Zack Smith
Registered Member
You've validated my assertion. Thanks.
You've validated my assertion. Thanks.
Funny. White supremacist violence is a far bigger risk for the US today than the big bogeyman of the right - Islamic terrorism. And yet we need a travel ban to stop _them._I should be asking you. Why do you think that white supremacists, who make up .00005% of the population, have any impact outside of the hysteria on the left?
Welp, that's a lie. Does 9/11 ring a bell. The Pulse night club shooting? Ft. Hood? San Bernadino? Boston Marathon bombers? I'm sure I'm missing some.Funny. White supremacist violence is a far bigger risk for the US today than the big bogeyman of the right - Islamic terrorism. And yet we need a travel ban to stop _them._
I've not researched it. I've also not seen any hysteria about the FreeMasons.How significant is Freemasonary in USA politics?
Forty million of them voted for Trump. That moved the needle.White supremacists don't even move the needle in America.
Your assertion that millions of Obama voters voted for Trump? I called bullshit.You've validated my assertion. Thanks.
They would be 15 - 20 % of the population. (Your number would be about 160+ people, but we recognize that your numbers or other "facts" are not supposed to be, like, accurate or anything.)Why do you think that white supremacists, who make up .00005% of the population, have any impact
Even including the original list of Muslim countries Trump tried to ban, they don't match the terrorism examples you posted.Trump was issuing a travel ban to the same 7 countries, that the Obama administration deemed to be terrorist states. The vast majority of Muslim countries were allowed to travel to the U.S.
LOL. Talk about being in conflict with the dictionary,Forty million of them voted for Trump. That moved the needle.
They also voted for W, which also moved the needle.
And they voted for the legislative opposition to Obama, which moved the needle.
Your assertion that millions of Obama voters voted for Trump? I called bullshit.
Your misuse of "irony"? That's impossible to validate - you are in conflict with the dictionary.
They would be 15 - 20 % of the population. (Your number would be about 160+ people, but we recognize that your numbers or other "facts" are not supposed to be, like, accurate or anything.)
And since they currently control the legislative and executive branches of the Federal government, their "impact" is pretty obvious.
Forty million of them voted for Trump. That moved the needle.
They also voted for W, which also moved the needle.
And they voted for the legislative opposition to Obama, which moved the needle.
Your assertion that millions of Obama voters voted for Trump? I called bullshit.
Your misuse of "irony"? That's impossible to validate - you are in conflict with the dictionary.
They would be 15 - 20 % of the population. (Your number would be about 160+ people, but we recognize that your numbers or other "facts" are not supposed to be, like, accurate or anything.)
And since they currently control the legislative and executive branches of the Federal government, their "impact" is pretty obvious.
Forty million of them voted for Trump. That moved the needle.
They also voted for W, which also moved the needle.
And they voted for the legislative opposition to Obama, which moved the needle.
Your assertion that millions of Obama voters voted for Trump? I called bullshit.
Your misuse of "irony"? That's impossible to validate - you are in conflict with the dictionary.
They would be 15 - 20 % of the population. (Your number would be about 160+ people, but we recognize that your numbers or other "facts" are not supposed to be, like, accurate or anything.)
And since they currently control the legislative and executive branches of the Federal government, their "impact" is pretty obvious.
Forty million of them voted for Trump. That moved the needle.
They also voted for W, which also moved the needle.
And they voted for the legislative opposition to Obama, which moved the needle.
Your assertion that millions of Obama voters voted for Trump? I called bullshit.
Your misuse of "irony"? That's impossible to validate - you are in conflict with the dictionary.
They would be 15 - 20 % of the population. (Your number would be about 160+ people, but we recognize that your numbers or other "facts" are not supposed to be, like, accurate or anything.)
And since they currently control the legislative and executive branches of the Federal government, their "impact" is pretty obvious.
Forty million of them voted for Trump. That moved the needle.
They also voted for W, which also moved the needle.
And they voted for the legislative opposition to Obama, which moved the needle.
Your assertion that millions of Obama voters voted for Trump? I called bullshit.
Your misuse of "irony"? That's impossible to validate - you are in conflict with the dictionary.
They would be 15 - 20 % of the population. (Your number would be about 160+ people, but we recognize that your numbers or other "facts" are not supposed to be, like, accurate or anything.)
And since they currently control the legislative and executive branches of the Federal government, their "impact" is pretty obvious.
Even including the original list of Muslim countries Trump tried to ban, they don't match the terrorism examples you posted.
Here are the countries associated with the US terrorism you mentioned - 9/11, Pulse nightclub, Fort Hood, San Bernadino, Boston Marathon.
9/11: Saudi Arabia mostly, Egypt, UAE, Lebanon. Also involved: Afghanistan, Germany, Pakistan.
Fort Hood: US born , Saudi-established mosque attendance, Palestinian parents.
Pulse: US born, Afghan parents.
San Bernadino: US born, Wahabi Sunni religious adherence, Pakistani parents // Pakistan born, lived in Saudi Arabia, educated in Pakistan.
Boston: Kalmyk Province and Kyrgyzstan born, lived in Dagestan, identified as Chechen.
None of those countries are on Trump's travel ban, original or amended version. Trump will probably never impose a travel ban on the most dangerous terrorism exporter of all - Saudi Arabia - because he does good business with them.
I should be asking you.
You could put them all in the Univerity of Michigan's football stadium , and you'd still have room.
Did you know that the KKK membership (5 K according to the SPLC ) is roughly the same as the Communist Party USA ( according to Wikipedia).
Both groups are irrelevant.
First off low IQ, I'm not a white supremacist.Yeah, too bad about that.
Vapid fallacy? As if that's new.
What I don't understand about white supremacists is that if you think you're right, why do you try to convince everyone of something else?
Assuming that that statement is true, what you should learn from it is that education in your hillbilly nation is inadequate.If you agree that liberal presidents win the 'non educated ' vote as well, I agree.
Yeah, too bad about that.
Vapid fallacy? As if that's new.
What I don't understand about white supremacists is that if you think you're right, why do you try to convince everyone of something else?
Assuming that that statement is true, what you should learn from it is that education in your hillbilly nation is inadequate.
Welp low IQ, it is true. The empirical data is from the New York Times. If you had any ounce of curiosity, you'd research it yourself. My guess is that you're too slothful.Assuming that that statement is true, what you should learn from it is that education in your hillbilly nation is inadequate.
What's more pertinent is the fact that refugees flee your country. We have people coming to Canada, losing fingers and toes to frostbite, risking death, to escape from that idiot in the White House.Why do foreigners come in droves to America, for higher education, if we're a hillbilly nation?