How can a rocket land on the moon?

Status
Not open for further replies.
origin said:
People who create sock puppets are the oddest people! They lie and cheat to create a sock puppet, but they couldn't possibly lie about being a sock puppet, so they will never directly deny it. It is just so weird and yet pretty common among the sock puppet crowd.
Click to expand...
I wrote that well !

:(;)

Anyway Elon ,


:O
 
self image
enhanced-8720-1558801818-1.jpg


reality
images
 
Last edited:
RainbowSingularity said:
yes you have

your overt obsession with material anti social fear metaphors clearly shows you have some serious issues.

you seem to covet fear.
though i suspect you do so from a point of being a spoilt child.
Click to expand...
Strange psychology !

Additionally taking the topic off track !

You must like playing psychological games ?
 
Spencer666 said:
Strange psychology !

Additionally taking the topic off track !

You must like playing psychological games ?
Click to expand...

clutching at straws defense by attempting to turn the attention back to me ?

really ?

you posted in the math & physics thread area
where is your maths and physics showing how rockets dont work around the moon ?
 
There is a reflective surface placed on the moon by the visitors proving that man-made objects are on the moon. Haven't you seen the big-bang theory?
 
Moderator note: Spencer666 has been warned for trolling.

For now, I will leave this thread open. I hope that the discussion with Spencer can become more productive.
 
James R said:
Moderator note: Spencer666 has been warned for trolling.

For now, I will leave this thread open. I hope that the discussion with Spencer can become more productive.
Click to expand...
You may as well close the thread because nobody is allowed to disagree with science and the answers you provide are only mainstream propaganda .

You all are just following google information, replying with that information , totally ignoring the physical facts of truths .

Robots all of you !
 
Spencer666 said:
You may as well close the thread because nobody is allowed to disagree with science and the answers you provide are only mainstream propaganda .
Click to expand...
Anyone can disagree with anything here. And if you back it up with science, you'll be listened to. If you back it up with woo, perpetual motion machines and ignorance, you will be laughed at.

Your choice.
You all are just following google information, replying with that information , totally ignoring the physical facts of truths .
Click to expand...
I took my first aero/astro course in 1986 - far before Google existed. Physics worked then, and it works today.
 
billvon said:
Anyone can disagree with anything here. And if you back it up with science, you'll be listened to. If you back it up with woo, perpetual motion machines and ignorance, you will be laughed at.

Your choice.

I took my first aero/astro course in 1986 - far before Google existed. Physics worked then, and it works today.
Click to expand...

deleted
 
Last edited:
Spencer666 said:
deleted
Click to expand...
Ummm deleted

I wonder why

Could it be because it was THIS

Thrust
  1. push suddenly or violently in a specified direction.
A rocket lifts off and pushes

1.Firstly against the launch platform base
2.Secondly the atmosphere
3. Thirdly against its tail section during split
4. Fourthly not applicable

I happen to find in my emails alerting me to new posts?

I note also deleted but not replaced

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
Ummm deleted

I wonder why

Could it be because it was THIS

Thrust
  1. push suddenly or violently in a specified direction.
A rocket lifts off and pushes

1.Firstly against the launch platform base
2.Secondly the atmosphere
3. Thirdly against its tail section during split
4. Fourthly not applicable

I happen to find in my emails alerting me to new posts?

I note also deleted but not replaced

:)
Click to expand...

If I called you Rodney would you know what I meant?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top