That is good River.
Holding respect is good.
Trying to understand is good.
Recognising nonsence is good.
Being good is good.
Alex
True
That is good River.
Holding respect is good.
Trying to understand is good.
Recognising nonsence is good.
Being good is good.
Alex
To preempt any reference to a soul or other supernatural idea be ready for proof of souls existence
NDE shows that there is an I , hence a soul .
You say there is a soul yet offer no evidence
their purpose is invalid for whatever reasons.
Yep. That was the point of subsequent posts clarifying that a personal purpose is the only one meaningfully discussible. If anyone wishes to argue the purpose of life in general, and wishes to invoke spiritualism, then they'll have to provide some objective evidence.A slight technicality (may be due to the looseness of the original post) which I took to be the purpose of life (in general) not purpose of my life (which some posters inserted later when they personalised the post by referring to their soul)
All I can do is try and understand what you mean.
Do you say the soul is "the life force"?
The thing that turns chemicals into life?
When you talk is it your soul talking?
What is the soul made of?
Alex
Let me tell you my old chemistry point was in order to have a reaction you have have to bring the chemicals to gather, a product of chemical reaction is heat, The heat will initiate other reaction together and so there is life, . So the pump was plugged in by some human and the human unplugged the pump. Oxygen ceases yo flow an there is no life.
Well done.Soul. The invisible hand of God initiate life ,
I don't entirely agree with that.This is one of those rare cases where opponents do not have to provide evidence of a mechanism (in this case, a soul) to invoke it.
Agreed.The thread subject is the purpose of life. That is a personal call on each person's part, as to what it means to them. There is no objectivity here.
I couldn't agree more!If, say, Tim and Riv believe that a soul is part of what they are, and that their purpose involves its care, that's their right.
This is not the place for one person to insist that their constructs are part of someone else's purpose, and certainly not the place where anyone gets to tell anyone else that their purpose is invalid for whatever reasons.
Not, as I see it, in an 'About the Members' thread, where they are asked essentially what they believe.This is first and foremost a science forum, with many sub-forums, any person who claims life after death and a soul, can be reasonably asked for evidence of such,
particularly when they are using it in an effort to deride or invalidate some scientific theory.
Agreed.Not, as I see it, in an 'About the Members' thread, where they are asked essentially what they believe.
The error with their statements starts when they don't stop there, as you correctly point out here:
That's just what an individual life form does. That's not the purpose of all life, which has no ultimate purpose. It arose because conditions favored it, that's all. If conditions didn't happen to favor it, the Earth would be like any other planet in our solar system.To me the growth of a living being , in the corporeal form , is the purpose of life .
You are the one suggesting it, you provide the evidence.Can anybody proof that we don't have a soul ?
I
particularly when they are using it in an effort to deride or invalidate some scientific theory.
When people attempt to denigrate science as the likes of timojin and others do, then I believe the gloves are off, and they need to be confronted with cold hard scientific fact
Each to there own.
I simply call it as resulting probably from a fluctuation in the quantum foam, spacetime, fundamental matter,planets, stars, galaxies, all with a use by date when we all shall be returned to the star dust from whence we arose.So Mr. what are you going to call this situation ? Call it soul call it dark energy or slap any name you want It is part of the energy of the universe.
This is a clash of beliefs no facts can win. Neither side can convince the other and believes what they see as reality is so, there is no need to consider that one or both maybe right or wrong, but to accept that beliefs are not often altered and so there can be no establishement in the mind of either side they could be wrong.So Mr. what are you going to call this situation
This is a clash of beliefs no facts can win. Neither side can convince the other and believes what they see as reality is so, there is no need to consider that one or both maybe right or wrong, but to accept that beliefs are not often altered and so there can be no establishement in the mind of either side they could be wrong.
I have accepted a situation much in line with the uncertainty principle.
I allow other peoples universe to exist so I can explore it. I let these other universes pop in and out and remain an observer.
Is my soul the observer?
Could the soul be a very intelligent germ, indestructible and immortal, and it leaves the body eventually finding another host, human or animal, where it sets up shop to gather more experience of life thereby living up to its purpose of gathering information to takeback eventually to the head germ.
There is a book right there probably a best seller unfortunately.
Great thread interesting other universes to be seen.
Alex
Heat as a best litmus test of life?Life is part of energy , while we are a life our temperature is higher then the ground when we die our temperature drops to ground temp. Therefore life have energy. When a person is put into a respirator energy is added to the body, you remove the respirator there is no life.
So Mr. what are you going to call this situation ? Call it soul call it dark energy or slap any name you want It is part of the energy of the universe.
I like it.Al. I finish my chapter. with . Thank God for science that made life easier life for mankind.
Heat as a best litmus test of life?
Is a forest fire life? Is a sunny patch of rock life?
Does a forest fire have a soul then? A sunny rock?
No, you are describing simple chemistry and chemical energy. That is not life. Certainly not a soul.
I have met folk who would probably say yes...Is a forest fire life? Is a sunny patch of rock life?
Does a forest fire have a soul then? A sunny rock?