They are haters and often hate is driven by jealousy...I really think they are jealous...they clearly don't get out much, don't interact with folk at the shops, probably have never had a night at the pub...I posted a video which says folk like this create a reality that suits their beliefs and clearly, object as he does, James is a perfect fit for the stereotype in the video...look at the lubrication thing...and the definition he finds in some shit dictionary...it tells me every thing about the guy...Anyways it is clear that they have the mob here bullied into submission as no one has come forward to oppose them...they have probably tried in the past and now like me and presumably you say to themselves ...why bother with these folk they have no power to reason...they are brain dead....that is also covered in the video..folk like you and me will only be disappointed because we have a reasonable expectation that arguement will be logical and apparently that is a common feature that you won't get it from them..like don't tell us what you were thinking I know then accuse you of the filth they allow in their minds..look how I set out that I think this and that then you get a reply and it's like fuck don't they read anything?
My latest thing to present is the contribution of the church which given they make up a large part of our culture is worth taking into account....these ding bats won't read the research or admit that perhaps the stand of the church is way more serious than calling someone luv....but James can make stuff up..thats ok..
Bells referring to you as Harvey is just so wrong...you should sue her for defamation.
I am keeping notes don't worry.
Irrational misguided folk ..
Do you know what makes your whole outraged schtick so ridiculous?
The fact that you demand that paddoboy's behaviour of diminishing women is simply the norm and should be excused and just accepted because of his age and because it's just how it is in some parts, while also blaming and accusing the Church for normalising diminishing women and how they should be punished for it..
It becomes even more ridiculous that you are stereotyping others, while faking a moral outrage and as you admitted earlier "playing devil's advocate", about lubrication in the context to which paddoboy has been behaving throughout this thread.. What? Do you think when he tried to claim that the women he sleazed onto are "consenting adults", that he was talking about something else?
You advise him to sue me for defamation?
Let's see how this would go for you and for him..
There is a record dating back years of paddoboy's sexism and self admitting sexual harassment on this website, as well as a record of his sexually harassing members and myself on this website. Not to mention a history of abuse, bullying, stalking and harassment. So, he sues me for defamation because I called him Harvey.. On
your advice.
I pull out this record, because if it pleases the court, Paddoboy has shown a long and detailed history of sexual harassment of women, including probably minors in the places of their employ by his own admittance. I would then also detail how he sexually harassed others on this website. And then, I would explain how he has kept repeating for years that his sexual harassment is simply the norm and common banter... And then I would explain the casting couch analogy and how Harvey's victims were afraid to come forward out of fear of not being able to work - which low and behold, there are countless studies, conducted by the Australian Human Rights Commission, the retail unions, Australia's workers unions, which detail how thousands of young women are sexually harassed in the places of their employ, often by customers and how these young women are afraid to speak out about it because of a well known documented history of the 'customer is always right' attitude and how women are often afraid of being believed and would thus risk their employment and future employment if they complained... Notice the similarities in behaviour and "the norm" there?
And then, because I am a bitch in court, particularly when faced with men who believe sexually harassing women is the norm and should simply be excused based on age, I would detail how paddoboy has a history of demeaning women on this site and attempts to diminish our voices - "girly", "Wegsy", "conniving bitches", "feminazi's" to name a few.
But the pièce de résistance would be how you, a lawyer, could advise someone with such a history to sue for defamation (while forgetting that no one knows who he is on this site) on grounds that you seem to have forgotten to establish.. Not to mention having ignored his many years long history of sexual harassment and self admitted sexual harassment on this site alone..
Then I would turn to you.. I would detail your own history here, your contradictions, your threats of violence towards others, your abusing others, your condoning behaviour that is actually illegal, your attempts to normalise his sexual harassment because of his age while ranting about how the church has normalised sexual harassment and treatment of women, your demands that "old folk" not be criminally accountable and cited laws of diminished capacity that applies to minors - but apparently that diminished capacity goes out the window when he tries to sue for defamation, right?.. to name a few problematic legal issues you would face.
Let me put it to you this way. By the time I would be done, Paddoboy would be publicly known as the Harvey Weinstein of the Woollies circuit and a serial sexual harasser and you would be lucky to still own the caravan you live in while people questioned the morality of your own behaviour in not only condoning the sexual harassment of women, but encouraging it and taking part yourself in sexist behaviour towards women on this site.
How well do you think you are going to go in that endeavour, Alex? Particularly in the dawning age of the #MeToo movement?
I'd suggest you keep taking notes.
That he sexually harasses women?
He's admitted it himself each time he's described his behaviour.
I've provided you with numerous links in regards to the legality of that kind of behaviour.
Sure...I set it out rather well..if you want to be specific go ahead ...what contradicts what?
You have nothing but mud to throw.
Refer to above..
Well you go out to the Lismore shops or any suburb outside of your trendy little suburb and tell each person using the term luv they are wrong...see how you go...the minority is the minority unfortunately for you...now in the suburb that I shop at in Sydney as I have said before...you won't get one person saying love..go somewhere else the opposite can be true.
Now, you go to any of the shops in Lismore and ask those people how they'd feel about an "old man" walking up to their young granddaughter who is working at her first job in the local supermarket and he starts flirting with her and tell her she's pretty.
Having been to Lismore many many times, I'm pretty certain the response would be in the negative.
the same reasons I gave the last time you asked..read them.
Which one?
You've gone from denying doing it to then saying that old people like paddoboy should be deemed to have limited mental capacity like a small child.
Which one would you prefer?
Well thats it then..your job is done...what he does with that information is his business not yours.
Except when he then returns, repeats doing it, demands it's the norm and then treats us that way.
Then it certainly becomes our business.
And yet that's not what I see in the real world. However don't you think actual domestic violence is more worthy of your disgust?
And if this thread was about domestic violence, you might have actually made a point (would have been your first!).
Alas, it is about everyday sexism, in particular paddoboy's sexism.. A sexism that feeds the culture that normalises bad behaviour towards women, including crimes like domestic violence, rape, assaults, etc.
What part of that don't you get yet?
broken shoulder and all.
