Thread: Why black men have a bigger penis

  1. #241
    Quote Originally Posted by Dinosaur
    I did not have the patience to read nay of the psots to this thread, but I wonder if anyone really collected evidence to support the claim. If so, why did they take the time and trouble? Is this an important issue?
    Of course not. The first post was a joke. How to use science for a ridiculous personal agenda.

    That makes it all even more hilarious or sad. Depending on how you view human nature.

  2. #242
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    3,501
    Quote Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
    I read somewhere that white dicks are actually a little bigger 6.4 cm average to 6.2 cm but the few other "studies" I've seen show black dicks to be a little bigger. What I also read is that black dicks are longer when not erect but don't expand that much as white dicks when they get hard. That's why guys think every black has a 14 inch dick when they see them in the change room.
    Thanks for the first empirical data posted but this can't be right. I agree that black's look longer - and fatter - when not erect, but mine is about 9 or 10 cm not erect and almost 15 erect. When I showered in high school with dozens of other classmates I noticed no extraordinary difference - although I really never took note. Where's the data and the "few other studies"? This whole thread is rubbish.

  3. #243
    Quote Originally Posted by valich
    Thanks for the first empirical data posted but this can't be right. I agree that black's look longer - and fatter - when not erect, but mine is about 9 or 10 cm not erect and almost 15 erect. When I showered in high school with dozens of other classmates I noticed no extraordinary difference - although I really never took note. Where's the data and the "few other studies"? This whole thread is rubbish.
    Fuck, I made a typo, not 6.4 cm but 6.4 inches.

  4. #244
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    292
    I appreciate what you are saying.

    No puny human can hope to reproduce the entire model of evolution in their patheitc brains. You cannot simply say something like African women like big penises so they propogated more. There are potentially infinitely more factors.

  5. #245
    Registered Senior Member Kumar's Avatar
    Posts
    1,872
    Quote Originally Posted by spuriousmonkey
    Yes. when blood keeps flowing into the penis and is not let out for a very long time the tissue will start dying. This will result in a blackened penis after a certain period of time.
    As such, more blood flow due to prolonged vasidilation will kill the tissues or will icrease the cellular growth?

    Many medications are aimed at vasodilation. Mostly, insulin can also relax arterial muscles tone. Parasympathetic stimulation can also cause some vasodilation whereas sympathetic vasoconstriction.

    Flaccid length
    Length of the unencumbered flaccid penis is not necessarily proportional to size of the erect penis. Blood flow from arousal, and its relationship to the subsequent length measurement of the now erect penis varies widely among men. Hence a smaller than average flaccid penis might grow to five times its flaccid length and twice its girth, or conversely a flaccid penis on the larger side might only grow to 1.5 times the length when filled with blood. The transition to erection and its relationship to measurements is by no means a one size fits all equation.

    A study published in the September 1996 Journal of Urology concluded that mean flaccid length was 8.8 cm (3.5 in). (Measured by staff)[3]
    Low temperatures affect the size of the flaccid penis. One general physiological response to cold is decreased circulation of blood to the extremities, which includes the external genitals. The penis will often shrink further as a result
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penis_size
    Last edited by Kumar; 09-22-06 at 01:26 PM.

  6. #246
    Quote Originally Posted by Kumar
    As such, more blood flow due to prolonged vasidilation will kill the tissues or will icrease the cellular growth?
    If we speculate then we must consider one physiological aspect of the penis. Bloodflow out of the penis is constricted in case of an erection. There is not just a case of extra blood flowing in. Blood can't flow out.

    This is also known as priapism.

    In serious cases the condition may result in gangrene, which may necessitate penis removal, and in the worst cases, castration. (wiki)

  7. #247
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    5,285
    Quote Originally Posted by John99
    Well i have seen hundreds of penis'\Peni, years or so ago i was employed in a position i would rather not discuss....anyway, we took showers together almost daily and from new guys comin in and location changes and the fact it was very intigrated i am able to levy an informal assessment throughout the 6 years or so i looked...so what i admit it....who wouldnt and whats the big deal anyway?

    The point is there was not real distinction, there were big ones and little ones,the funny thing is the the two smallest ones were on one black and one white, to give an idea think of a mushroom cap with no stalk. I felt so bad i gave one my old car instead of selling it.

    But the most startling sight and tbh quite shocking was the biggest one was on this short Italian dude, when he stood there it was like everyone just went whoa.

    Well i'm no longer employed in that position because i chose to spend one long weekend with two women (not hookers) in a hotel and well lets just say i came up dirty and i said "see you" ...true story.

    also, one of the women claimed to be a witch and told me there was a curse on me, i think she was too.
    Oh John! I'm tingling now!

  8. #248
    Registered Senior Member
    Posts
    5,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
    90% of university professors are flaming liberals. To expect unbiased information is the height of naivety. I said average brain size is an objective measurable fact. Did you find any evidence that brain sizes are the same? No.

    Who said I was a high school grad? My level of education is graduate but quite frankly it isn't a real measure of intelligence and to assume that anyone with a graduate level degree is smarter than anyone who doesn't is a sign of ignorance.

    As for http://www.castefootball.us/ I posted the link to demonstrate that the media suppresses the accomplishments of White athletes just like they overplay the abililites of Blacks and underplay the abilities of Whites in general. Castefootball doesn't discuss intelligence per se, it does however cover the criminal and buffoon behaviour of Black athletes who no doubt suffer from poverty and oppression.

    I don't believe that the IQ testers test mixed raced people, or more specifically, when they do, they put them in the mixed race category. What is no surprise is that the IQ of mixed race children tend to be higher than Black average IQ and lower than White average IQ but of course according to you we can't read anything into that. Actually, the typical American Black is approximately 18% White which partially accounts for their higher IQs than pure Black Africans.

    I didn't read the "narrowing" gap you mentioned, in every study I've read, the gap was narrow (a few points) why don't you point out something that says differently.

    I said IQ tests measure abstract thinking and that higher levels of educaiton (and age related IQ tests) require more abstract thinking to master. When doing simple addition, one can count there fingers or concrete materials to solve problems. When doing calculus, counting your fingers isn't going to help much.

    As for your "poor schools" and "50 kids to a classroom", A liberal judge in Missouri was granted his wet dream and allowed to spend as much money as he wanted to create the ideal schools for Black kids. His efforts of course were a total disaster...

    http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives...atest_colo.php

    Catastrophe in Kansas City

    The effort to integrate the Kansas City public schools is one of the most costly, misguided, and ineffectual programs ever undertaken in America in the name of racial equality. This billion-dollar effort has been so utterly a failure that only good can come of it. Catastrophe as complete as this may shake even a liberal’s confidence. This may well be the high-water mark of the astonishing efforts whites have made to build a society in the name of an illusory equality.

    Kansas City came to national attention ten years ago, when federal District Judge Russell Clark ordered the school district to build and staff the best, most expensive public schools in the country—perhaps in the world. They were to be so dazzlingly good that they would both lure white students out of their safe suburbs and raise black student achievement to the white level. Judge Clark was even willing to wield dictatorial power to get what he wanted, looting both the city and the state to fund the gold-plated schools that desegregation was thought to require.

    Of course, the grand experiment failed. The wondrous schools were duly built but blacks learned no more in them than before. Whites stayed in the suburbs. And now a recent Supreme Court decision will probably cut off massive subsidies from the state, leaving the city with a hugely expensive system to run and no money. If Kansas City cannot dream up new ways to make whites pay for them, the dream schools will slide back into the ramshackled mediocrity from which Judge Clark thought he had lifted them.

    Separate and Equal

    The Kansas City, Missouri school district first opened in September 1867, with four schools for whites and one for blacks. The state constitution, like that of sixteen other states at the time, required segregation. A law passed the following year reaffirmed segregation, but required that black schools be equal to white.

    Eventually the city was operating one high school and 14 elementary schools for blacks. Almost all of these schools were north of 27th Street, which was the traditional boundary of the Negro quarter. The city also made a serious effort to make the schools equal. Black teachers were paid the same salaries as white, and in most years the city spent approximately as much on black students as it did on whites. During the 1936-37 school year, for example, it cost $79.31 to educate each white elementary school pupil (about $825 in today’s money) and $69.10 to educate a black pupil. In 1940-41, however, the district spent $118.61 on each black high school student but somewhat less—$110.43—on whites.

    Even if there was rough equality in the operating budget, blacks were sometimes slighted in the capital budget. Their schools were often old and overcrowded. In 1949, parents of students at the all-black Bruce elementary school sued the city to replace rickety buildings. The Missouri Supreme Court upheld a lower-court denial of relief, arguing that although the Bruce school had no auditorium, gymnasium, or cafeteria, there were white schools in the state that were no better off. Moreover, since the curriculum at the Bruce school was equivalent to that of white schools, the black parents had no grounds for complaint.

    The 1950s are now acknowledged to have been the salad days for Kansas City public schools. Sixty-nine thousand students (77 percent of them white) got what was, by today’s standards, a superb education in their segregated schools. The beginning of the end was, of course, 1954.

    That year, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated schools were unconstitutional. Kansas City obediently prepared to desegregate. A color-blind plan was drawn up whereby students would simply attend the schools nearest them, whether they had been all-black or all-white.

    Desegregation proceeded so smoothly in 1955 that the Kansas City Star did not even write a story about it. There were no disturbances because housing in the city was so segregated that only a handful of students were affected by integration. Moreover, almost 90 percent of the 921 white children who were to have attended formerly-black schools quietly moved out of their neighborhoods over the summer. When the school year began, only 117 of them were left to integrate the black schools. Their numbers dropped very quickly, and soon voluntary desegregation in Kansas City fit the pattern found all over the country: Almost the only people who crossed the color line were the children of ambitious black parents who wanted their children to attend white schools.

    Whites began to drift towards the suburbs, and in 1970 the school district lost its white majority for the first time. Most schools, however, were still either overwhelmingly white or overwhelmingly black. By the mid-1970s, two-thirds of the students were black, and the district was showing all the stigmata of a black institution: crumbling buildings, poor discipline, declining test scores.

    With so few white students to go around, meaningful integration was no longer possible, and by 1977, the school board was desperate. That year, it sued everyone in sight, in the hope of dragging 18 white, suburban school districts into a single, huge district. Forced busing would then flush precious white children out of the suburbs to rejuvenate Kansas City; and the suburbs would be taxed to pay for it.

    Judge Russell Clark got the case but did not make important decisions until six years later. In 1984, he let the terrified suburbs off the hook. Following a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision, he argued that since the suburban districts were not responsible for residential segregation they could not be forced into a shotgun marriage with Kansas City.

    It was the next year, 1985, that he hit upon the final solution to the segregation problem: urban schools so extraordinary that bigoted whites would voluntarily abandon their suburbs and private schools to flock to the city and sit next to blacks.

    Judge Clark was realistic enough to realize that these schools would have to be spectacular, and spectacular they are. Of the more than $1.4 billion that has been spent in ten years on this “desegregation” plan, $418 million has gone for renovation and new construction, though not always wisely. After a $1 million patch-up of Central High School did not raise it to Judge Clark’s standards, the old school was torn down and the district sank $32 million into a gleaming new one.

    Paseo High was another school that Judge Clark pronounced unsalvageable. Built from a type of limestone found nowhere else in the country, it was a cherished architectural landmark. The judge didn’t care. Protesters watched in tears as the school was dynamited on his orders.

    The district now has 12 brand new schools—scores of houses had to be bulldozed to make way for some of them—with equipment to make a teacher’s head swim: planetariums, olympic-size swimming pools with underwater observation windows, dust-free diesel mechanics rooms, at least one mock-United Nations wired for simultaneous interpretation, radio and television studios capable of real broadcasting, video editing and animation labs, a moot court complete with jury room and judges chambers, a model Greek village to teach participatory democracy, elementary schools with one personal computer for every two children, etc. etc. These are the famed “magnet schools” that were supposed to attract white children like so many iron filings.

    Another $900 million has gone for special staff to operate these wonders, and across-the-board raises for teachers and administrators. There are German- and French-language elementary schools which, of course, must be staffed with native speakers. The former coach of the Soviet Olympic fencing team has been hired—along with an interpreter—to teach Missouri rubes the finer points of sword play. It has been, in short, an unprecedented orgy of spending, overseen by school superintendent, Walter Marks, who has been pleased to see the salary for his position leap from $75,000 to $140,000.

    Where did the $1.4 billion come from? Judge Clark raised it through two astonishing acts of judicial dictatorship. In 1987, he unilaterally raised Kansas City property taxes, first from 2.05 percent to four percent and eventually 4.96 percent—the first time in American history that a federal judge has levied taxes. This breath-taking usurpation of power simply ignored an amendment to the Missouri constitution that requires a two-thirds supermajority vote to raise property taxes past 3.25 percent. Judge Clark even tried to impose a surcharge on income taxes, but an appeals court struck this down as an invasion of the province of the state legislature.

    When it became clear that Kansas City could be bled no further, Judge Clark decided to pillage the state—but on what grounds? In a flourish of legal non-reasoning, he decided that the state had contributed to segregation in Kansas City by permitting such things as restrictive covenants in deeds and by doing nothing to mix up the races. In penance for these past crimes, the state has been forced to pay more than $800 million to make the city’s schools fit for suburban white people. Needless to say, the state attorney general has repeatedly contested this exaction, but until June (see below) had lost every court battle.

    The astonishing thing is that ever since 1955 there has been no school segregation in Kansas City. By the time of Judge Clark’s decisions, no one was even pretending that the city or the state or the school district was discriminating. By no sane reading of civil rights laws can Kansas City be found guilty. It had bad public schools and two-thirds of the students were black. In the never-never land of Judge Clark’s mind, this was unacceptable. It could only be the result of racism, and not just any old racism; this was Government-perpetrated racism in violation of the United States Constitution.

    Because he was springing to the defense of that holy document, he appointed himself school district dictator, with the power to eliminate everything he considered a “vestige” of discrimination. In a crowning act of folly, he decreed that he would continue to run the schools until the test scores of black children were appreciably the same as those of whites. So long as blacks did not do as well as whites, the segregation of ages past was still doing its evil work.

    Complete Failure

    What have been the results of this grand experiment? Instructional costs, not including costs of the building program, have more than doubled from $3,094 per pupil per year to $8,000 (during the same period, the state average rose from $2,470 to $3,760). Average classroom size has decreased from 38-47 to 22-27, and the number of school librarians has shot up from 13 to 56. Ten years ago the district had no “counselors” for elementary school students. Now it has 53 of them. All this luxury is lavished on only 36,350 students as opposed to a high of 69,000 in the 1950s. The overall operating budget has leapt in seven years from $142 million to $500 million while the number of students has stayed the same.

    Whites have not behaved like iron filings. A comparison of the 1985-1986 school year—the first year of the “magnet” program—with that of 1992-93 shows that white attendance has continued to drop slightly, from 26.4 percent to 25.2 percent. Every year some 1,400 suburban students take the bus into town, but the white turnover rate is very high; most whites go back to suburbia after one or two years. The district has an annual “marketing and recruitment” budget of $1.8 million to lure other whites into town to take their places. Martin Luther King Middle School, which requires uniforms for all students and emphasizes the study of Latin grammar (!), has the best reputation among whites—and manages to attract only 55 students from the suburbs.

    The small number of Kansas City whites who send their children to public schools have developed a recognizable pattern of patronizing only the lower grades. The racial performance gap is narrower at these ages and adolescence has not yet turned many blacks into predators and trouble-makers. When it is time to enter four or fifth grade, most white children go to the suburbs or to private school.

    What effect has more than a billion dollars had on school performance? During the seven years of Judge Clark’s dictatorship, the dropout rate has climbed from 6.5 percent to 11.4 percent and the average daily senior high school attendance rate has dropped from 81.5 percent to 76.2 percent. The racial gap in achievement levels has remained unchanged, starting with a gap of several months in first grade and growing to two or three years by graduation. Test scores on standardized tests—essentially unchanged—are highest in the elementary grades, which have the most whites.

    In short, nothing has turned out as Judge Clark hoped. It is probably true, as the district lamely argues, that even more whites would have fled the district were it not for fencing coaches and planetariums. The district is nevertheless more nonwhite than ever and the racial performance gap continues to yawn, just as it does in every school in every district in every city in every state.

    In the white suburbs, in places like Raytown and Lee’s Summit, schools spend less than half the money Kansas City does on each student and get much better results. The Blue Springs district, for example, spends $3,403 per pupil compared to $8,000 per pupil in Kansas city. By the third grade, its students are already 70 to 80 points ahead of Kansas City on the Missouri standardized test (graded from 200 points to 595).

    If anything, the school district faces its worst crisis ever. Superintendent Walter Marks, who happily spent hundreds of millions during his three years on the job, was fired in February. In 1994 he managed to find 14 reasons to leave town on school business. Worse still, during a paid leave of absence for back problems, he was filmed by a hidden Kansas City television crew carrying lumber into his new home in Florida. The crew also caught him bounding onto the airplane to come home, but by the time it got to Missouri he had to hobble off with a cane.

    The search for a replacement has been hampered by a June decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that finally reins in Judge Clark, and may end the annual tribute from the state. In a 5-4 decision, in which the Clinton administration entered a motion in support of the status quo, the court invalidated most of Judge Clark’s efforts to fight “segregation.” Since the suburban school districts were not drawn along racial lines and cannot be blamed for “segregation” in Kansas City, Judge Clark did not have the authority to consider them as part of his solution. The actions he took to make the city schools more attractive to suburban students were therefore improper.

    No one is going to make him tear down the luxury schools. However, he bypassed the collective bargaining procedure to grant raises to school employees in the hope of making the schools more attractive to suburban whites. The raises may be rolled back.

    In a remarkable fit of common sense, the Supreme Court ruled that scores on standardized tests are a ridiculous measure of integration, and that the state of Missouri cannot be held financial hostage to poor black performance. After pouring over $800 million into this colossal blunder, the state may finally be off the hook.

    Of course, Kansas City has become addicted to the $100 million or so every year that Judge Clark made the state hand over in operating expenses. The city is in a panic at the prospect of running the schools without state money. Once that money is gone, who is going to fix the video editing machine when it breaks down? Who is going to pay the security guards who keep the personal computers and machine shop tools from walking out the door? Who is even going to do simple maintenance on the huge, new, fancy school buildings?

    To hazard a prediction, unless Kansas City can find fresh whites to bleed (see sidebar), in 10 years its public schools will be worse than ever. About the time the fencing coaches are laid off, the few remaining whites will lose their taste for the exotic and will clear out. The schools will become grimmer and more savage. As they do in Chicago, Newark, and the Bronx, exhausted teachers will maintain the barest facade of scholarship in what will come to resemble holding pens for young blacks and Hispanics. The only difference will be that in Kansas City, this familiar chaos will reign in what was once the most costly and ambitious school district in the country.

    Of course, the Kansas City debacle has been a valuable experiment that has yielded fine data. Anyone but a dreamer could have predicted the results perfectly, but now they are clear enough to startle a liberal: (1) Not even the most opulent schools will tempt more than a handful of whites voluntarily to attend classes that are majority black, and (2) no amount of money can bridge the racial gap in academic performance.


    If your IQ is really 150, I'll eat a cheesecake. Your reasoning and logic abilities are so shitty I'd be surprised if it was 115.
    As a KC resident I recall all the news about this. It never ends. The District is still in chaos, there is regular violence in the schools, scores are rock bottom and everyone that can makes damn sure their kids don't go to KCMO schools. KC is huge, city limits wise, and extends north of the Missouri river for 30 miles. Residents there (overwhelmingly white suburbs) were incensed that moves were being made to bus KCMO kids to their all white districts. The plan failed and resegregation is back on track. The fancy, state of the art schools built with the billions paid by taxpayers are routinely vandalized, some even burned. The only patrons of KCMO schools are those that can't get out.

  9. #249
    Registered Senior Member Kumar's Avatar
    Posts
    1,872
    Quote Originally Posted by spuriousmonkey
    If we speculate then we must consider one physiological aspect of the penis. Bloodflow out of the penis is constricted in case of an erection. There is not just a case of extra blood flowing in. Blood can't flow out.

    This is also known as priapism.

    In serious cases the condition may result in gangrene, which may necessitate penis removal, and in the worst cases, castration. (wiki)
    There can be evolved, adapted or aquired increase in capacity to get more blood flow, effect thereof and hold more blood. Whether black skin tells us previous exposure to vasodilators and imbalanced hammering on ANS-natural or manmade?

  10. #250
    Without having done the proper research I can only speculate but my guess is that there is not so much a difference in bloodflow regulation but a difference in the amount of tissue that can hold the excess blood resulting in a larger erection.

    There have been remarks in this thread regarding the notion that the penis of some groups within the human population are larger when non-erect but this effect is largely disappearing during an erection. This would suggest that the ratio of erectile tissue and other penile tissue in the penis can be changed resulting in a penis model where the penis is large when not erect, and a penis that is small when not erect but equally large when erect.

    Needless to say we will either have to disect some of these penises in a quantity of statistical significance or use a non-invasive technique to support this theory.

  11. #251
    Mourning in America madanthonywayne's Avatar
    Posts
    12,404
    It amazes me that this thread is still going strong. I've not read every post, so perhaps my theory has already been advanced. But in my opinion, it's simply a matter of races other than black being subject to greater selective pressure since they were colonizing new areas while the blacks were staying home.

    The black race, under less selective pressure, may have evolved larger penises for the same reason peacocks have giant tails. An extravagent mating display.

    While other races in new territories were struggling just to survive. So penis size was not a priority. Plus, since these new territories were cold, men could rarely make a display of them.

  12. #252
    Quote Originally Posted by madanthonywayne
    It amazes me that this thread is still going strong. I've not read every post, so perhaps my theory has already been advanced. But in my opinion, it's simply a matter of races other than black being subject to greater selective pressure since they were colonizing new areas while the blacks were staying home.

    The black race, under less selective pressure, may have evolved larger penises for the same reason peacocks have giant tails. An extravagent mating display.

    While other races in new territories were struggling just to survive. So penis size was not a priority. Plus, since these new territories were cold, men could rarely make a display of them.
    That's just a silly theory. Most african people do not walk around naked. Nor do the women normally choose the man.

  13. #253
    Registered Senior Member Kumar's Avatar
    Posts
    1,872
    Quote Originally Posted by spuriousmonkey
    Without having done the proper research I can only speculate but my guess is that there is not so much a difference in bloodflow regulation but a difference in the amount of tissue that can hold the excess blood resulting in a larger erection.
    What can make difference in the amount of tissue that can hold the excess blood?

    Heat exposure is related to excessive blood flow to skin to enhance perspiration for getting cooling effect.

    In general, people with ancestors from sunny regions have darker skin than people with ancestors from regions with less sunlight...
    While dark skin protects vitamin B, it can lead to a vitamin D deficiency. The advantage of light skin is that it does not block sunlight as effectively, leading to increased production of vitamin D3, necessary for calcium absorption and bone growth.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color
    There is a relation of above with type of blood flow.
    Last edited by Kumar; 09-23-06 at 10:25 AM.

  14. #254
    Quote Originally Posted by spuriousmonkey
    That's just a silly theory. Most african people do not walk around naked. Nor do the women normally choose the man.
    How did they walk around before Whitey showed up?

  15. #255
    Quote Originally Posted by Genji
    As a KC resident I recall all the news about this. It never ends. The District is still in chaos, there is regular violence in the schools, scores are rock bottom and everyone that can makes damn sure their kids don't go to KCMO schools. KC is huge, city limits wise, and extends north of the Missouri river for 30 miles. Residents there (overwhelmingly white suburbs) were incensed that moves were being made to bus KCMO kids to their all white districts. The plan failed and resegregation is back on track. The fancy, state of the art schools built with the billions paid by taxpayers are routinely vandalized, some even burned. The only patrons of KCMO schools are those that can't get out.
    Now don't you go verifying some article I posted here, don't you know that everything I post is a fairytale made up by some pointy headed racist?

    When you hear about "bad schools" it's usually not about the "schools", it's who are the students in them.

  16. #256
    Quote Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
    Cole Grey, I've posted most or all of the points I have wanted to make on this subject for now so I will stop knocking heads with you, it is getting tiring and boring. Blacks have lower IQ and intelligence and you can believe that being poor causes low IQ while I will believe that having low IQ makes you poor. Low income Whites have higher IQ than higher income Blacks, and Blacks raised by rich Whites still have low IQs which match up with their biological parents. I just wanted to do my part in countering the liberal propaganda that saturates the media and education system (see above post for more info).
    Let me just make an addition here, everyone started out poor in the beginning, in fact, Whites and Asians started out even poorer than Africans because living in northern climates where you can freeze to death and food is harder to find is a lot harder than living in the tropics where you won't freeze to death and food is way easier to find. So if Whites started out poorer, how was it they and not Blacks came to civilization first?

  17. #257
    Quote Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
    How did they walk around before Whitey showed up?
    http://www.popmatters.com/tv/reviews...s/survivor.jpg
    How does whitey walk around on tv?

    P.S. Not all of your INFORMATION is from fairytales, your INTERPRETATIONS are.
    Please don't be ignorant enough to think that, because someone agrees that the program didn't work, they add one iota of evidence to your reasons why.

    P.P.S. You can't even get a valid meaning out of current data, so I am most certainly not going to waste any time arguing about the background of race, based on your uninformed idedas of the beginnings of divisions, and going back into pre-history with your biases as a reasearch companion.

  18. #258
    It's kind of interesting how you work, cole.
    If you find a reason to doubt an idea you don't like, no matter how small it is, it's big enough to completely discount the idea.

    Now we've been presenting before you a lot of data that convincingly support our point. In each case, you manage to convince yourself that there is a tiny reason to doubt it, and so the whole conclusion must be wrong.

    You do it every time and none of the information gets through to you at all. Did you learn anything? What my question is, do you read our data and scientific articles that support our arguments and then promptly forget it?

    I know if I were in your position, after time when the evidence piles on itself, it would begin to have an effect on me. Is your opinion the exact same now as it was before you began posting in this thread?

  19. #259
    Quote Originally Posted by cole grey
    http://www.popmatters.com/tv/reviews...s/survivor.jpg
    How does whitey walk around on tv?

    P.S. Not all of your INFORMATION is from fairytales, your INTERPRETATIONS are.
    Please don't be ignorant enough to think that, because someone agrees that the program didn't work, they add one iota of evidence to your reasons why.

    P.P.S. You can't even get a valid meaning out of current data, so I am most certainly not going to waste any time arguing about the background of race, based on your uninformed idedas of the beginnings of divisions, and going back into pre-history with your biases as a reasearch companion.
    My job is not to convince you I'm right, my job is to do my part to counter the liberal propaganda the media and education system spews and forces others to spew via threat of imprisonment or loss of employment. You are too brainwashed/braindead to be reached but hopefully some of the lurkers on this site will have their eyes opened enough to investigate further of their own. Some of the people who agree with me were flaming liberals that thought exactly as you do until realilty shattered their fairytale world. If it was up to me, I'd force you to work at one of those KC school hellholes. After a week, I'd ask for your opinions again.

  20. #260
    Mourning in America madanthonywayne's Avatar
    Posts
    12,404
    Quote Originally Posted by Count Sudoku
    Let me just make an addition here, everyone started out poor in the beginning, in fact, Whites and Asians started out even poorer than Africans because living in northern climates where you can freeze to death and food is harder to find is a lot harder than living in the tropics where you won't freeze to death and food is way easier to find. So if Whites started out poorer, how was it they and not Blacks came to civilization first?
    Because whites and Asians had to develop a higher level of technology just to survive. Then one thing led to another....

    Meanwhile Africans just kept on keepin' on. Doing things the way they always had. Until the whites finally returned and rounded them up as slaves.

    It's pretty much the same pattern responsible for empires rising and falling throughout human history. A large relatively successful group soon becomes fat and happy. They stop progressing. Meanwhile the barbarians must accept change just to survive. Ultimately they return and use the skills they've developed to destroy those who once oppressed them and a new empire is born. Then repeat, ad infinitum.

Similar Threads

  1. By Matthew Brady in forum Human Science
    Last Post: 07-27-10, 08:01 AM
    Replies: 98
  2. By 85681356 in forum Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology
    Last Post: 04-30-09, 06:53 AM
    Replies: 6
  3. By Fraggle Rocker in forum Human Science
    Last Post: 06-26-07, 02:47 PM
    Replies: 178
  4. By genep in forum Linguistics
    Last Post: 06-20-07, 06:35 PM
    Replies: 1
  5. By 1100f in forum Physics & Math
    Last Post: 05-15-06, 05:54 PM
    Replies: 54

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •