Why does the government hide UFO's?

They're only compelling to you because you demonstrate zero capacity for critical thinking.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And as usual you have nothing to refute the evidence with which is why you hurl childish insults. So what else is new?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Pad, was the thing you saw a perfect circle?
If so, then if it was a typical saucer-shaped craft, why would it be flying at an orientation that just happened to always be such that you saw a perfect disc? In no photo ive ever seen of UFOs is the craft perfectly circular in profile. You would need to be looking straight up at it or down on it.
Although a spherical craft would always appear circular in the sky.

There is one thing, though, that is circular and moon-sized in the sky...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Is it possible that it was a mirage of the actual moon, just as there have been mirage of cityscapes seen in the sky (which led some to believe NASA was building a floating city!)?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You haven't given ANY evidence to suggest that Paddoboy's UFO is a craft piloted by "nonhuman" intelligences that somehow aren't aliens.

Again, why do you think Paddoboy's UFO is one of the [nonhuman intelligence piloted craft] and not one of the non-[nonhuman intelligence piloted craft] with a mundane explanation?

 

Buzz off troll.

 

Ah yes! The old blue traveling-along-the horizon moon mirage! I see that all the time. lol!

 

Either all bright blue disks are otherworldly craft, or they're not.

If they are, then you should give evidence that all bright blue disks are otherworldly craft.

If they're not, you should give evidence that Paddoboy's UFO was an otherworldly craft and not a mundane phenomenon.

 

Yep, it was a perfect circle and appeared right on the horizon....Yep certainly it may have been a mirage, but don't tell MR that!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Could have been some one playing with a balloon also, who knows.
To say though that what I saw was Alien, or some interdimensional being is a Daecon has said a total lack of critical thinking on MR's part.

 

http://www.ufocasebook.com/2013/blueufocompare.html

 

Links to woo sites do not really count on a science forum.
Do better.

 

Links to ufo sites count in the ufo forum. Deal with it.

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I have dealt with it, and like your own rather biased views, have totally dismissed it as has the forum in general.

 

You speak only for yourself. I've done MY job and presented the evidence. It's up to everyone else to decide for themselves and research it further should they choose to. There is no hiding behind a mob mentality here. It is what it is.

 

Either all bright blue disks are otherworldly craft, or they're not.

If they are, then you should give evidence that all bright blue disks are otherworldly craft.

If they're not, you should give evidence that Paddoboy's UFO was an otherworldly craft and not a mundane phenomenon.

 

Yes, I speak for myself certainly, and you also most certainly have done your job in presenting a load of evidence, some nonsensically false, some questionable, some intriguing, some Interesting, but none extraordinary enough to show that any of your presentations are either Alien in origin or extra dimensional as you seem so anxious to convey.

 

i agree with MR-- if his post are in the correct sectors--then why is everyone still harassing him-- why can he not have his say under the sector that is designed for his say?-- i see this a lot here-- people whine that topics are not in the right sectors and this is the reason for the harassing--but when moved to the proper sectors--people still continue to harass--- i do not get it. MY GOD-- this is simply the fringe sector.

 

I once saw an unknown craft flying beneath me. It flew about 1000 feet beneath me and had blue and red navigation lights (normal in the US is green and red with white in back.) It was definitely a UFO but I suspect it was just an airplane.

 

An interesting thing about the Belgium case: If you watch the cockpit RADAR recording from the jet in pursuit [released by the BAF], the target actually goes below ground level for a moment. And the pilot never made visual contact. I have often suspected that this was a false image being projected from a stealth blimp nearby. The blimp accounts for the observations by eye witnesses on the ground. In other words, I wonder if this could have been a military test of new technology that combines stealth along with false image transmission. From what I understand this technology is now known to exist, which supports my long-held suspicions about this case.

So who is Russ accusing me of being this year?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I see that after what, 13 years, nothing has changed! LOL!!!

 

The Abduction Phenomenon:

 

Nope..a stealth blimp can't elude pursuing jets or suddenly accelerate to thousands of mph. The thousands of accounts also confirm several triangular craft. Not a blimp. Also note visuals of the movement of the craft during the jet pursuit were confirmed by witnesses:

"During this time, ground witnesses broadly corroborate the information obtained by radar. They described seeing the smaller triangle completely disappear from sight at one point, while the larger triangle moved upwards very rapidly as the F-16s flew past. After 00:30, radar contact became much more sporadic and the final confirmed lock took place at 00:40. This final lock was once again broken by an acceleration from around 160 km/h to 1,120 km/h, after which the radar of the F-16s and those at Glons and Semmerzake all lost contact. Following several further unconfirmed contacts, the F-16s eventually returned to base shortly after 01:00."==https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_UFO_wave