The creation of their white ethnostate, free of Jews, blacks and cultural Marxism, yes.
While ignoring
the adoption of traditional gender roles..?
Or their hatred of women they deem to be "feminists" or women who work outside of what they deem to be the norm? There is a reason why the 'gamergate' fiasco was so well supported by the far right in targeting female gamers.
See that your problem, you believe they are all the same and all irremediable, that attitude will assure a second term for trump. we NEED to pull of just a small percentage of them, and we can't do that with you and your ilk dividing and ostracizing even more people.
You won't "pull" them, because they literally voted against their own interests, EF. Your views that you can sell them a better economy, healthcare, education.. These are people who actively voted against all of that and have done repeatedly. Unless you wish the Democratic platform would embrace a pro-life stance, for example, you won't "pull" those voters. These are 'values' voters, who view guns, god and pro-life over healthcare, education and the economy.
The guy who espouses your ideology.
I argue it is because people like you have cut out all counter thought demonize anyone that does not agree with your clique fully. Your interpretation of his memo is precisely the problem, he suggest an alternate theory on why their is a non-50/50 gender ratio and the need to be able to at least discuss and review alternate theories, and was fired for it. You see it as "right wing propaganda" and refuse to actually review his arguments from there on. People like you cut out everyone else, and now we have trump for it. All those people that voted against their own interests, some of them did it not because of religion, or guns or abortion, but just because they had been banished by people like you, told they were "right wing" enough times that they came to believe.
His right wing beliefs demands a protection for white males and he is against any policy that would encourage women and minorities from studying and gaining employment in these fields because he views that as sexist and racist against white males.
No that your mis-charaterization, projection and red herring. He is saying the the #metoo hysteria will results in businesses questions why to hire women, a unwanted consequence that will harm women. Speaking out about harassment on social media will have very harmful consequences to women, because the properway would be to have all those women go to the police.
He also cited his friends who are considering removing all women as their employees and basically not hiring women in the future and he fully agrees with their practices.. After citing why women are bad for employers.
It is astonishing that this is the response to women daring to speak out against sexual harassment and sexual assault and shows just how entrenched rape culture is. To wit, he is throwing down for hiring less qualified people, based solely on their sex, because women may prove to be too costly to hire.
If going to the police is "second rape" then what is your solution? Dumping it on social media? I'm telling you all the harmful consequences of that, that it will cost liberals and women more then it may gain, and what does it gain, that several harassers are defamed? That is worth it all?
I have linked you what my suggestion to fix the problem how many times now? The demand that I keep reposting the same thing while ignoring what has been posted already is literally trolling. Please stop doing that.
Threatened about what? How do I feel threatened?
You keep whining about it. Practice what you preach. If women posting about men in regards to sexual harassment and sexual assault offends you, stop reading it. If you present it like a threat, then go to the police. Isn't that what you keep demanding women do when they feel threatened or harassed?
How? How is saying "don't do that" make me come across as a misogynistic creep? You are being absurd: your refusing to acknowledge how impossible it is to not make anyone uncomfortable. Others have made me uncomfortable, women have made me uncomfortable, yet I did not think of them as misandristic creeps, you on the other hand are insane if you think you need a key jammed between you fingers to defend your self against me, but I'm not threaten by that either, I would gladly take your keys to my face, ever scar added to the price of the law suit against you for assault.
I have explained why. Misogynists like you, who directly demand that women harm themselves to fit your ideals of how women should behave, are a threat to women. Put simply, you have so little disregard for the safety and wellbeing of women that as far as I am concerned, you would be deemed a threat to my safety and wellbeing. You would be the guy I'd be warning other women about and advising to avoid you like the plague because of your deeply held misogynistic ideology. And I have fought off men like you when they believed their rights trumped my rights over my own body with my keys. You would hardly be any different. You see, men like you, with the beliefs that you have, are a threat to women and victims of sexual violence. You're like a walking advertisement for rape culture. How can any woman or sexual violence victim not see you as a threat or someone to avoid after what you have said about women and sexual violence on this site? You come across like a misogynistic creep.
Well then we have very different general gist of it. [snip for word count].
Because he was spouting rubbish. He fails to factor in actual science and is instead adopting a stance of traditional gender roles while failing to factor in that women have traditionally not applied for these positions or even studied it, because up until not that long ago, women were basically blacklisted from applying.
The bias against girls starts in 'elementary' school, when it comes to subjects like maths. It has nothing to do with biology, but how girls are treated from a young age, particularly by their teachers who have pushed 'maths and science' is for boys and marking tests and papers accordingly, girls unfortunately believe they are worse and are pushed into more social courses, while boys are pushed towards STEM subjects. It's not because of biology,
but because of bias that rates the abilities of girls much lower.
Damore objects to removing the bias that exists, that would result in encouraging women to enter the STEM field (as well as minorities, whom he tried to argue the biological IQ crap for in his memo as well). That is the gist of his memo.
He is claiming it is biology. Science, actual science, shows that it is culture. Put simply, his memo was an unscientific load of crap.
Why do you keep bring up this red herring? How about this, you tell me why you think i'm "spreading right wing propaganda" I can take a guess at what the answer already is. You have a preset belief about me and see only what you want to see to fulfill that belief, now if you believe that a winning plurality of the electorate are misogynistic creeps, well you sort of made that a self fulfilling prophesy.
Because you are posting like a right wing misogynist.
Now since you keep asking this question of me, yet have not answer my questions of you I don't see a reason to answer. Perhaps we can agree on an exchange of questions and answer, answer me my question first: Would you vote for Bob Dole or Bill Clinton?
I have already answered this question.
The answer is 'neither'.
The reason should be fairly obvious.
Sexual assault has not been acceptable for some time now, decades now. The surveyed rates of it have been going down... what more do you want?
Oh? So why do you demand that women and sexual assault victims subject themselves to 'second rape' that literally seeks to protect the accused?
