A plea

Bah.., but that was Enmos announcing his new position. Note that the OP speaks just about Enmos' mod position. It's not an admin's announcement. Like I said..they were still in the process of picking a few members.
 
Bah.., but that was Enmos announcing his new position. Note that the OP speaks just about Enmos' mod position. It's not an admin's announcement. Like I said..they were still in the process of picking a few members.
There were only TWO positions up for grabs.
How hard is it to say "sorry guy, YOU haven't got it"? even one at a time as the positions are decided?
 
Perhaps I'm a bit antisocial, but how is me announcing I got the position not announcing the others didn't get it?
 
Perhaps I'm a bit antisocial, but how is me announcing I got the position not announcing the others didn't get it?
I think that was sniffy's point.
Politeness would have been an official (i.e. from the mods) notice, privately, to each "candidate" letting them know before it was made public.
 
I think that was sniffy's point.
Politeness would have been an official (i.e. from the mods) notice, privately, to each "candidate" letting them know before it was made public.

Perhaps, but I don't think it's the big deal she made it to be.
I wouldn't have mind if someone else got it and I wasn't informed that I didn't get the position beforehand..
 
Bah, I can't say that I understand why anyone would care. But then again, I don't care about anything in particular. Easy easyyyyyy...baby!

Perhaps I'm a bit antisocial, but how is me announcing I got the position not announcing the others didn't get it?

Well, I don't recall..but did they tell us how many mods they were searching for? Because as it turned out they picked a lot more mods than I thought.
 
Well, I don't recall..but did they tell us how many mods they were searching for? Because as it turned out they picked a lot more mods than I thought.

They were looking for a mod for Free Thoughts and a mod for Art & Culture.
I don't know if they initially left open the option to appoint more than one mod per subforum.
My announcement thread pretty much informed the others that the position of Free Thoughts moderator was taken. I don't know why anyone would care whether they had been informed by the mods before I made the thread or by the thread :shrug:
 
You're a robot..one_raven. SLIGHT difference there. You all..don't exist! You're all just 01010101010101010111000011
Besides, one_raven...do you mean to infer that for you it doesn't matter how your loved one breaks up with you? I mean it doesn't matter to you that she just sends you an sms to tell you to fuck off forever, or would you prefer it if she'd told it directly to your face?

ANYWAY, lets move on:
STRYDER SAID:

So taking this into consideration how about changing the topic of this thread a little. How about the membership coming up with ideas on how things are suppose to be done as a SUGGESTION, prior to moderators and administration having to autonomously make the decision and be boo'd for it.

So we'll start it off, "How do you get (choose, pick, vote etc) new moderators on a forum?"

Take into consideration:

* They are unpaid
* They are volunteers
* They will likely have people hate them just for becoming one.
* They won't likely be chose if they have a long history with the moderators or administration
* They need to be popular with the forum members not just the moderators.
* They need to be trustworthy and genuine.


If the membership can create a 'Specification' then perhaps we can follow it.

I'll get back to that..but now..I need to run to Uni. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
 
Meh, story is passé. I just don't understand why people take the online world so ...serious.
That's something I have trouble understanding.
Simply because it's on line somehow makes it less valid? Less worthy of "seriousness"?
Don't get me wrong, fun is fun, and you can usually fit it in anywhere.
But if anything's worth your time it's worthy of taking seriously, no?
All of the science discussions aren't meant to be serious?
The to and fro about religion? Politics?
Meh on-line is merely a faster form of correspondence (with multiple correspondents).
Would you take letter-writing to be serious?
 
Besides, one_raven...do you mean to infer that for you it doesn't matter how your loved one breaks up with you? I mean it doesn't matter to you that she just sends you an sms to tell you to fuck off forever, or would you prefer it if she'd told it directly to your face?

No, you meant to infer that.
What I meant to imply was that if she curses me out in an email or in person, they carry an equal amount of disrespect.
 
sniffy:

I'd say it was more of a demand for answers. But never mind.

I can certainly be demanding! And James here's the thing... I think you can say whatever you like. However I'm sure you would agree that saying things sometimes has consequences that we might not anticipate..... that does not however mean that saying them is illigitimate.

'When sniffy opened her mouth/until sniffy opened her mouth' implies something to me.....

A case in point I live in the UK and recently there was a rather massive incident involving the government and expenses that lead to a number of disgruntled voters, journalists, observers and mischief makers to demand answers. Sometimes people who have something to hide don't like people who are demanding....

Let me make it quite clear here I am not suggesting that you James or Plazma has something to hide..... or indeed that this is an issue about voting....

And yes I do realise that this is a private website on the internet with terms and conditions that we can all read before we sign up and that if we don't like that we can all just go away......



You know what a patronising tone is, don't you sniffy?

Why yes James; yes I do..... see the scenario above about the UK government above and try to work out where 'patronising' fits in.


As it happens, I have also had professional involvement in employee recruitment, both paid and voluntary, so I think we can safely assume that we both know what we're talking about. Thanks for the primer, though.

Really? Perhaps you might like to think about the full implications of this.


In other words you saw the thread a week too late and it pissed you off. Is that it?

LOL! I knew you would try to pin that one on me! I refer you to the 'All in Moderation' thread where you will see a conversation going on. I am intelligent enough to know that if this were the case I could shoot off a PM to a couple of people. It would probably go something like this:

"Hey Plaz/Stryder/James/et al! See you are 'recruiting' at the moment. Missed the nomination thread but you know I'd love to be considered for moderator of free thoughts/art & culture. Hope it's not to late. By the way you don't usually do it this way......"

For the record I happen to believe that there are people here who are more deserving of the role. I don't think I'm up to the role and I lead a very busy life which means I may not be able to give the necessary time to such an important role. Also :eek: who'd be a moderator right? You can't seem to be able to do right for doing wrong........



This is all hypothetical. You're making an argument in the abstract on behalf of a hypothetical group of people who may have nominated themselves and been upset by the process. But the funny thing is that they are not complaining. It's just you.

Well yes it is hypothetical, isn't it? But then you might want to hypothesize about a time something has been done to you that others didn't think would upset you to realise something about this assumption....

Sniffy is so sensitive isn't she? Sniffy reads betweens the lines and makes connections. Sometimes sniffy reads the wrong things and makes the wrong connections. Sometimes she doesn't...

Oh, and Gustav is always up for joining in any complaint involving me, so he's with you of course.

I suggest you take that up with gustav not me. And for the record gustav has recently gone up in my estimation but not because he's had a go at you James. As I said sometimes sniffy makes the wrong connections. Sorry gustav......


I'm not sure what the point was with your script, but I hope it helped get it out of your system.

Read it again and try to unpick it James if you can be bothered. If you haven't got the time or the inclination then there's nothing I can say further other than it's not always about YOU James......but it is open to interpretation.....



I think I've encouraged you to open your mouth. In fact, I invited you to discuss the matter in this thread (or by PM).

All credit to you for that James......I took you up on the invitation didn't I?

You reffered to a 'public spectacle' ....words/spellings to that effect.......



I've truly sorry to hear that. You have my sympathy.


Empathy is probably a better word but I don't want to appear patronising for what might be a genuinely expressed sentiment. I do wish you'd posted my entire quote though.

The experience of losing someone to cancer was truly one of the worst I have ever experienced but I can't say it didn't teach me something about the value of life and the value of having one. When a person loses a life (depending upon your religious sentiments, of course) it is pretty difficult to get it back.

Pretty, pretty, pretty difficult. A bit like a reputation. If ever one had one.....

Of course the word 'reputation' has many different meanings. It helps to know the context though doesn't it?

---

Are we done yet?[/QUOTE]

I don't know James; are we? I don't think we are......yet.

Assumptions make arses out of us. I would even stick my neck out and say we are all guilty of making assumptions but instead I will say that most people make assumptions most of the time.

James and Plazma I'm sorry if I made an incorrect assumption about something or more that one thing. I can only go off the evidence presented as to what things are about.

Paranoia about something/s is a possible assumption which may or may not be correct.
 
That's not good manners!
1. The statement was intended as a humorous way of making a serious point. One Raven picked up on that. The post was mainly for One Raven's benefit. If I had been posting for you I would have avoided subtlety.
2. I never have kicked anyone in the nuts for being too stupid. The important point is that the option exists face to face.
 
Back
Top