Is LGBT a neurological misunderstanding ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark Turner

Banned
Banned
Neurological control and the ability to choose the correct neurological binary decision is neurological absolute and objectivity .

An incorrect choice of neurological binary choice can be considered neurologically subjective .

Is LGBT a neurological misunderstanding by lack of education on the neurological process ?

Thanks in advance .
 
Who decides what is an "incorrect choice"?


No.
Nobody decides what's an incorrect choice , objectivity defines the correct choice .
We are born with a blank canvas , a simple neurological design that can store information in the way of memory . If we take away our memory we revert back to neurological emptiness , an empty space that contains 0 information .
Free information is gained by our senses from birth , after that we develop our own thinking on what fits our own choice of lifestyle and neurological needs .
An ability to understand the neurological
process is an important aspect we need to educate ourselves with for the future .
 
Nobody decides what's an incorrect choice , objectivity defines the correct choice .
Adding the word "objectively" doesn't help your case.

If there is a "correct" choice then someone has decided what "correct" means, and to which "choice" it applies.

So who decides what is "objectively" a "correct choice". God presumably?

OK, but then you say this:

... we develop our own thinking on what fits our own choice ...
OK, so we each individually decide what the choice is for ourselves.

That is neither objective (it's subjective) nor correct (it's neither correct nor incorrect, merely a preference),
 
Nobody decides what's an incorrect choice , objectivity defines the correct choice .
Nope. For sexual orientation/identity there is no "correct choice."
We are born with a blank canvas
No, we're not. That's a common misconception. We are born with a lot of behaviors, drives and preferences built in. Those can be modified, of course - but we do not start out as a 'blank slate.'
a simple neurological design that can store information in the way of memory . If we take away our memory we revert back to neurological emptiness , an empty space that contains 0 information .
No such thing in humans.
An ability to understand the neurological process is an important aspect we need to educate ourselves with for the future .
Indeed.
 
Adding the word "objectively" doesn't help your case.

If there is a "correct" choice then someone has decided what "correct" means, and to which "choice" it applies.

So who decides what is "objectively" a "correct choice". God presumably?

OK, but then you say this:


OK, so we each individually decide what the choice is for ourselves.

That is neither objective (it's subjective) nor correct (it's neither correct nor incorrect, merely a preference),

An objective choice is not decided by anybody , it is decided by considering all the facts and logic that is involved in making any neurological binary choice.
In example , if a women was experiencing neurological erotica and was aroused whilst in a room occupied by nothing but other women , does this mean she is a lesbian ?
Of course not , no more than waking up alone with an erection means you fancy yourself .
My point being that neurological confusion of sexuality etc is a lack of education in the neurological processes .
In a persons years of puberty when emotions are running high , hormones can kick in anytime and neurological confusion can occur from this .
 
Nope. For sexual orientation/identity there is no "correct choice."

No, we're not. That's a common misconception. We are born with a lot of behaviors,

We are born with survival instincts that are in a sense behaviours , however that does not mean our neurological process contains any information . We gain neurological information by our senses and experiences , often a contributing factor in the developing of neurological maturity .
 
Can you provide an example of what you mean?
Of course , let's consider transgender , a person observes themselves in a mirror , objectively they see their own gender but their own neurological process is subjectively tricking them into thinking otherwise .
 
Of course , let's consider transgender , a person observes themselves in a mirror , objectively they see their own gender but their own neurological process is subjectively tricking them into thinking otherwise .
So, you're suggesting that the person who is identifying as LBGTQ, is experiencing a neurological ''misunderstanding?''
 
So, you're suggesting that the person who is identifying as LBGTQ, is experiencing a neurological ''misunderstanding?''
Indeed. And he doesn't stop there.
He goes on to suggest that LBGTQs should be re-educated, and that will fix them.
 
Indeed. And he doesn't stop there.
He goes on to suggest that LBGTQs should be re-educated, and that will fix them.
I did not suggest that present lgbtqs needs reeducating but perhaps we could introduce neurological awareness into the education system , such as primary schools.
 
Indeed. And he doesn't stop there.
He goes on to suggest that LBGTQs should be re-educated, and that will fix them.

Yea :redface:

I did not suggest that present lgbtqs needs reeducating but perhaps we could introduce neurological awareness into the education system , such as primary schools.

In hopes of ''correcting'' the ''problem'' that you think exists? :rolleye:

This has the makings of a creepy sci-fi novella. lol
 
Yea :redface:



In hopes of ''correcting'' the ''problem'' that you think exists? :rolleye:

This has the makings of a creepy sci-fi novella. lol
Strong neurological influence starts to have effect on humans from about the age of 13. It is important if we are going to evolve to stage 3 of neurological process to become much more objective applying scientific vigour .
The problem with neurological weakness , I.e giving in to subjectivity , is people have weak neurological immunity , you know , people can be easily offended by words etc .
The subject is vast , a set with many multiple components that make the point .
 
Strong neurological influence starts to have effect on humans from about the age of 13. It is important if we are going to evolve to stage 3 of neurological process to become much more objective applying scientific vigour .
The problem with neurological weakness , I.e giving in to subjectivity , is people have weak neurological immunity , you know , people can be easily offended by words etc .
The subject is vast , a set with many multiple components that make the point .

I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, but not sure if you realize how offensive this comes across. :/

Do you personally know anyone within the LGBTQ community?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top