He is learning English phrases and words....he claimed that he meant whatever Rpenner posted....The guy is growing..
When the cranks start lining up to insult me, I can rest easy that I am doing an OK job. And of course the proof is in the thread.
TG , you know that you are not equipped with the science or math to determine the veracity or falsehood of either of these things beyond your gut feel.
Show a bit of humility - acknowledge that, while you have your doubts about these things (which is fair), you don't have enough to form a counter-proposal or defend it - and leave it at that.
What ever humility he ever had, along with his credibility, is long gone. Sad.
Well a critic need not offer the counter proposal......and I am talking about reality, not some gut feeling, because I know that. 2025 is not really that far...
Another cop out? How many is that now?
What is your reality? Some invisible magical Spaghetti monster? A God of the Gaps? Science models according to observational data and experimental data.
That's as close to reality as we get, if not reality.
The reality is that no mass can go inside its event horizon, if at all it happens due to some catastrophic dynamic collapse, it will be transient.. Now its upto others to just prove that....I will not. I am just THE guide.
The reality is that you are totally blinkered....the further reality is that what you say means nothing and in time will die away on a small sliver of cyber space, never to be heard again. That's the reality.
[And well before 2025!
]
Also once again you highlight your ignorance re science in general and the use of the word "proof": You certainly will not invalidate current 21st century cosmology, simply because you cannot: Whether some part of it is invalidated in the future, remains to be seen.
At this stage though, officially as distinct from your fairy tales, BH's stand as near positively confirmed, and GR even more so.
Yes, he knows his maths and physics unlike most of you. But he is trained to speak in favour of that only. Read about political class. He is an insider, revolt and he will be thrown out.
No, wrong again. He is trained in logic and common sense, and collectively the logic and common sense, as dictated by the scientific method, is why the mainstream interpretation is the mainstream and why rpenner adheres to that...You see other than a few cranks that gather like flies around a honey pot on a forum such as this, the majority of scientists and lay people alike are logical and use common sense.
See, a knowledgeable person must be respected despite his compulsions. And he deserves my respect for his knowledge he bias towards me notwithstanding.
Following the scientific methodology and reasoning and refuting your nonsense is not bias: It is what all of us have aduty to do when any ratbag, crank, or religious nut, sets himself up on a soap box, trying to preach that all of 21st century cosmology is wrong.
As I have stated many many times, if that was the case, and you had any evidence, you would not be here. But as in the past, you havn't and you can't.
End of story.
