That's fine; everyone has an opinion. The two pathologists who examined the body thought otherwise.
So on one hand we have two medical experts who have trained to be able to determine cause of death, and have years of experience doing just that. They examined the body and determined that he had been suffocated due to pressure on his back.
On the other hand we have some guy on the Internet who has never seen the body and who has, at best, a Facebook MD, who thinks it was an overdose based on what he saw some other guy say on the Internet.
Not too hard to figure out who to believe. The jury, apparently, thought the same way. Good for them.
Was his windpipe collapsed? No. Did Chauvin cut off his blood supply to his brain? No.
What happens when a carotid artery is 100 percent blocked? It’s bad, but it’s not the end of the world. You’ve still have two other arteries, an internal and external carotid artery supplying blood flow to your brain.
The medical expert for the prosecution had to combine the weight on his back to describe compression and positional asphyxia. He said that the handcuffs are extremely important. It’s how officer Chauvin and officer King manipulate the handcuffs by pushing them into his back and pushing them high.
What Does It Really Take to Kill Someone With Compression Asphyxia?
It takes roughly 570lbs. It would take two 285-pound cops standing and balancing on the back or chest of a suspect to produce compression asphyxia.
This is what’s disturbing. In the beginning of
↱this video, it shows what’s occurring when he first said that he couldn’t breathe. You have to decide whether or not he’s lying at this point or is really experiencing some difficulty. Is he telling the truth? Is he having trouble breathing here at this point? The officers didn’t think so. They continued to assume he was lying even when they put him on the ground. If you think that he was having trouble breathing at this point, what was the cause?
Sadly, there are no anatomical findings of wooden chest during an autopsy because chest wall rigidity is lost after death. If it was opioid-induced chest wall rigidity, turning him on his side wouldn’t have saved him. CPR wouldn’t have saved him.
Could you make a case for the defendant not being guilty of the charges?
Yes, I think so.
He was sacrificed because the needs of the many outweighed the needs of the few.
As a juror, if you thought he wasn’t guilty, could you do the right thing?
Probably not because it would be too dangerous for you, your family, and your community.