He's really not. He is this way on other forums as well.
Ever wonder how Trump won? People like Wellwisher. "Grab women by the crotch when you can get away with it?" Wellwisher will come up with a reason why that's not that bad. Increase funding for science and math education? Wellwisher will have a reason why only gay welfare bums could support anything like that.
Trump won because he had the best ideas, drive and talent to make it all work. Trump was not biased or incapacitated by PC. He was able to take it on and therefore he was able to exceed its dysfunction. Lack of dysfunction, appears abnormal to the left.
Proof of this occurred in the theater district off Broadway. There is a new play, that is based on the transcripts of the Presidential debates between Hillary and Trump. The twist of the play is Trump is played by a woman, and Hillary is played by a man. The original liberal intent of this play was to demonstrate how if Hillary had been a man, she would have won. This is the leftist narrative or a male conspiracy.
It turned out the opposite happened, based on the responses of the mostly liberal audience. The woman playing Trump was the more reasonable and likable character, based her using Trump's ideas and opinions. The man playing Hillary was not as likable, but was felt to be too wishy washy.
When I post a countering argument and opinions, to leftist sexism, I do this do help the one-sided leftist brain look at both sides. It is usually taboo to present the other side, such that this is often censored, groups attacked and even grounds for suspension, less liberal mind be opened up and learning critical thinking skills. The left position is so fragile, that censor is needed to prevent falling over the edge.
Relative to the play, although the audience like the she-Trump character the best, based on Trump's style and words, the audience still hate the male version of Trump, even though they could relate to his words and intend, via a woman. The Trump bias, is based on very shallow sexist criteria. When the substance of Trump was isolated via a woman, it could stand on its own. This was not the expected result, but it was very informative. Swamps are composed of shallow water.
The violence and abuse of women has gone up as the impact of atheism and the left has increased in culture. The left employs a constant shake down scam under the guise of equal rights and justifiable rage. When religion was more dominant, women were protected and placed on a pedestal; 1950's, with even neighbors willing and able to step in to act as protectors. The left blames the right for the continued abuse, while being the matrix entitlement via the abuse of power.
You can't have violent leftist demonstrations to settle arguments, and then expect that to translate to mutual respect between two sides like men and women.The peaceful leaning right, demonstrations, show how you respect each other. Calmness allows one to control rage that can escalate to abuse of each other.
In America were have equal protection under the law. The concept of woman's rights means the left does not wish to have equal protection under law, rather one sex has extra laws just for itself. It is one thing for behavior to be a social fad, that has no backing by law. If you wish to buy a pet rock that is your choice. This does not violate equal protection under the law. It is another thing to alter the law, to add extra laws of some, to void the idea of equal protection under law. This behavior has noting to do with equal rights, which is a deliberate word game. This is based on entitlements. An entitlement is where you use and misuse law to give extras, to some groups, beyond equal legal protection by law for all. The slave owners were entitled beyond the slaves by laws the left created. It is about power grab.
If we accept the premise of woman's right, we will need to have the same number of men's rights. This is the only way to approximate equal protection under the law; same number of laws. I brought up nagging because few men enjoy this, in the confines of a relationship. If men wished to be wimps and/or control the women to heir own advantage, this could be part of men's rights. How would women feel about that; shoe on the other foot? Men are more self reliant, since they learn to deal with nagging, in private, without forcing behavior change with law. That would only lead to further problems due to resentment. Hillary and many leftist thought she was entitled to be president just because she was a woman. Equal protection means free and open competition with only one set of laws for all. That is what happened. Tje left thinks rigged system via stacked deck of law is their entitlement.
