful mainland attack I ever heard of by the Japanese against the U.S. during WWII was a balloon-delivered bomb that killed six in Oregon.
As a general proposition, lots of stuff can make it. Chemicals, yes. Virus, most likely not. As a general proposition, just watch the weather over the Pacific; that will give you some idea of what can make it where. But as a tactical consideration, releasing sufficient chemical or biological weapon into the atmosphere to travel that far and be effective is the stuff of dereliction and madness.