Israeli/Hamas disregard for human life.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who gives a shit pj? This is about Israel not about your hatred for the righteuous
I has framing my explantion in personal terms in hopes he would understand it. And what the fuck do mean by my hatred of the righteous? How about you remove your head from buffalo's colon and quit making baseless assumptions about me. Start looking at the facts and learning.
 
Your the last person to be calling anyone a parrot. All you do is regurgitate things your betters have thought and said.


I already gave it to you. You as usual didn't understand it.

No, your didn't give any thing that made any logical sense, just a bunch of the psychobabble that passes for Logic in your mind.

You can't explain your post, that is becoming patently obvious.
 
Who gives a shit pj? This is about Israel not about your hatred for the righteuous
I has framing my explantion in personal terms in hopes he would understand it. And what the fuck do mean by my hatred of the righteous? How about you remove your head from buffalo's colon and quit making baseless assumptions about me. Start looking at the facts and learning.
 
No, your didn't give any thing that made any logical sense, just a bunch of the psychobabble that passes for Logic in your mind.
You can't explain your post, that is becoming patently obvious.

just because you don't understand it doesn't mean I didn't explain it. But for your sake because I unlike you am a decent human being will explain it again.
Being descendent from the native population is have a genetic link to them. Being the native population is not only having the genetic link but having geographic and cultural links as well.


the only thing that is patently obvious here is you lack the intellectual ability to carry on a debate as an adult.
 
I think what pjdude is saying is pretty clear. Many native Americans are denied tribal status by the US because they cannot prove a link to their tribe, no one cares who their father or mother was. I doubt Buffalo has any Indian blood, he's just making it up.

Today, Native American tribes are divided into two categories: those recognized by the federal government, and those not formally "recognized" by the United States. Tribes that are federally recognized receive the benefits and services exclusively reserved by the federal government for those classified as Indians. As a result of historical circumstances, nonrecognized tribes are excluded from federal assistance because they have not maintained a formal relationship with the United States. Denied their status as "Indians," members of nonrecognized tribes have sought the assistance of the federal judiciary to compel the federal government to comply with its trust obligations to all Native Americans. Courts have struggled to decide "whether and to what extent old promises should be honored" to Indian tribes, (4) a question made more difficult when considered as to tribes not recognized by the federal government.

http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-6962662_ITM
 
just because you don't understand it doesn't mean I didn't explain it. But for your sake because I unlike you am a decent human being will explain it again.
Being descendent from the native population is have a genetic link to them. Being the native population is not only having the genetic link but having geographic and cultural links as well.


the only thing that is patently obvious here is you lack the intellectual ability to carry on a debate as an adult.

Yes pj, I trembles at the searing logic of your fiery intellect.
 
I think what pjdude is saying is pretty clear. Many native Americans are denied tribal status by the US because they cannot prove a link to their tribe, no one cares who their father or mother was. I doubt Buffalo has any Indian blood, he's just making it up.

thats not what I'm saying. My point is without a number of links to bring within a native group you cannot be considered part of the native population.
 
thats not what I'm saying. My point is without a number of links to bring within a native group you cannot be considered part of the native population.

I know, its like a Roman descendent claiming to be Dutch because his grandfather was in the Netherlands 2000 years ago.
 
I think what pjdude is saying is pretty clear. Many native Americans are denied tribal status by the US because they cannot prove a link to their tribe, no one cares who their father or mother was. I doubt Buffalo has any Indian blood, he's just making it up.



http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-6962662_ITM

Seems to me fairly obvious that these people, who were not Indians, came from south and central america. they look exactly the same as you can still to this day find there. it is a short canoe trip to north america and the tales that were told (by the new settlers) were surely exaggerated anyway. and many get their information from watching old western movies which of course are fiction.

this is not to say that there was no conflict but to be honest the natives who found the land and had as much right to it as new comers were not exactly accommodating. lets put the camp fire tales and folk lore to rest once and for all.
 
Actually if you read the link you can see they are denied status because they were not "nice" to the US government. Not that those who were nice are doing any better. I heard today that in Arizona the Americans are cutting off water sources of the natives.
 
And it would not surprise me one bit if a good number of S.p.A.M's own family lives in U.S.

I know that a large number of indians (from india and the region) do live in U.S. to that end they should be grateful that people made it safe and accommodating.

But now with the bad economy thing slowed down because there is no work for them.
 
Last edited:
It's not piracy if Israel doesn't take their stuff (it's going to be sent over land).
 
Yeah, notice how free Gaza is since the Israelis left?


It's as free as one could expect given the palestinian’s reaction to sharon's risky decision to leave gaza. The idea was to give the palestinians more freedom to choose their own course and at the same time free up israeli resources for something other than managing gaza.

The reaction of the palestinians was to elect a terrorist group to take the reigns of government whose very first act as the newly elected representives of the palestinian people was to officially declare war on israel by reiterating the foundation of their charter which is to destroy israel. Israel reacted to defend itself against this bone-headed move by taking over the boarder crossings to prevent weaponry entering gaza.

After declaring war, hamas hoped to effect a longterm ceasefire that would give it a chance to build it’s military machine, but the israelis of course declined to go along with this. Hamas reacted to this by preventing humanitarian supplies from reaching their own people in order to claim that israel is "starving palestinians" and denying them the resources needed for proper medical care.
 
Me? Seems like a mighty big claim. I don't summarily round up my political opposition and torture/execute them.

I was just pointing out that nobody in this conflict is without blood on their hands.

And, of course, I wonder how productive it is to quibble about who is at fault in all of this when innocent people are caught in the middle of this all.
 
Killing collaborators of the enemy is a given in any society. What does any government do with treason in times of war? The ZOB too executed the Judenrat. In an unequal war those who support the enemy are a greater liability when within the ranks. And they know it. It's why so many loyalists ran away to Canada.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top