How dreams theoretically AND actually unify gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism

[James R]

Frank:

*** BBBzzzzzttt! Your time is up!

Since you are unable to answer my questions about your great "theory", I dismiss you as just another crank. This is my last post to you, other than in my capacity as administrator/moderator.

Gravity and inertia are both fundamental to distance in/of space.

You have never explained how or why.

Stand up James R Moderator, and look directly downward at the ground. Full gravity is full distance in/of space.

Your conclusion is not supported by my observations of the ground, and it seems to have no other support either.

The gravity is reduced to the extent that the inertia is increased.

Meaningless waffle.

The space is fundamentally, generally, and on the whole semi-visible/semi-invisible. The space is equally (and it is both) invisible and visible in conjunction with equivalent/balanced inertia and gravity (both at half strength force/energy), instantaneity, and equivalent/balanced attraction and repulsion. Fundamental instantaneity and gravitational/electromagnetic/inertial equilibrium, balance, and equivalency are present.

I previously asked you to explain these nonsense claims. Now I'm labelling them as what they are: drivel.

Moderator -- your credibility, honesty, and profesionalism are really on the line here.

In case you didn't notice, I'm not the one claiming the earth-shattering new theory of physics. You are. That puts your credibility etc. on the line, not mine. You make the claims - you support them. Get it?

[qutoe]Where is your reply James R Moderator? Checkmate buddy. You cannot refute this. [/quote]

This is my reply. There's nothing to refute. Just miscellaneous words you've put side-by-side and peddled around the internet for years (I assume). There's no substance here.

Author Frank Martin DiMeglio has clearly, generally, and fundamentally unified gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism in conjunction with the fundamental, true, and generalized demonstration/inclusion of both instantaneity and quantum gravity.

Author Frank DiMeglio is a fraud who has nothing to back up any of his grandiose claims. Hell, he is unable to answer the simplest of questions about his own "theory".

Respond to THIS POST James R Moderator -- fully, directly, and specifically. Good luck.

Done.

Physics Today, FQXI.org, and you (James R Moderator) are all evading and lying about this fundamental and general unification of physics that I have definitively, completely, and clearly shown.

I have no idea what FQXI.org is. But I'm happy to side with Physics Today on this one. I assume they have called you out on your bullshit just like I have.

STATE YOUR EXACT AND SPECIFIC REASONS AS TO WHY THIS UNIFICATION IS FUNDAMENTALLY INCORRECT MR. MODERATOR.

What unification? Empty claims that you have unified physics is worth nothing. Can't you see that?

There's nothing to refute. You have no theory. You have nothing but empty words.

Goodbye.

 

[Frank M DiMeglio]

MODERATOR:

Here it all is for you -- completely and clearly.

This is what Einstein's gravity lacks and what dreams FUNDAMENTALLY demonstrate, include, and unify:

1) Instantaneity (and fundamentally).

2) Truly and fundamentally equivalent and balanced inertia and gravity (both at half energy/force strength.) Gravity is reduced to the extent that inertia is increased.

3) Fundamentally balanced and equivalent attraction and repulsion.

4) Gravity and inertia are both FUNDAMENTAL to distance in/of space.

You cannot refute this Moderator. There is nothing that you can do about it. Sorry.

Author Frank Martin DiMeglio has truly, generally, and fundamentally unified physics.

Respond directly and fully to this post Moderator.

 

[AlexG]

James, how much longer will you indulge this insanity?

 

[origin]

Pool it already, man.

 

[AlphaNumeric]

You cannot refute this Moderator. There is nothing that you can do about it. Sorry.

He doesn't need to refute it, you haven't demonstrated it.

It's easy to say things which cannot be refuted because they are gibberish. For example, gravity is the coaxial inertial bifurcation of a semi-stable oscillation in the continuum lattice of the primordial field under which all particles delineate. Go on, prove me wrong.

 

[James R]

Frank:

Obviously, you are only here to advertise your repetitive nonsense claims.

Since you are unable or unwilling to answer questions about your "theory", there is now no place for your theory on sciforums.

You are hereby forbidden from mentioning any of your claims related to your supposed "unification" of physics on sciforums. If you do so, you will be permanently banned.

You may post on other topics.

Have a nice day.

This thread is finished.