Hmm the people who are signatories on it, like Israel.
Unless of course, they reject the UN, in which case, the UN resolution giving Israel to them becomes redundant.
But who is the definer of the law? and who interprets it meaning and application, each country has their own definition of law, and what it means,
so the Israelis have their own interpretation of said laws, and who is to say their vision of the Law isn't correct, now how about all of the violations of international law by the Palestinians, I believe that suicide bombing of civilians is against International Law, isn't it? The indiscriminate launching of any rocket is against International Law, isn't it? to attack a Country, Israel 1948, recognized by U.N. Charter, is against International Law, isn't it?
It still comes down to the fact that the Palestinians haven't tried the one thing that would work, Peace, real Peace, no more dead Israeli children, no more Palestinian Children as Suicide Bombers, no more rocket into Israel, walk the path of Gandhi and see were it leads, the reason that Gandhi succeeded was because the British are civilized, the same would work against Israel, the Israelis are civilized and if they didn't let peace be, it would then prove everything you claim, but as of now the Palestinians are the one who always have to have the last blow, and the first blow, and their way, and only their way, and they live a cesspool life for it, they are drowning in their own shit, and they won't try anything different to change the situation.