All I've done is point out the alarmists narrative since day one of global warming. It's evolving in their minds.
Something that drifted through my twitfeed a few days ago:
Science is not the truth. Science is finding the truth. When science changes its opinion, it didn't lie to you. It learned more.
(Mohamad Safa↱)
One of the disgusting things about your behavior is that in your rage you overlook what is already commonly recognized. That is, it's bad enough if, like the topic post and thread, you're overlooking the literally observable result of increasing variation from mean temperature—meaning more pronounced hot
and cold weather—with a warming trend. Per the thread title, the record cold and snow in Brazil might feel like a surprise in day to day life, but, as
Exchemist↱ noted at the outset, "It seems to be what we have been told to expect, viz. increased frequency of extreme weather events."
But in addition to depicting yourself as decades behind the science, that rage comes across like an angry child trying to learn how to say mean things.
And while it is not uncommon that one's political needs might move them to inflamed passions, no, not all such occasions are the same.
So, here's a quick story reminding how science works: Once upon a time, creationists held to a point about the whale-bear because they thought it was hilarious, and took satisfaction from smacking Darwinism about the whale-bear. And, let's face it, they had hooted about that one from the moment Darwin suggested it. But then the actual fossil record of the whale-bear turned up; its name is
Ambulocetus natans. And it's not quite that the next ting that happened was creationists collectively saying,
Fine, just show us the rest of the transitional fossils, too! but that demand is essentially what it came down to, over time, with creationist and designist hollering about transitional fossils common enough to even be found at Sciforums.
It's similar why our
thread-starter↑ is down to asking for n othing more than everything, for instance. The half a whit of civility he pretends isn't worth much compared to his distortive doubtmongering, but it's not an unfamiliar routine either in general or particular.
Still, consider that we are apparently supposed to pretend our around observing the destabilizing averages, when the hot gets hotter, the cold gets colder, and the average temperature in all that does in fact describe a warming trend.
The idea that society is how far into the discussion, and folks at Sciforums are somehow so uniquely behind is, well, in a word, it seems kind of retarded.