I agreed with your sentence in post #197 that I quoted in my post #198, because I understood what you said, but added another perspective to it. Perhaps that may have escaped you?
Explain again .
I agreed with your sentence in post #197 that I quoted in my post #198, because I understood what you said, but added another perspective to it. Perhaps that may have escaped you?
A condition does not necessarily have be of a physical nature. It can be an abstraction like our concept of 3 dimensions, like length, width, and height.Explain again .
river said: ↑
Explain again .
A condition does not necessarily have be of a physical nature. It can be an abstraction like our concept of 3 dimensions, like length, width, and height.
Right. They are not physical objects themselves. Same as Time is a measurement of a chronologyFirst , three dimensions is not an abstraction . 3 dimensions is fundamental to any existence of anything . Throughout the Universe .
I submit that it is the other way around.A condition is fundamentally based on the experience of the physical .
New
↑
First , three dimensions is not an abstraction . 3 dimensions is fundamental to any existence of anything . Throughout the Universe .
Right. They are not physical objects themselves. Same as Time is a measurement of a chronology
Yes, they are the non-physical 3 spatial dimensions plus 1 temporal permission that guide the expressions of the physical Universe. The conditions that are the non-physical (abstract) properties of the universe.But they are what make up the physical Universe
Yes, they are the non-physical 3 spatial dimensions plus 1 temporal permission that guide the expressions of the physical Universe. The conditions that are the non-physical (abstract) properties of the universe.
No, no, the three dimensions exist independent of any physical presence. These are your words and I agree.No they are not non-physical 3 dimensions . The physical came first not the dimensions . The 3 dimensions are based on the physical . Not mathematics dimensions .
3 dimensions is fundamental to any existence of anything . Throughout the Universe .
While I agree also with your general point, I would argue that dimension (3d volume etc) is directly contingent upon material substance.No, no, the three dimensions exist independent of any physical presence.
I understand the argument. But IMO, a "length" is not a material object. It is a measurement of a material object.I would argue that dimension (3d volume etc) is directly contingent upon material substance.
Take all of the substance out of this universe and you get zero dimensions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DimensionIn physics and mathematics, the dimension of a mathematical space (or object) is informally defined as the minimum number of coordinates needed to specify any point within it. ... The concept of dimension is not restricted to physical objects.
No they are not non-physical 3 dimensions . The physical came first not the dimensions . The 3 dimensions are based on the physical . Not mathematics dimensions .
No, no, the three dimensions exist independent of any physical presence. These are your words and I agree.
Write4U said: ↑
Yes, they are the non-physical 3 spatial dimensions plus 1 temporal permission that guide the expressions of the physical Universe. The conditions that are the non-physical (abstract) properties of the universe.
I understand the argument. But IMO, a "length" is not a material object. It is a measurement of a material object.
Allow me another example.
Is "displacement" a material substance or a dimensional measurement? It is directly contingent upon a material object replacing a certain volume of space or substance.
But these measurements are not material objects, in and of themselves. They are abstract mathematics.
Are dimensions physical?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension
W4U said: No, no, the three dimensions exist independent of any physical presence. These are your words and I agree.
Here
No they don't . The three dimensional physical existence is more than a presence , it is .
Here
p.s. When I use the term "abstract" I mean non-physical, not some mystical thought process.
Dimensions have no energy. They are arbitrary non-physical measurements in spacetime geometry.P.S. non-physical is not possible . No matter the energy level .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeometryGeometry (from the Ancient Greek: γεωμετρία; geo- "earth", -metron "measurement") is, with arithmetic, one of the oldest branches of mathematics. It is concerned with properties of space that are related with distance, shape, size, and relative position of figures.[1] A mathematician who works in the field of geometry is called a geometer.
Dimensions have no energy. They are arbitrary non-physical measurements in spacetime geometry.
Geometry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometry
p.s. remember that the map is not the real thing.
But we are not talking about three dimensional objects. We are talking about "dimensions" of objects and are not objects in and of themselves.Your right dimensions have no energy unto themselves . But the physical three dimensional object does .
But we are not talking about three dimensional objects. We are talking about "dimensions" of objects and are not objects in and of themselves.
Perhaps that was causal to the BB? The universe wanted to matter?For these dimensions to matter at all , means that they must become physical in the end .
(free)— Hence paper would more accurately be called papering--to emphasize that it is always and inevitably a dynamic process undergoing perpetual change. Bohm ...
https://bhavanalearninggroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/LifeworkofDavidBohm.pdf