Why on earth would I be prejudiced? Because you are young? Old? Male? Female? American? I have no idea of your demographic.

. You seem quite eager to sling ad hominems. You said I am incapable of understanding from a few words I used?

I don't care if you "mean well".

I expect you to act civilly and respectfully as I have afforded you.

I don't study how things work. I study what they mean. You should have noticed by now that missives are almost always accompanied by quotes from peer-reviewed publications. If I introduce something from a less reputable source it is because it introduces a new perspective on a lesser-known area that is nevertheless of interest.

I am interested in the very subjects that have given science fits for many years, not because I want to solve the equations, but to understand what it is that makes them seem in conflict, which IMO is impossible.

The universe has no conflicts. It started from a simple imbalance of a fundamental state and expanded in accordance with universal mathematical guidance. All potentially conflicting conditions throughout the universe have long since been naturally resolved, not by humans but by itself.

My main interest right now lies in microtubules and the growing field of knowledge in the role of MT in the emergence of consciousness an area of interest to Roger Penrose.

If there is any question about my methods of research and study, check out the 140+ pages of pertinent and tangently related articles by very reputable scientists.

My second interest is in the generic mathematics of the universe that deal not with human-symbolized numbers but with physical interactive values. 'The language of the Universe".

I particularly like the development of CDT (Causal Dynamical Triangulation) which proposes a fractal (mathematical) essence to spacetime that allowed for the emerging orderly patterns rooted in the fractal unfolding of spacetime.

Eventually you will find that certain common denominators tie seemingly disparate subjects together in a grander landscape. And that is where there is little information because it is at scales and dimensions previously outside our ability to observe or test. CERN was a tremendous human accomplishment and allowed Higgs to "tease" the

elusive Higgs boson from the bosonic field.

I don't use my info, I use scientific info. Even if my conclusion seem wrong , you cannot fault the science.

And as far as my usage of scientific terminology, yes I make up "strings" to condense what might otherwise take half a page and I am just making a general observation in a "conversational" manner.

It is true, I lack knowledge of scientific jargon. But I always use a valid dictionary definition and is easy to test "common denominators" between the two.

The results as I see them speak of a symbiotic relationship in a mathematical sense.

Why is the proper biological term to refer to a human as a biome?

IMO, the mathematics of this universe must be compatible at all levels or we could not wonder at the majesty of a quasi-intelligent "guiding force" without having to resort to an imaginary "motivated" sky-daddy.

This is why mathematics are the proof of