Vaccine related autism study?

You don't know if someone else couldn't get vaccinated because they were allergic, or just poor, or homeless, or perhaps were one of the 3% vaccines don't work for. Or maybe they got the illness straight from a natural source, like unclean water or bad food. So there's no justification for your hateful witchhunt of anti-vaxxers. None whatsoever. It's just a way of demonizing a small minority as diseased and immoral. Just like they did with AIDS. Just like they did with illegal immigrants and leprosy. Same old crap over and over again. Give them a name, and then connect a disease to them. After that, show how they are "endangering our children". It's genocidal thinking 101.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Does anyone have figures on the percentage of non vaccinated vs. vaccinated children by year in the us?

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Thanks. That is the all important data.
The increased incidence of autism cannot have been attributable to mercury.

The complete removal of avoidable mercury is probably wise.
When you are down to 1 microgramme as the safe maximum dose, I think you can take it as said that zero microgrammes is the ideal dose.

Now they have moved onto Aluminium.
I have learned, through reading this thread, how harmful aluminium can be to someone suffering renal failure or to premature babies , but I can't accept that it is causing autism in healthy babies.

It is of course possible that there is another environmental reason for the huge variations, up and down, of autism diagnosis. Not just the method of diagnosis and not ingredients in vaccines, but something else.

 

We have excellent proof that people who refuse to vaccinate themselves or their children destroy the protection of "herd immunity" and thus cause the problem you describe. In fact, we have over a century of data that proves that.

 

Correct. Which is why everyone who can get vaccinated should get vaccinated - because then that 3% is protected.

Saying "I really don't give a shit, let them die" is pretty indefensible. 3% of America is about 9 million people. (And to use your favorite tactics, Hitler only killed 6 million; you sure you want to use him AND Wakefield as your role models?)

 

Well, no. Back when vaccines first came out there were a bunch of deaths from contaminated vaccines - which is why they started requiring preservatives. Preservatives are necessarily toxins; they prevent growth of undesirable pathogens in the vaccine. So the ideal dose is the dose that prevents pathogen growth while minimizing toxicity in the resulting vaccine.

 

"Only 0.7 percent of children aged 19 to 35 months received absolutely no vaccinations in 2013, according to the National Immunization Survey. But that number masks some of the lower levels of uptake for some vaccines; about 92 percent of children that age, for example, received a dose of the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine.

Some parents forgo vaccines for economic reasons. Maybe they can't afford to make the trip to the doctor, or they don't have insurance that would pay for vaccines. That helps explain why, generally, vaccination rates are slightly lower for children living in poverty compared to those who aren't.

And a really small segment of the population skips vaccines for medical reasons — if, for example, a child has a compromised immune system that couldn't handle vaccines.

Then others opt out of childhood vaccine requirements for school children for religious or philosophical reasons. This map, made by Mother Jones with CDC data, estimates non-medical exemption rates across the US:

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

(Mother Jones)

Now, this map doesn't capture the variation within states. Some communities might have much lower vaccination rates than the rest of the state. It's these types of clusters that most worry public health officials, since disease outbreaks can take off there and eventually begin trickling out to other parts of the country. (This is what happened during the 2014 measles outbreak in an Ohio Amish community.)

 

No..Why don't you read the whole thread instead of jumping into the middle of it and ranting ignorantly. I did not make this data up. There are tons of studies supporting the link between vaccines and autism. Refer to the OP for instance. If the issue is so settled why are there these studies out there? Why the rabid attempt to deny this evidence and attack anti-vaxxers as stupid and uninformed. Now I know there is another considerable body of data showing no link between autism and vaccines. But that's just more studies. Studies over here saying there IS a link and studies over there showing there ISN'T a link. So what's the deal? Why the disparity in results? IMO that means the science isn't in yet on this issue. And if I were a parent I would seriously consider this fact before vaccinating my baby. Who can we trust? These parents aren't selfish or immoral. They are simply trying to do what's best for their child. Even if the anti-vax info is bogus, can't you see that it is presented in a convincing enough way to sway innocent parents? This demonizing of people is getting out of hand. Check this out:

http://time.com/3703769/vaccine-refusal-measels-addresses/

 

It's no one's job to go around the internet and delete discredited studies.

 

Just HOW deadly is measles?

"The CDC dataset that Orenstein, Perry and Halsey used specifically refers to reported cases of measles. The derived mortality rate is for cases that are serious enough to have been flagged and logged by the agency. The question then becomes, how many cases occurred that weren’t reported, and how (if at all) do these alter the estimated mortality rate?

In a 2004 review entitled “Measles Eradication in the United States” (an optimistic title, in the light of current events), Orenstein, Papania and Warton make the point that not every case of measles in the US is reported, or at least it wasn’t, when the disease was more common.

According to their paper, from 1956 to 1960, there were an average of 450 measles-related deaths reported each year in the US, or approximately 1 death per 1000 reported cases. At the time though, it was estimated that more than 90% of Americans had been infected by measles by the age of 15 – equivalent to roughly 4 million children and teens per year. (Langmuir, A.D. (1962), Medical Importance of Measles. Am J Dis Child 103(3):224-226.)

These data suggest that the chances of dying from measles in the US in the late 1950’s was probably closer to 1 in 10,000.

Accounting for non-reported cases that led to death, and some uncertainty in the numbers, the mortality rate is realistically likely to be around one in a few thousand. But based on the data, it’s not likely to be as high the one or two deaths per 1,000 that’s being widely cited."

Did you know the chances of your child dying of a congenital disease are greater that dying of measles? That the risk of dying from injury or violence or suicide is far greater than dying from measles? It's NOT the killer the hysterical vaccinators are making it out to be.

 

Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data.

RESULTS: When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age. Relative risks for males in general and African American males were 1.69 (p=0.0138) and 3.36 (p=0.0019), respectively. Additionally, African American males showed an odds ratio of 1.73 (p=0.0200) for autism cases in children receiving their first MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age versus 24 months of age and thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides new epidemiologic evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autismdiagnosis.

The CDC continues to insist that a link between vaccines and autism doesn’t exist, but…last month, they quietly launched a robo-call AND Twitter campaign to ask people for their input on the health impacts of vaccines."====http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/02/05/bombshell-cdc-whistleblower-admitted-covering-mmr-vaccine-links-autism-granted-immunity-will-testify/

 

A lot of self diagnosis is also occuring.
Suddenly people have realised that they are not rude and annoying, but have Aspergers syndrome.
They are misunderstood geniuses.

 

Did you know vaccinated people can spread the virus too for a period of time? Considering the vast numbers of vaccinated, who's really spreading the measles around?

"Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

Furthermore, vaccine recipients can carry diseases in the back of their throat and infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease.11,12,13

"Numerous scientific studies indicate that children who receive a live virus vaccination can shed the disease and infect others for weeks or even months afterwards. Thus, parents who vaccinate their children can indeed put others at risk," explains Leslie Manookian, documentary filmmaker and activist. Manookian's award winning documentary, The Greater Good, aims to open a dialog about vaccine safety.

Both unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals are at risk from exposure to those recently vaccinated. Vaccine failure is widespread; vaccine-induced immunity is not permanent and recent outbreaks of diseases such as whooping cough, mumps and measles have occurred in fully vaccinated populations.14,15 Flu vaccine recipients become more susceptible to future infection after repeated vaccination.16, 17

"Health officials should require a two-week quarantine of all children and adults who receive vaccinations," says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. "This is the minimum amount of time required to prevent transmission of infectious diseases to the rest of the population, including individuals who have been previously vaccinated."

"Vaccine failure and failure to acknowledge that live virus vaccines can spread disease have resulted in an increase in outbreaks of infectious disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals," says Manookian, "CDC should instruct physicians who administer vaccinations to inform their patients about the risks posed to others by those who've been recently vaccinated."

According to the Weston A. Price Foundation, the best protection against infectious disease is a healthy immune system, supported by adequate vitamin A and vitamin C. Well-nourished children easily recover from infectious disease and rarely suffer complications.

The number of measles deaths declined from 7575 in 1920 (10,000 per year in many years in the 1910s) to an average of 432 each year from 1958-1962.18 The vaccine was introduced in 1963. Between 2005 and 2014, there have been no deaths from measles in the U.S. and 108 deaths from the MMR vaccine."

- See more at: http://globenewswire.com/news-relea...uals-Spread-Disease.html#sthash.rYc2vVFL.dpuf