The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

[George E Hammond]

Bet you are wrong.

You can hope all you want.
You were asked to supply the proof you say you have, so what's the holdup. Oh yeah, you ain't got no proof.

[George E Hammond MS physics]
...No Mr. Jumpinalake, the problem is that the person demanding the "proof" is a moderator holding my thread "hostage" in a "pseudoscience" category, out of political spite and personal envy ! When obviously every indication is that it is bona fide legitimate science some of it substantially peer-reviewed and published in a prestigious academic journal.
... So, if he wants me to bend over backwards and give him a command performance tutorial on the scientific certainty (1:3 odds) of life after death that I have discovered, he will first have to at least grant me the dignity of transferring this thread to – Philosophy/Subform Religion where it rightly belongs !
... And until then, there will be no "command performance" tutorial, even for the boss !!

George

 

[George E Hammond]

Shocks!
A god needs your help James.
Do what George says JamesR, the WORLD depends on you making known this ''discovery''.
Can you shoulder the responsibility James?
Ps, there are powers working here greater than you can ever know.

[George E Hammond MS physics ('67)]
Boy! – "Out of the mouths of babes comes the truth"

GH

 

[origin]

...No Mr. Jumpinalake, the problem is that the person demanding the "proof" is a moderator holding my thread "hostage" in a "pseudoscience" category, out of political spite and personal envy ! When obviously every indication is that it is bona fide legitimate science some of it substantially peer-reviewed and published in a prestigious academic journal.

Sounds like you have no proof so you are trying to changing the subject.
Here is a thought; if you gave some proof the thread would be moved out of pseudoscience! But you don't have any proof, since the whole notion is silly nonsense, so it will stay in pseudoscience or better yet the cesspool.

... So, if he wants me to bend over backwards and give him a command performance tutorial on the scientific certainty (1:3 odds) of life after death that I have discovered, he will first have to at least grant me the dignity of transferring this thread to – Philosophy/Subform Religion where it rightly belongs !

This is a discussion forum so I hardly think you are bending over backwards by discussing your [absurd] idea.
Quit ranting/whining and supply this alleged proof.

 

[George E Hammond]

Sounds like you have no proof so you are trying to changing the subject.
Here is a thought; if you gave some proof the thread would be moved out of pseudoscience! But you don't have any proof, since the whole notion is silly nonsense, so it will stay in pseudoscience or better yet the cesspool.

This is a discussion forum so I hardly think you are bending over backwards by discussing your [absurd] idea.
Quit ranting/whining and supply this alleged proof.

[George E Hammond MS physics]
No, I think the problem is that you're another taunting nonscientist with no scientific credentials.
MIND POSTING YOUR CV ?
MINE IS POSTED HERE:
https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae
GH

 

[origin]

No, I think the problem is that you're another taunting nonscientist with no scientific credentials.

I see... you have no proof or actual evidence, got it.

 

[James R]

George E Hammond said in post #244:
"However in 2010 A.D. Hammond discovered and proved to a better than 1 in 3 certainty purely scientifically that the actual total flesh and blood human body is instantly resurrected to "eternal life" at the precise moment of human death."

[George E Hammond MS physics]
Okay James R, how about cutting a deal with me? If you will transfer this thread to: forumHILOSOPHY – subforum:RELIGION, I will agree to post a full and complete "proof" of my above statement there !

I like origin's idea better. How about you post your proof? If it is valid, then I'll happily move this thread to the Physics forum, or to Philosophy or whatever.

How long is the proof? Have you published it anywhere? Can I read it on the web somewhere?

... This thread is obviously "NOT pseudoscience"...

So far, it has all the hallmarks. Overblown claims. Self aggrandisement. Lack of sufficient clarity to allow verification of central claims. And so on and so forth. Basically, an unpublishable mess, except perhaps in the vanity press. How much did Exselsior or whoever it was charge you to publish your 733 word treatise? Did anybody peer review it (properly) before publication, or was it just "you pay us a fee and we'll publish whatever you want"?

And should (and I indeed fully expect) that when this theory finally hits the streets your decision to transfer it to "pseudoscience" will prove to be a severe embarrassment to Sciforums.

Oh dear. When will it finally hit the streets?

... I am 80 years old and even more interested therefore in the possibility of life after death that you are.

Unfortunately, wishing doesn't make it so.

 

[Michael 345]

if you gave some proof

Will James call his bluff?

Will

SPOG

be revealed?

Will any other proof be revealed?

Will the world be saved?

 

[exchemist]

[George E Hammond MS physics]
...No Mr. Jumpinalake, the problem is that the person demanding the "proof" is a moderator holding my thread "hostage" in a "pseudoscience" category, out of political spite and personal envy ! When obviously every indication is that it is bona fide legitimate science some of it substantially peer-reviewed and published in a prestigious academic journal.
... So, if he wants me to bend over backwards and give him a command performance tutorial on the scientific certainty (1:3 odds) of life after death that I have discovered, he will first have to at least grant me the dignity of transferring this thread to – Philosophy/Subform Religion where it rightly belongs !
... And until then, there will be no "command performance" tutorial, even for the boss !!

George

Your error here is to think anyone cares. We're not bothered that you are languishing in Pseudo. The person demanding to be upgraded to science or philosophy is you, not us. So either post the proof you claim to have, or accept that Pseudo is where you will stay - if you're lucky.

But as you are 80, my guess is mild dementia of some kind is distorting your judgement. This happens to plenty of people: Linus Pauling, Tesla, even Schrödinger. I suggest you just relax and gently enjoy what years remain. This Quixotic tilting at windmills will just wear you out and make you embittered.

I'm 67 myself and very conscious of the risk of going down this route in due course. However I have the example of my father who, at 94, wheelchair-bound and barely able to speak after two strokes, retains his good humour and enjoys a few simple pleasures in his nursing home.

 

[Michael 345]

retains his good humour and enjoys a few simple pleasures in his nursing home

Looking after such patients remained difficult but a lot less than those of a [George E Hammond MS physics] disposition

At 80 myself and out of nursing about 20 years I can still hear the thoughts of nursing staff at change of shift patient hand over hoping not to have him assigned in their work load

Going to try to avoid a nursing home and bring the girlfriend who, moved into my Bali hotel room for 14 months as my sponsor when I became stranded there

Shepherd me to the Indonesian Embassy to renew visa every month and put in a mountain of paperwork to get me vaccinated

 

[George E Hammond]

I see... you have no proof or actual evidence, got it.

[George E Hammond MS physics]
...Yeah, I see too; you have no CV in science. Fact is the scientific explanation of life after death (LAD) is given sufficiently for any scientist with advanced degrees – in the next to last paragraph of post #1 of this thread. And if that is not sufficient, a detailed, fully illustrated, explanation is given here:

https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_simple_airbag_theory_of_Life_After_Death

...This discussion is now being populated by neo-atheistic cranks with no qualifications in science.
I will not respond any further to anyone unless they possess advanced academic scientific credentials.

George

 

[Beer w/Straw]

Coward!

 

[Michael 345]

I will not respond any further to anyone unless they possess advanced academic scientific credentials.

Anyone here qualify?

That many?

And with that statement "I will not respond any further" a hush fell over the thread

Shussss, George is mulling and looking at his wounded foot

 

[George E Hammond]

Coward!

"Discretion is the better part of valor"
George

 

[Beer w/Straw]

"Discretion is the better part of valor"
George

You're quoting yourself?

 

[George E Hammond]

You're quoting yourself?

[George E Hammond MS physics]
No, I was quoting Falstaff who said:
"Discretion is the better part of valor"
George

 

[Dywyddyr]

[George E Hammond MS physics]
No, I was quoting Falstaff who said:
"Discretion is the better part of valor"
George

Wrong, you're paraphrasing him.
But then again, you have previously shown a propensity for sloppiness and imprecision.

 

[foghorn]

By refusing to post proof here, George has decided and shown his ego is more important than saving the world.
Hang your head in shame George in not having faith in your own ''discovery''.
Now we know what the 'E' stands for in George's middle name, EGO.
George Ego Hammond.

 

[origin]

I will not respond any further to anyone unless they possess advanced academic scientific credentials.

Promises, promises, we all know you won't really stop your silly soapboxing. We can hope but we know you won't shut up.

 

[foghorn]

By coincidence this box is the same dimensions as the Ark of the Covenant.
Make of that what you will George.

 

[George E Hammond]

Wrong, you're paraphrasing him.
But then again, you have previously shown a propensity for sloppiness and imprecision.

[George E Hammond MS physics]
... Post your CV and give us a reason to think you know what you're talking about!
... Meanwhile, the entire world "paraphrases" Shakespeare's 16th century English. And "discretion is the better part of valor" is the worldwide decision on that paraphrase.
... Go do your quick lookup on wiki.
GH