Rub your clits here!

[invert_nexus]

Or am I confusing links with hits?

That one.

Links are like this:

Rub my big, wet clit, daddy.

 

[S.A.M.]

Is there a way to find out who is linking to a page?

Sort of a ages that link here

 

[invert_nexus]

Not that I'm aware of.
Would be interesting though.

This algorithm, by the way, is manipulated by way of "googlebombing" into such hysterical number one hits as: "Miserable Failure" leading to George Bush's page (alternating with Jimmy Carter and Michael Moore once Bush's cronies learned about it and retaliated), "Weapons of Mass Destruction" leading to a funny page saying they couldn't be found, "More evil than Satan" to a page on Bill Gates, etc...

I'm saddened to learn that Google has altered its algorithm in such a way as to prevent googlebombing from working anymore. I suspect that it didn't so much alter its algorithm as work on a case by case basis.

 

[S.A.M.]

I'm saddened to learn that Google has altered its algorithm in such a way as to prevent googlebombing from working anymore. I suspect that it didn't so much alter its algorithm as work on a case by case basis.

I'm sure someone will find a way around that as well.

 

[S.A.M.]

Thanks for the heads up....time to change my avatar

Is that Druuna in your avatar? :m:

 

[visceral_instinct]

*masturbates violently*

 

[Enmos]

Enmos,

No. I call that giving up on all hopes of communication after previous attempts were shunned.

I knew that already.

Ok.

..relax a little.

Ok.

 

[Enmos]

"jump!" said gendaken. And they jumped.

:worship:

So it was intentional.. right ?

 

[Enmos]

Truly one of the great mysteries of life.
I have this theory that it generated spontaneously from dung.
You know, like flies.

Huh.. what about the maggots ?

 

[S.A.M.]

So it was intentional.. right ?

 

[Enmos]

What's your point ?

 

[John99]

Is there a way to find out who is linking to a page?

Sort of a ages that link here

Part of the answer was given here:

500 plus bots at a time indexing us.

Mostly it is the uniqueness of you search phrase combined with how recent it is.

 

[draqon]

 

[S.A.M.]

 

[Enmos]

Uhm.. lol
I can see a symbolism here but I don't think you intended it that way, at least not the way I see it.

 

[redarmy11]

Is there a way to find out who is linking to a page?

Sort of a ages that link here

http://www.google.co.uk/search?as_lq=http://www.sciforums.com

1,120 links. Shurely shome mishtake? Mind you, not many would probably wanna link to the front page..

http://www.google.co.uk/search?as_lq=http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=79647

"Your search - link:http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=79647 - did not match any documents"

And no-one's interested in all our clit-rubbing. Maybe we should rub harder.

 

[kenworth]

Not that I'm aware of.
Would be interesting though.

This algorithm, by the way, is manipulated by way of "googlebombing" into such hysterical number one hits as: "Miserable Failure" leading to George Bush's page (alternating with Jimmy Carter and Michael Moore once Bush's cronies learned about it and retaliated), "Weapons of Mass Destruction" leading to a funny page saying they couldn't be found, "More evil than Satan" to a page on Bill Gates, etc...

I'm saddened to learn that Google has altered its algorithm in such a way as to prevent googlebombing from working anymore. I suspect that it didn't so much alter its algorithm as work on a case by case basis.

type "find chuck norris" into google

 

[kenworth]

oh and click the im feeling lucky button

 

[redarmy11]

Heh. Nice. Any more?

 

[kenworth]

nah.,someone just told me about that the other day.
i have no tricks