This is a lot of writing .
Usually my posts are longer than I planned. In this case I was trying to develop some ideas that have occurred to me as I have read so many Creationist arguments against science.
I think you are a disciple of Dawkins .
Nope. I was concluding that religion is a lie at about the same time Dawkins published his first paper. I never heard of him until many years later. Besides, I resent the word "disciple" insofar as this remark appears to disparage Dawkins, a person who has contributed to the benefit of global knowledge. Someday your life may be saved by a procedure which indirectly arose from his work. So appreciate great minds like his.
so I would not be surprised you copied some of his lines . that is ok.
Not even close. I have no need to copy anyone, and if I did I would cite them in italics with a link to the source. I suppose I am not surprised by your statement, insofar as it admits to prejudice as in the above remark.
I dont' believe all chemical reaction are random collision ,
It is very hard to steer molecules together. The most phenomenal steering mechanism is the interaction that occurs during synthesis of polymers in the cell. But I was referring to the default state of molecular activity withing the cytoplasm. And yes, Virginia, there is random interaction in all chemical reactions, (here referring to "bulk" level reactions).
I agree there brownian motion play a roll, but ionic affinity concentration, polarisation in the system have an influence on product formation.
No doubt. And here we can touch on the significance of the cell membrane which introduces a means for ion separation, among other things.
This is a rather complex structure unto itself. So consider instead the most primitive cell membrane conceivable.
Perhaps in a Prokaryotic the random reaction may play a larger roll by I doubt in a Karyotic cells random reaction will function .
The idea is that in the genesis of eukaryotes, new structures evolved which "steer" reactions to some degree, but even in prokayotes, the cell membrane and ctyoskeletal components (microtubules and filaments) would affect ion concentration/diffusion, among other things. Again, I was considering the most primitive state conceivable, in which the only "cause" of reactions is Brownian motion. And the amount of energy in those collisions is a function of the amount of energy incident at the "primordial soup" from all available natural energy sources.
The energy present in the Earth which gave rise to these reactions (to the formation of compounds dissolved in water and the heat and chemical energy which added to the energy contributing to such reactions, was imparted to the Earth - indirectly - by the Big Bang. That is, this energy emerged from the remnants of super novae which formed the accretion disk from which the Earth emerged.
For that reason it's perfectly fine to call Brownian motion (and the rest of all biotic energy) the result of stochastic processes.