Rub your clits here!

You know, some people think that I bring down the intellectualness of this forum.

I'm not the perv posting threads about masterbating.

I'm not sure who created this thread, and i'm not sure why you guys continue to keep it alive, but it's HORRIBLE to come on the forums and see that thread name. You guys dumb down sciforums.


Oh thank YOU for those very intellectual words of wisdom!:rolleyes:
 
You know, some people think that I bring down the intellectualness of this forum.

I'm not the perv posting threads about masterbating.

I'm not sure who created this thread, and i'm not sure why you guys continue to keep it alive, but it's HORRIBLE to come on the forums and see that thread name. You guys dumb down sciforums.

Yes. It's absolutely terrible isn't it B? They should all be decapitated.
 
You know, some people think that I bring down the intellectualness of this forum.

I'm not the perv posting threads about masterbating.

I'm not sure who created this thread, and i'm not sure why you guys continue to keep it alive, but it's HORRIBLE to come on the forums and see that thread name. You guys dumb down sciforums.

Two trips: Stay away; learn to spell.
 
You know, some people think that I bring down the intellectualness of this forum.

I'm not the perv posting threads about masterbating.

I'm not sure who created this thread, and i'm not sure why you guys continue to keep it alive, but it's HORRIBLE to come on the forums and see that thread name. You guys dumb down sciforums.

You know exactly who created this thread,me. It was done in a somewhat misguided attempt to provoke change, I saw the error in my methods and apologized, you still have yet to make any contribution to these forums that doesn't turn into a me me me thread. ;)
 
I think its incredibly ironic that an issue which should have disappeared with gendy's thread will be broadcast to the pervs of the world with this one, which is protesting that thread!
 
Serious question, does sciforums pay to appear on the first page of google? (I've found it a there a number of times)
 
Serious question, does sciforums pay to appear on the first page of google? (I've found it a there a number of times)

I have no idea what determines a first page appearance, I was under the impression that google spiders only sweep sites every so often, but our threads seem to consistently hit the first pages.:shrug:
 
Google's algorithms depend upon how many links to a page exist.
I think that this means that self-referential links such as in a forum would also tally up towards the total.

Sciforums database is huge and that's part of what gives it the value that Zox and co. saw in it when they actually threw down cold hard cash to buy it.

Combine this with the fact that we seem to place no limits on how many bots can index the site at a time and we get pretty high in the page rankings.

Of course, we were always pretty high even before we had 500 plus bots at a time indexing us. I suspect that there are lots of links out there on the web pointing back here to add to the self-referential links within the forum itself.
 
So the more people access a particular page, the greater the links to it? Or am I confusing links with hits?
 
Back
Top