Doing the Numbers on No. 1

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by nebel, Apr 30, 2018.

  1. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,578
    Really? Why would that be amazing?
    I have no idea what you are talking about.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. nebel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,455
    why? how?
    I mentioned " ballpark" figures. (not babe ruth roundness)
    Well the correspondents back then, academics all, had never thought of orbit diameters in terms of speed of light, and when ~1000 light seconds popped up out of the long time data., some were surprised, amazed, wrote "clever" about the ramifications. , just a find of one of N N's polished pebbles on the beach.
    Bode has Saturn at 100. or 10 AU. I AU ~ 150 ooo ooo, km or 1000/2 light seconds . Sunlight will reach Saturn in 10x 500 seconds. approx. and then bounce back to you, wherever you are in the orbits. If you know Bode and the 1000/2 you have instant ballpark connection time delay. .
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2018 at 4:48 AM
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,559
    There are facts but your "connection" of the facts is fakery,

    I have two ears and it's two o'clock. Coincidence?

    Yes. Of course it's coincidence.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,743
    And even at that - it's still more accurate than nebel's "ballpark"isms.
     
  8. nebel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,455
    I thought with what you supposed to have between your 2 ears, you would come up with a more striking incident of 2+2 coincidences. like a clock broke and stuck at 2 showing absolute accurate time twice a day , not just standing still, like in
    Dave' s ballpark bewilderment.
    Belittling, bringing bizarre and irrelevant counter - examples is not refuting or erasing the confirmed, not just tentative numbers of 10s for No.1
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2018 at 4:21 AM
  9. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,559
    It's parallel logic, intended to show the bizarre and irrelevant nature of your examples.
     
  10. nebel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,455
    I do not know why you use the word logic in connection with your example.
    2 is too common, most stars are in a binary, 2 , arrangement, most humans come in 2s too, , unless you are Solomon, with his harem of 1000. (10^3)
    so there is another 100 10s for you, you asked for it.
    Bible: 2 are better than 1 , but when it comes to Bode. 10 is better than 2, although
    most orbits are ~ 2 times bigger as you go out.
     
  11. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,559
    To show how silly your "logic" is.
     
  12. nebel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,455
    well, In the OP I did not appeal to a match of logics, simply showed for our home planet a
    10 in the simplest planetary orbit ratios (modified Bode)
    10 ooo light seconds orbit diameter
    1/10 000 speed of light Orbital velocity
    10 meter of water atmospheric pressure
    10 ms^2 surface acceleration
    10 digits.
    It was not planned that way, but that how it turned out. Now what did you plan with your 2 ears at 2 o clock?
    hope it turns our well with what No.10 Downing street is planning.
     
  13. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,559
    I know you didn't. I did.
     

Share This Page