The Post Whatever Thread
- Thread starter serenesam
- Start date
Proof that women are better drivers (in Canada anyway).
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/change-gender-identification-insurance-alberta-1.4754416
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/change-gender-identification-insurance-alberta-1.4754416
speak i'm listening baby i'm your sweet thing believe what i'm saying god's truth i'm not lying lie, lie steady rest your head on me i'll smooth it nicely rub it better 'til it bleeds and, and you'll believe mecaught out again i'm calling you weak getting it up and i was joking sweet babe let me stroke it take i'm giving god's truth i'm not lying and and you'll believe me i'm calling you weak and i'll, i'll, i'll make it better and rub 'till it bleeds i'll rub it until it
punk ain't no religious cult punk means thinking for yourself you ain't hardcore cos you spike your hair when a jock still lives inside your head nazi punks nazi punks nazi punks fuck off nazi punks nazi punks nazi punks fuck off if you've come to fight get outta here you ain't no better than the bouncers we ain't trying to be police when you ape the cops it ain't anarchy nazi punks nazi punks nazi punks fuck off ten guys jump one what a man you fight each other the police state wins stab your backs when you trash our halls trash a bank if you've got real balls you still think swastikas look cool the real nazis run your schools they're coaches businessmen and cops in a real fourth reich you'll be the first to go nazi punks nazi punks nazi punks fuck off you'll be the first to go you'll be the first to go you'll be the first to go unless you think
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
USA socially projected culture is very biggoted.
jocks nerds preps beatnics etc etc... paradigms of patriarchal Dogma subjegating women as a slave class to the sexual Egos of men.
all the high school movies define clear cultural boundarys of forced compliance for teenagers going through self identity and puberty.
it is easier to see in the USA where liberalism allows free speach(adding this for the idiots and brain washed who are reading).
[note to the readers]Western 1st world culture affords the expresionism to define subjective labels of complaince.
it doesnt mean you must obey the narative of the worst common denominator while flaunting your weaknesses and phobias and baggage
queue men in suits
what does that say about their personality and their freedom of expresion ?
From what I've seen, most women enjoy being women. They see no shame in it. It warms my heart to see couples holding hands, especially the older couples. Men and women compliment each other.
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
which women were you watching enjoy themselves being women ?
you think they should feel shame ?
men & women make up most of society.
generaly most of society is able to be complimented by the other most of society...
what warms some peoples hearts makes other peoples hearts run cold.
such is the variety of human existance.
my heart is warmed by true love & souls that know & give love to others with no bias.
im biased like that
I've been spending a lot of time in the city lately, mostly watching people being, well, people.
Of course not. How about you?
Not certain what your aiming at, but okay.
Such as a man and a woman who spend a lifetime together?
RainbowSingularity
Valued Senior Member
you injected "shame" into your reply to me asserting there was some form of implied shame.
there clearly was not, thus i am asking why you assign shame to the situation as you must be thinking about something.
thus i ask
i am curious about your interpretation of where "shame" fits in the situation
i think people having long term OR short term relationships that mean a lot to them are good.
be they same sex or opposite sex or truples or what ever they are consenting adults consenting in.
"shame" implies subjective bias for imposed moral judgement.
what are you applying moraljudgement to, to assert "shame" in regard to ?
im quite aware your dancing around something but you seem to want to imply something rather than state it.
you dont have to. but your making a point using such a moral judgement term.
being happy for others who are happy is what i am refering to.
This is not a very common personal atribute so some may not be familair with it.
envy, greed, biggotry etc etc
devoid ofthese things to be able to be happy that someone else has found happiness.
man/woman no difference to a couple.
though im not hung up on defining people as being inadequate because they are single.
if someone is happy being single then i am happy for them also.
the "life time" thing is a little aired in implied dogma as no one spends their entire life time together, THUS there is implied subjective terms of reference which are culturalised or bias toward concepts of what "life time" mean.
i have met only a very small handful of gay men gay women and hetro couples who have been together for 30 years plus and are happy together being together.
30 years is not a life time, and i do not see that subjectively undermining, by implied terms, someone should not be happy to be with someone for less than 30 years.
Mod Hat — Double check
So, just to check on this point, this thread really is about something more than using the pretense of "post whatever" as a "free thought" to shepherd political advocacy?
I ask because i've seen a similar routine before, that random notes under a pretense of free thought should include promotion of political propaganda.
So, just to check on this point, this thread really is about something more than using the pretense of "post whatever" as a "free thought" to shepherd political advocacy?
I ask because i've seen a similar routine before, that random notes under a pretense of free thought should include promotion of political propaganda.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
True, but it makes for a tougher cut of meat.
--Dave